Dynamical Analysis of Bayesian Inference Models for the Eriksen Task

The Eriksen task is a classical paradigm that explores the effects of competing sensory inputs on response tendencies and the nature of selective attention in controlling these processes. In this task, conflicting flanker stimuli interfere with the processing of a central target, especially on short reaction time trials. This task has been modeled by neural networks and more recently by a normative Bayesian account. Here, we analyze the dynamics of the Bayesian models, which are nonlinear, coupled discrete time dynamical systems, by considering simplified, approximate systems that are linear and decoupled. Analytical solutions of these allow us to describe how posterior probabilities and psychometric functions depend on model parameters. We compare our results with numerical simulations of the original models and derive fits to experimental data, showing that agreements are rather good. We also investigate continuum limits of these simplified dynamical systems and demonstrate that Bayesian updating is closely related to a drift-diffusion process, whose implementation in neural network models has been extensively studied. This provides insight into how neural substrates can implement Bayesian computations.

[1]  Philip Holmes,et al.  A Neural Network Model of the Eriksen Task: Reduction, Analysis, and Data Fitting , 2008, Neural Computation.

[2]  Joshua W. Brown,et al.  Monitoring and Control of Action by the Frontal Lobes , 2002, Neuron.

[3]  Steven D. Blostein,et al.  Optimality of the sequential probability ratio test for nonstationary observations , 1992, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[4]  C. Gardiner Handbook of Stochastic Methods , 1983 .

[5]  J. Gold,et al.  Banburismus and the Brain Decoding the Relationship between Sensory Stimuli, Decisions, and Reward , 2002, Neuron.

[6]  P. Holmes,et al.  The dynamics of choice among multiple alternatives , 2006 .

[7]  S. Shreve,et al.  Stochastic differential equations , 1955, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[8]  Michael L. Platt,et al.  Neural correlates of decision variables in parietal cortex , 1999, Nature.

[9]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Pre- and poststimulus activation of response channels: a psychophysiological analysis. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The time course of perceptual choice: the leaky, competing accumulator model. , 2001, Psychological review.

[11]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .

[12]  Peter Dayan,et al.  Inference, Attention, and Decision in a Bayesian Neural Architecture , 2004, NIPS.

[13]  J. Wolfowitz,et al.  Optimum Character of the Sequential Probability Ratio Test , 1948 .

[14]  Xiao-Jing Wang,et al.  A Recurrent Network Mechanism of Time Integration in Perceptual Decisions , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  E. Donchin,et al.  Optimizing the use of information: strategic control of activation of responses. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[16]  Angela J. Yu,et al.  Dynamics of attentional selection under conflict: toward a rational Bayesian account. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Connectionist and diffusion models of reaction time. , 1999, Psychological review.

[18]  Norbert Schmitz,et al.  Comment on 'Optimality of the sequential probability ratio test for nonstationary observations' by Y. Liu and S.D. Blostein , 1995, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[19]  Philip L. Smith,et al.  A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time. , 2004, Psychological review.

[20]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  The physics of optimal decision making: a formal analysis of models of performance in two-alternative forced-choice tasks. , 2006, Psychological review.

[21]  J. Andel Sequential Analysis , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[22]  Donald Laming,et al.  Information theory of choice-reaction times , 1968 .

[23]  Desmond J. Higham,et al.  An Algorithmic Introduction to Numerical Simulation of Stochastic Differential Equations , 2001, SIAM Rev..

[24]  Jeffrey D. Schall,et al.  Neural basis of deciding, choosing and acting , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[25]  Xiao-Jing Wang,et al.  Probabilistic Decision Making by Slow Reverberation in Cortical Circuits , 2002, Neuron.

[26]  M. Shadlen,et al.  Response of Neurons in the Lateral Intraparietal Area during a Combined Visual Discrimination Reaction Time Task , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  J. Gold,et al.  Neural computations that underlie decisions about sensory stimuli , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[28]  Bernt Øksendal,et al.  Stochastic differential equations (3rd ed.): an introduction with applications , 1992 .

[29]  B. Øksendal Stochastic Differential Equations , 1985 .

[30]  W. Newsome,et al.  Neural basis of a perceptual decision in the parietal cortex (area LIP) of the rhesus monkey. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  P. Dayan,et al.  journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/visres Selective Bayes: Attentional load and crowding , 2022 .

[32]  Cameron S. Carter,et al.  Dopamine and the mechanisms of cognition: Part I. A neural network model predicting dopamine effects on selective attention , 1998, Biological Psychiatry.

[33]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A parallel distributed processing approach to automaticity. , 1992, The American journal of psychology.

[34]  J I Gold,et al.  On diffusion processes with variable drift rates as models for decision making during learning , 2008, New journal of physics.

[35]  Philip Holmes,et al.  Optimal Decisions: From Neural Spikes, through Stochastic Differential Equations, to Behavior , 2005, IEICE Trans. Fundam. Electron. Commun. Comput. Sci..

[36]  Kevin N. Gurney,et al.  The Basal Ganglia and Cortex Implement Optimal Decision Making Between Alternative Actions , 2007, Neural Computation.

[37]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .

[38]  James L. McClelland,et al.  On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. , 1990, Psychological review.