Classifying and Mapping Forest Cover Types Using Ikonos Imagery in the Northeastern United States

Accurately mapping forest cover types in the northeast using remotely sensed data has proven problematic. High species diversity and spatial variability make creating training areas of spectrally “pure” classes of forest cover types difficult. The advancement of higher spatial resolution satellite sensors have historically allowed for increases in the accuracies of mapping forest cover types. These accuracies have been further increased by image processing techniques such as hybrid forms of the supervised and unsupervised classification methods. However, since the launch of very high resolution (VHR) sensors (≤4m) such as IKONOS, traditional per-pixel automated classification has not always worked well. While increases in spatial resolution create increased amounts of informational detail, this also creates higher within class spectral variability, potentially causing lower classification accuracies when solely using per-pixel classification techniques based upon spectral comparisons. By incorporating other image processing techniques such as texture into automated classification, the increased within class spectral variability inherent to very high resolution images may increase our ability to discern relatively homogeneous clusters of pixels. Segmenting images into clusters of unique texture followed by classifying those clusters based on their spectral response patterns is a potential method for both: 1) increasing the accuracy of utilizing very high resolution images for classification, and 2) increasing the accuracy of mapping forest cover types in the northeast. Preliminary results considered in the context of an index indicate that the per-segment approach to forest cover type classification yields a significantly better accuracy compared to the per-pixel approach.

[1]  Alexandre Carleer,et al.  Exploitation of Very High Resolution Satellite Data for Tree Species Identification , 2004 .

[2]  F. H. Eyre,et al.  Forest cover types of the United States and Canada , 1980 .

[3]  Agustin Lobo,et al.  Image segmentation and discriminant analysis for the identification of land cover units in ecology , 1997, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[4]  Christine Farcy,et al.  Ikonos-2 imagery potential for forest stands mapping , 2002 .

[5]  Peter T. Wolter,et al.  Improved forest classification in the northern Lake States using multi-temporal Landsat imagery , 1995 .

[6]  Rachel Riemann Hershey,et al.  Aerial photo guide to New England forest cover types , 1995 .

[7]  Pol Coppin,et al.  Satellite inventory of Minnesota forest resources , 1994 .

[8]  R. Fournier,et al.  Remote sensing and the measurement of geographical entities in a forested environment. 2. The optimal spatial resolution , 1994 .

[9]  M. E. Bauer,et al.  Classification of forest vegetation in north-central Minnesota using Landsat multispectral scanner and thematic mapper data. , 1990 .

[10]  David E. Hibbs WILDLANDS AND WOODLOTS: THE STORY OF NEW ENGLAND'S FORESTS , 1983, Landscape Journal.

[11]  Paul V. Bolstad,et al.  Improved classification of forest vegetation in northern Wisconsin through a rule-based combination of soils, terrain, and Landsat Thematic Mapper data , 1992 .

[12]  I. Gitas,et al.  Object-oriented classification modelling for fuel type mapping in the Mediterranean, using LANDSAT TM and IKONOS imagery- preliminary results , 2002 .

[13]  Andrew K. Skidmore,et al.  Forest mapping accuracies are improved using a supervised nonparametric classifier with SPOT data , 1988 .

[14]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  Applying Spatial Autocorrelation Analysis to Evaluate Error in New England Forest-Cover-Type Maps Derived from Landsat Thematic Mapper Data , 2001 .

[15]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data : principles and practices , 1998 .

[16]  R. Congalton,et al.  Evaluating seasonal variability as an aid to cover-type mapping from Landsat Thematic Mapper data in the Northeast , 1995 .

[17]  Darrel L. Williams,et al.  The effects of spatial resolution on the classification of Thematic Mapper data , 1985 .

[18]  John R. Jensen,et al.  Introductory Digital Image Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective , 1986 .

[19]  Charles E. Olson,et al.  The significance of spatial resolution: Identifying forest cover from satellite data , 2001 .

[20]  M. Abrams Effects of spatial resolution , 1982 .

[21]  Jams L. Cushnie The interactive effect of spatial resolution and degree of internal variability within land-cover types on classification accuracies , 1987 .

[22]  R. Congalton,et al.  Sampling Method and Sample Placement: How Do They Affect the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed Maps? , 2003 .

[23]  K. Johnsson Segment-based land-use classification from SPOT satellite data , 1994 .

[24]  S. Franklin Using spatial Co-occurrence texture to increase forest structure and species composition classification accuracy , 2001 .