The TanDEM-X DEM Mosaicking: Fusion of Multiple Acquisitions Using InSAR Quality Parameters

Since 2010, TanDEM-X and its twin satellite TerraSAR-X fly in a close orbit formation and form a single-pass synthetic aperture radar (SAR) interferometer. The formation was established to acquire a global high-precision digital elevation model (DEM) using SAR interferometry (InSAR). In order to achieve the required height accuracy of the TanDEM-X DEM, at least two global coverages have to be acquired. However, in difficult and mountainous terrain, up to five coverages are present. Here, acquisitions from ascending and descending orbits are needed to fill gaps and to overcome geometric limitations. Therefore, a strategy to properly combine the available height estimates is mandatory. The objective of this paper is the presentation of the operational TanDEM-X DEM mosaicking approach. In general, multiple InSAR DEM heights are combined by means of a weighted average with the height error as weight. Apart from this widely used mosaicking approach, one big challenge remains with the handling of larger height discrepancies between the input data, which are mainly caused by phase unwrapping errors, but also by temporal changes between acquisitions. In the case of inconsistencies, the TanDEM-X mosaicking approach performs a grouping into height levels. A priority concept is set up to evaluate the different groups of heights considering the number of DEMs and several InSAR quality parameters: the height error, the phase unwrapping method, and the height of ambiguity. This allows the identification of the most reliable height level for mosaicking. This fusion concept is verified on different test areas affected by phase unwrapping errors in flat and mountainous terrain as well as by height discrepancies in forests. The results show that the quality of the final TanDEM-X DEM mosaic benefits a lot from this mosaicking approach.

[1]  Gerhard Krieger,et al.  Bistatic system and baseline calibration in TanDEM-X to ensure the global digital elevation model quality , 2012 .

[2]  Helko Breit,et al.  Interferometric processing of TanDEM-X data , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[3]  Michael Eineder,et al.  TanDEM-X calibrated Raw DEM generation , 2012 .

[4]  Gerhard Krieger,et al.  TanDEM-X: A Satellite Formation for High-Resolution SAR Interferometry , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[5]  A. Roth,et al.  Design of the DEM Mosaicking and Calibration Processor for TanDEM-X , 2008 .

[6]  Gerhard Krieger,et al.  Coherence evaluation of TanDEM-X interferometric data , 2012 .

[7]  Gerhard Krieger,et al.  Development of the TanDEM-X Calibration Concept: Analysis of Systematic Errors , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[8]  Gerhard Krieger,et al.  First 2 years of TanDEM‐X mission: Interferometric performance overview , 2013 .

[9]  Maria Donata Polimeni,et al.  TanDEM-X: DEM Acquisition in the Third Year Era , 2013 .

[10]  H. Zwally,et al.  Overview of ICESat's Laser Measurements of Polar Ice, Atmosphere, Ocean, and Land , 2002 .

[11]  Helko Breit,et al.  The dual-baseline interferometric processing chain for the TanDEM-X mission , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[12]  R. Treuhaft,et al.  Vertical structure of vegetated land surfaces from interferometric and polarimetric radar , 2000 .

[13]  Achim Roth,et al.  Operational TanDEM-X DEM calibration and first validation results , 2012 .

[14]  Birgit Wessel,et al.  TanDEM-X Ground Segment – DEM Products Specification Document , 2013 .

[15]  Helko Breit,et al.  Interferometric processing and products of the TanDEM-X mission , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[16]  Anna Wendleder,et al.  Validation of the absolute height accuracy of TanDEM-X DEM for moderate terrain , 2014, 2014 IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[17]  Achim Roth,et al.  Mosaicking of Digital Elevation Models derived by SAR Interferometry , 1998 .

[18]  Michael Eineder,et al.  Dual-Baseline Phase Unwrapping Challenges in the TanDEM-X Mission , 2014 .

[19]  Gerhard Krieger,et al.  TanDEM-X Performance over Sandy Areas , 2014 .

[20]  Michael Eineder,et al.  Phase unwrapping correction with dual-baseline data for the TanDEM-X mission , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[21]  Birgit Wessel,et al.  The approach for combining dem acquisitions for the TanDEM-X dem mosaic , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium - IGARSS.

[22]  K. C. Jezek,et al.  RADARSAT: the Antarctic Mapping Project , 1996, IGARSS '96. 1996 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[23]  Gerhard Krieger,et al.  TanDEM-X: The New Global DEM Takes Shape , 2014, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine.

[24]  RADARSAT Antarctic Mapping Project-mosaic construction , 1999, IEEE 1999 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. IGARSS'99 (Cat. No.99CH36293).

[25]  M. Younis,et al.  The TanDEM-X mission: A satellite formation for high-resolution SAR interferometry , 2007, 2007 European Radar Conference.

[26]  Konrad Schindler,et al.  Fusion of Digital Elevation Models Using Sparse Representations , 2011, PIA.

[27]  Peter Reinartz,et al.  TOWARDS A GLOBAL ELEVATION PRODUCT: COMBINATION OF MULTI-SOURCE DIGITAL ELEVATION MODELS , 2002 .

[28]  David A. Seal,et al.  The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission , 2007 .