Bioenergy production and sustainable development: science base for policymaking remains limited

The possibility of using bioenergy as a climate change mitigation measure has sparked a discussion of whether and how bioenergy production contributes to sustainable development. We undertook a systematic review of the scientific literature to illuminate this relationship and found a limited scientific basis for policymaking. Our results indicate that knowledge on the sustainable development impacts of bioenergy production is concentrated in a few well‐studied countries, focuses on environmental and economic impacts, and mostly relates to dedicated agricultural biomass plantations. The scope and methodological approaches in studies differ widely and only a small share of the studies sufficiently reports on context and/or baseline conditions, which makes it difficult to get a general understanding of the attribution of impacts. Nevertheless, we identified regional patterns of positive or negative impacts for all categories – environmental, economic, institutional, social and technological. In general, economic and technological impacts were more frequently reported as positive, while social and environmental impacts were more frequently reported as negative (with the exception of impacts on direct substitution of GHG emission from fossil fuel). More focused and transparent research is needed to validate these patterns and develop a strong science underpinning for establishing policies and governance agreements that prevent/mitigate negative and promote positive impacts from bioenergy production.

[1]  Nicholas J. Mercuro,et al.  When Values Conflict: Essays on Environmental Analysis, Discourse, and Decision , 1978 .

[2]  R. K. Dixon,et al.  Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change , 1998 .

[3]  E. Hertwich,et al.  Technical Summary , 2022, The Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate.

[4]  M. Petticrew,et al.  Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide , 2005 .

[5]  Y. Lacasse,et al.  From the authors , 2005, European Respiratory Journal.

[6]  R. Howarth,et al.  Sustainable development in a post-Brundtland world , 2006 .

[7]  A. Faaij,et al.  A bottom-up assessment and review of global bio-energy potentials to 2050 , 2007 .

[8]  William F. Laurance,et al.  How Green Are Biofuels? , 2008, Science.

[9]  William F. Laurance,et al.  How Green Are Biofuels? , 2008, Science.

[10]  Martijn Gough Climate change , 2009, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[11]  L. Lynd,et al.  Beneficial Biofuels—The Food, Energy, and Environment Trilemma , 2009, Science.

[12]  R. Howarth,et al.  Limitations of integrated assessment models of climate change , 2009 .

[13]  Wim Turkenburg,et al.  Exploration of regional and global cost–supply curves of biomass energy from short-rotation crops at abandoned cropland and rest land under four IPCC SRES land-use scenarios , 2009 .

[14]  M. Delucchi,et al.  Impacts of biofuels on climate change, water use, and land use , 2010, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[15]  C. Kemfert,et al.  An overview of biofuel policies across the world , 2010 .

[16]  Jay Sterling Gregg,et al.  Global and regional potential for bioenergy from agricultural and forestry residue biomass , 2010 .

[17]  W. Hillegass,et al.  Overview, Strengths, and Limitations of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses , 2010 .

[18]  A. Faaij,et al.  The impact of sustainability criteria on the costs and potentials of bioenergy production : applied for case studies in Brazil and Ukraine , 2010 .

[19]  K. Neville,et al.  Forests, food, and fuel in the tropics: the uneven social and ecological consequences of the emerging political economy of biofuels , 2010, The Journal of peasant studies.

[20]  Laura German,et al.  The Local Social and Environmental Impacts of Smallholder-Based Biofuel Investments in Zambia , 2011 .

[21]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  Global bioenergy potentials from agricultural land in 2050: Sensitivity to climate change, diets and yields , 2011, Biomass & bioenergy.

[22]  R. Campanella,et al.  Coupled Vulnerability and Resilience: the Dynamics of Cross-Scale Interactions in Post-Katrina New Orleans , 2011 .

[23]  E. Lambin,et al.  INAUGURAL ARTICLE by a Recently Elected Academy Member:Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity , 2011 .

[24]  T. Beringer,et al.  On sustainability of bioenergy production: integrating co-emissions from agricultural intensification. , 2011 .

[25]  Emma Nehrenheim,et al.  Land application of organic waste – Effects on the soil ecosystem , 2011 .

[26]  T. Beringer,et al.  Bioenergy production potential of global biomass plantations under environmental and agricultural constraints , 2011 .

[27]  Annie Levasseur,et al.  Key issues and options in accounting for carbon sequestration and temporary storage in life cycle assessment and carbon footprinting , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[28]  E. Stehfest,et al.  An evaluation of the global potential of bioenergy production on degraded lands , 2012 .

[29]  Steven W. Running,et al.  Bioenergy: how much can we expect for 2050? , 2013 .

[30]  S. Rose,et al.  The Potential for REDD+: Key Economic Modeling Insights and Issues , 2013, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.

[31]  F. Creutzig,et al.  Integrating place-specific livelihood and equity outcomes into global assessments of bioenergy deployment , 2013 .

[32]  B. Muys Sustainable development within planetary boundaries: a functional revision of the definition based on the thermodynamics of complex social-ecological systems , 2013 .

[33]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  Global human appropriation of net primary production doubled in the 20th century , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  J. Hodbod,et al.  Demystifying the Social Impacts of Biofuels at Local Levels: Where is the Evidence? , 2013 .

[35]  Christian Gamborg,et al.  Ethical and legal challenges in bioenergy governance: coping with value disagreement and regulatory complexity. , 2014 .

[36]  L. Clarke,et al.  Assessing Transformation Pathways , 2014 .

[37]  Edgar G. Hertwich,et al.  Understanding the Climate Mitigation Benefits of Product Systems: Comment on “Using Attributional Life Cycle Assessment to Estimate Climate‐Change Mitigation…” , 2014 .

[38]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[39]  N. H. Ravindranath,et al.  Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use (AFOLU) , 2014 .

[40]  Pete Smith,et al.  Co‐benefits, trade‐offs, barriers and policies for greenhouse gas mitigation in the agriculture, forestry and other land use (AFOLU) sector , 2014, Global change biology.

[41]  O. Edenhofer,et al.  Climate change 2014 : mitigation of climate change , 2014 .

[42]  Mark A. Delucchi,et al.  Response to Comments on “Using Attributional Life Cycle Assessment to Estimate Climate‐Change Mitigation …” , 2014 .

[43]  R. K. Larsen,et al.  Towards ‘hybrid accountability’ in EU biofuels policy? Community grievances and competing water claims in the Central Kalimantan oil palm sector , 2014 .

[44]  F. Creutzig,et al.  Using Attributional Life Cycle Assessment to Estimate Climate‐Change Mitigation Benefits Misleads Policy Makers , 2014 .

[45]  Donald R Ort,et al.  The theoretical limit to plant productivity. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[46]  Felix Creutzig,et al.  Livelihood impacts of biofuel crop production: Implications for governance , 2014 .

[47]  Ottmar Edenhofer,et al.  Technical Summary In: Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Technical Report , 2014 .

[48]  Christoph Schmitz,et al.  Impacts of increased bioenergy demand on global food markets: an AgMIP economic model intercomparison , 2014 .

[49]  H. Haberl The Growing Role of Biomass for Future Resource Supply—Prospects and Pitfalls , 2015 .

[50]  Jorge Islas,et al.  Sustainable bioenergy options for Mexico: GHG mitigation and costs , 2015 .

[51]  Edgar G. Hertwich,et al.  Integrating Global Climate Change Mitigation Goals with Other Sustainability Objectives: A Synthesis , 2015 .

[52]  C. Flachsland Mitigation of Climate Change: Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2015 .

[53]  N. H. Ravindranath,et al.  Bioenergy and climate change mitigation: an assessment , 2015 .

[54]  Wendell de Queiroz Lamas,et al.  Energy balance analysis of the Brazilian alcohol for flex fuel production , 2015 .

[55]  H. Haberl Competition for land: A sociometabolic perspective , 2015 .

[56]  U. Martin Persson,et al.  The impact of biofuel demand on agricultural commodity prices: a systematic review , 2015 .

[57]  V. Dale,et al.  A framework for selecting indicators of bioenergy sustainability , 2015 .

[58]  B. Weidema,et al.  Rebuttal to ‘Indirect land use change (iLUC) within life cycle assessment (LCA) – scientific robustness and consistency with international standards’ , 2015 .

[59]  Ying Liu,et al.  21st century United States emissions mitigation could increase water stress more than the climate change it is mitigating , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[60]  F. Creutzig Economic and ecological views on climate change mitigation with bioenergy and negative emissions , 2016 .

[61]  B. Nyenzi,et al.  GLOSSARY , 2019, Evidence-Based Dentistry.