Human-robot proxemics: Physical and psychological distancing in human-robot interaction

To seamlessly integrate into the human physical and social environment, robots must display appropriate proxemic behavior-that is, follow societal norms in establishing their physical and psychological distancing with people. Social-scientific theories suggest competing models of human proxemic behavior, but all conclude that individuals' proxemic behavior is shaped by the proxemic behavior of others and the individual's psychological closeness to them. The present study explores whether these models can also explain how people physically and psychologically distance themselves from robots and suggest guidelines for future design of proxemic behaviors for robots. In a controlled laboratory experiment, participants interacted with Wakamaru to perform two tasks that examined physical and psychological distancing of the participants. We manipulated the likeability (likeable/dislikeable) and gaze behavior (mutual gaze/averted gaze) of the robot. Our results on physical distancing showed that participants who disliked the robot compensated for the increase in the robot's gaze by maintaining a greater physical distance from the robot, while participants who liked the robot did not differ in their distancing from the robot across gaze conditions. The results on psychological distancing suggest that those who disliked the robot also disclosed less to the robot. Our results offer guidelines for the design of appropriate proxemic behaviors for robots so as to facilitate effective human-robot interaction.

[1]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  Equilibrium Theory Revisited: Mutual Gaze and Personal Space in Virtual Environments , 2001, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[2]  J. Baxter.  Interpersonal spacing in natural settings. , 1970, Sociometry.

[3]  Leila Takayama,et al.  Influences on proxemic behaviors in human-robot interaction , 2009, 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[4]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Nonverbal leakage in robots: Communication of intentions through seemingly unintentional behavior , 2009, 2009 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[5]  H. Ehrlichman,et al.  Interpersonal Gaze and Helping Behavior. , 1979, The Journal of social psychology.

[6]  K. Kaplan,et al.  Structure and process in interpersonal “distancing” , 1977 .

[7]  M. E. Shaw,et al.  Affective reactions to interpersonal distances by friends and strangers , 1980 .

[8]  S. Jourard,et al.  Experimenter-subject "distance" and self-disclosure. , 1970, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  Bilge Mutlu,et al.  Robots in organizations: The role of workflow, social, and environmental factors in human-robot interaction , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[10]  D. Byrne.  The Attraction Paradigm , 1971 .

[11]  Leslie A. Hayduk,et al.  The shape of personal space: An experimental investigation. , 1981 .

[12]  A. Gouldner.  THE NORM OF RECIPROCITY: A PRELIMINARY STATEMENT * , 1960 .

[13]  I. Firestone,et al.  Reconciling verbal and nonverbal models of dyadic communication , 1977 .

[14]  John R. Aiello,et al.  A further look at equilibrium theory: Visual interaction as a function of interpersonal distance , 1977 .

[15]  M. Patterson.  An arousal model of interpersonal intimacy. , 1976 .

[16]  Leonore Loeb Adler,et al.  Interpersonal Distance as a Function of Task Difficulty, Praise, Status Orientation, and Sex of Partner , 1974 .

[17]  Jacob L. Moreno,et al.  Group psychotherapy : a symposium , 1947 .

[18]  K. Kaplan,et al.  Distancing in Dyads: A Comparison of Four Models , 1983 .

[19]  David Lee,et al.  The influence of subjects' personality traits on personal spatial zones in a human-robot interaction experiment , 2005, ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005..

[20]  E. Hall,et al.  The Hidden Dimension , 1970 .

[21]  L. Hayduk.  Personal space: Where we now stand. , 1983 .

[22]  M. Argyle,et al.  EYE-CONTACT, DISTANCE AND AFFILIATION. , 1965, Sociometry.