Visual attention pooling and understanding the structural similarity index in multi-scale analysis

We present a novel spatial pooling strategy and the results of an extensive multi-scale analysis of the well-known structural similarity index metric (SSIM) for objective image quality evaluation. We show, in contrast with some previous studies, that even relatively simple perceptual importance pooling strategies can significantly improve objective metric performance evaluated as the correlation with subjective quality assessment. In particular, we define an attention and quality driven pooling mechanism that focuses structural comparisons within the SSIM model to only those pixels exhibiting significant structural degradations. We show that optimal objective metric performance is achieved over very sparse spatial domains indeed that ignore most of the signal data. We also investigate an explicit breakdown of the structural models within SSIM and show that in combination with the proposed attention and quality driven pooling some of these models represent well performing metrics in their own right, when applied at appropriate scale for which there may not be a single optimal value. Our experiments demonstrate that the augmented SSIM metric using the proposed pooling model provides performance advantage on an extensive LIVE dataset covering hundreds of degraded images and 5 different distortion types compared to both conventional SSIM and state-of-the-art objective quality metrics.

[1]  Chaofeng Li,et al.  Content-partitioned structural similarity index for image quality assessment , 2010, Signal Process. Image Commun..

[2]  Yuukou Horita,et al.  Impact of subjective dataset on the performance of image quality metrics , 2008, 2008 15th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[3]  Sheila S. Hemami,et al.  Understanding and simplifying the structural similarity metric , 2008, 2008 15th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[4]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Spatial Pooling Strategies for Perceptual Image Quality Assessment , 2006, 2006 International Conference on Image Processing.

[5]  A. Bovik,et al.  A universal image quality index , 2002, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[6]  Li Cui,et al.  An Image Quality Metric based on Corner, Edge and Symmetry Maps , 2008, BMVC.

[7]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Video Quality Pooling Adaptive to Perceptual Distortion Severity , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[8]  Matthew G. Reyes,et al.  Structural texture similarity metrics for retrieval applications , 2008, 2008 15th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[9]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Information Content Weighting for Perceptual Image Quality Assessment , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[10]  Eric C. Larson,et al.  Most apparent distortion: full-reference image quality assessment and the role of strategy , 2010, J. Electronic Imaging.

[11]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Applications of Objective Image Quality Assessment Methods , 2011 .

[12]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[13]  Ahmet M. Eskicioglu,et al.  An SVD-based grayscale image quality measure for local and global assessment , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[14]  Patrick Le Callet,et al.  Subjective quality assessment IRCCyN/IVC database , 2004 .

[15]  Sheila S. Hemami,et al.  VSNR: A Wavelet-Based Visual Signal-to-Noise Ratio for Natural Images , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[16]  Boban P. Bondzulic,et al.  Additive models and separable pooling, a new look at structural similarity , 2014, Signal Process..

[17]  Chun-Ling Yang,et al.  Gradient-Based Structural Similarity for Image Quality Assessment , 2006, 2006 International Conference on Image Processing.

[18]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  A Statistical Evaluation of Recent Full Reference Image Quality Assessment Algorithms , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[19]  Patrick Le Callet,et al.  Does where you Gaze on an Image Affect your Perception of Quality? Applying Visual Attention to Image Quality Metric , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[20]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Visual Importance Pooling for Image Quality Assessment , 2009, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[21]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Mean squared error: Love it or leave it? A new look at Signal Fidelity Measures , 2009, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[22]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Multi-scale structural similarity for image quality assessment , 2003 .