A latitudinal gradient in large-scale beta diversity for vascular plants in North America.

Species turnover, or beta diversity, has been predicted to decrease with increasing latitude, but few studies have tested this relationship. Here, we examined the beta diversity-latitude relationship for vascular plants at a continental scale, based on complete species lists of native vascular plants for entire states or provinces in North America (north of Mexico). We calculated beta diversity as the slope of the relationship between the natural logarithm of the Jaccard index (lnJ ) for families, genera or species, and both geographic distance and climate difference within five latitude zones. We found that beta diversity decreased from south to north; within latitude zones, it decreased from species to genera and families. Geographic and climatic distance explained about the same proportion of the variance in lnJ in zones south of c. 50 degrees N. North of this latitude, nearly all the explained variance in lnJ was attributable to geographic distance. Therefore, decreasing beta diversity from south to north reflects decreasing climate differentiation within more northerly latitude zones, and primarily post-glacial dispersal limitation north of 50 degrees N.

[1]  H. Qian.  Large‐scale biogeographic patterns of vascular plant richness in North America: an analysis at the generic level , 1998 .

[2]  K. Klinka,et al.  Longitudinal patterns of plant diversity in the North American boreal forest , 1998, Plant Ecology.

[3]  P. White,et al.  The distance decay of similarity in biogeography and ecology , 1999 .

[4]  Wilhelm Barthlott,et al.  Global distribution of species diversity in vascular plants : towards a world map of phytodiversity , 1996 .

[5]  Stephen P. Hubbell,et al.  Beta-Diversity in Tropical Forest Trees , 2002, Science.

[6]  R. Ricklefs,et al.  Beta diversity of angiosperms in temperate floras of eastern Asia and eastern North America , 2004 .

[7]  Richard Field,et al.  Predictions and tests of climate‐based hypotheses of broad‐scale variation in taxonomic richness , 2004 .

[8]  Helmut Hillebrand,et al.  On the Generality of the Latitudinal Diversity Gradient , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[9]  F. Woodward,et al.  Patterns in tree species richness as a test of the glacial extinction hypothesis , 1989, Nature.

[10]  G. C. Stevens.  The Latitudinal Gradient in Geographical Range: How so Many Species Coexist in the Tropics , 1989, The American Naturalist.

[11]  P. Jones,et al.  Representing Twentieth-Century Space–Time Climate Variability. Part I: Development of a 1961–90 Mean Monthly Terrestrial Climatology , 1999 .

[12]  D. Jablonski,et al.  Geographical range and speciation in fossil and living molluscs , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  G. Graves,et al.  Multiscale assessment of patterns of avian species richness , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  J. Svenning,et al.  Limited filling of the potential range in European tree species , 2004 .

[15]  E. Pianka.  Latitudinal Gradients in Species Diversity: A Review of Concepts , 1966, The American Naturalist.

[16]  K. Gaston,et al.  Are there latitudinal gradients in species turnover , 2003 .

[17]  David J. Currie,et al.  Large-scale biogeographical patterns of species richness of trees , 1987, Nature.

[18]  Mark Vellend,et al.  Do commonly used indices of β‐diversity measure species turnover? , 2001 .

[19]  R. Ricklefs,et al.  Geographical distribution and ecological conservatism of disjunct genera of vascular plants in eastern Asia and eastern North America , 2004 .

[20]  Nancy Knowlton,et al.  Evolution and the latitudinal diversity gradient: speciation, extinction and biogeography. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[21]  K. Rohde.  Latitudinal gradients in species diversity: the search for the primary cause , 1992 .

[22]  P. Rodríguez,et al.  Beta diversity and latitude in North American mammals: testing the hypothesis of covariation , 2004 .

[23]  A. Pitman,et al.  Global patterns in seed size , 2006 .

[24]  I. Chuine,et al.  Niche breadth, competitive strength and range size of tree species: a trade-off based framework to understand species distribution. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[25]  H. Hillebrand,et al.  The imprint of the geographical, evolutionary and ecological context on species-area relationships. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[26]  LATITUDINAL VARIATION IN GENETIC DIVERGENCE OF POPULATIONS AND THE POTENTIAL FOR FUTURE SPECIATION , 2004, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.