Applications of MCDM methods in research on corporate sustainability

Corporate sustainability (CS) is becoming a popular research topic. In recent years, researchers have conducted a significant number of studies in this area. Although a number of those studies have used a variety of multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) methods, to date there is no systematic literature review of this area of research. This paper fulfills this research gap.,The authors use a systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis approach to analyze the applications of MCDM methods in research on CS.,The authors have observed that both single and integrated MCDM methods have been used in this domain; however, single MCDM methods are dominant. Further, this review shows that most of the integrated methods use only two MCDM methods and that there has been no comparison of results obtained from different MCDM methods. After reviewing these developments and summarizing the findings, the authors propose directions for future research, including investigating and formulating strategies for specific CS initiatives, integrating three or more MCDM methods, integrating MCDM methods with optimization techniques, analyzing results from a small and medium-sized enterprise (SME) perspective, reconsidering the tenets of existing theories via MCDM methods, and comparing the results of studies of CS in different kinds of economies, as well as the results of using different MCDM methods.,To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first study that has conducted a systematic literature review to analyze applications of MCDM methods to different aspects of corporate sustainability, including enablers of and barriers to CS, the evaluation and design of CS initiatives, system or strategy formulation, and performance evaluation, among others.

[1]  Mohammad Ali Beheshtinia,et al.  A novel MCDM model for prioritizing the renewable power plants’ construction , 2019, Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal.

[2]  Valério A.P. Salomon,et al.  Multi-criteria sustainability performance measurement: an application in Cuba , 2015 .

[3]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Social sustainable supplier evaluation and selection: a group decision-support approach , 2019, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[4]  Mark Stevenson,et al.  A review of supply chain risk management: definition, theory, and research agenda , 2018 .

[5]  Solange Garcia,et al.  Corporate sustainability management: a proposed multi-criteria model to support balanced decision-making , 2016 .

[6]  Kuldip Singh Sangwan,et al.  A fuzzy-based decision support framework for product recovery process selection in reverse logistics , 2016 .

[7]  Amelia Bilbao-Terol,et al.  Multi-criteria analysis of the GRI sustainability reports: an application to Socially Responsible Investment , 2018, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[8]  Tasmia Jannat Tumpa,et al.  Barriers to green supply chain management: An emerging economy context , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[9]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Proposing a new integrated model based on sustainability balanced scorecard (SBSC) and MCDM approaches by using linguistic variables for the performance evaluation of oil producing companies , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[10]  Samarjit Kar,et al.  Measuring Corporate Social Responsibility Based on Fuzzy Analytic Networking Process-Based Balance Scorecard Model , 2018, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[11]  R. Siew,et al.  A review of corporate sustainability reporting tools (SRTs). , 2015, Journal of environmental management.

[12]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Investing in lean manufacturing practices: an environmental and operational perspective , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[13]  Bruno S. Silvestre,et al.  Challenges for sustainable supply chain management: When stakeholder collaboration becomes conducive to corruption , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[14]  Seleshi Sisaye,et al.  Corporate sustainability: historical development and reporting practices , 2012 .

[15]  Roberta Costa,et al.  A multidimensional approach for CSR assessment: The importance of the stakeholder perception , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[16]  Ashraf Labib,et al.  From vicious to virtuous circles: problem structuring for quantified decision making in operationalization of corporate social responsibility , 2017, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[17]  Ming-Lang Tseng,et al.  Improving corporate sustainable development by using an interdependent closed-loop hierarchical structure , 2017 .

[18]  Abdullah S. Karaman,et al.  Taking-off corporate social responsibility programs: An AHP application in airline industry , 2017 .

[19]  Elena Escrig-Olmedo,et al.  Measuring Corporate Environmental Performance: A Methodology for Sustainable Development , 2017 .

[20]  Jairo R. Montoya-Torres,et al.  Multi-criteria approaches for urban passenger transport systems: a literature review , 2015, Ann. Oper. Res..

[21]  Haris Ch. Doukas,et al.  Linguistic multi-criteria decision making for energy and environmental corporate policy , 2014, Inf. Sci..

[22]  Ayse Kucuk Yilmaz,et al.  Prioritisation of factors contributing to human error for airworthiness management strategy with ANP , 2019 .

[23]  Ana Maria Esteves,et al.  Evaluating community investments in the mining sector using multi-criteria decision analysis to integrate SIA with business planning , 2008 .

[24]  Nuray Tezcan,et al.  Multidimensional comprehensive corporate sustainability performance evaluation model: Evidence from an emerging market banking sector , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[25]  R. Sterling,et al.  Development of a Global Energy Management System for non-energy intensive multi-site industrial organisations: A methodology , 2017 .

[26]  C. Sheu,et al.  Social capital, information sharing and performance: Evidence from China , 2014 .

[27]  Chunqiao Tan,et al.  An Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model Based on Prospect Theory for Green Supplier Selection under Uncertain Environment: A Case Study of the Thailand Palm Oil Products Industry , 2019, Sustainability.

[28]  Dongping Fang,et al.  Selection of the approach for producing a weighting scheme for the CSR evaluation framework , 2015 .

[29]  Daniel A. Friess,et al.  Stakeholder preferences for payments for ecosystem services (PES) versus other environmental management approaches for mangrove forests. , 2019, Journal of environmental management.

[30]  Xiaowei Xu,et al.  Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[31]  Rajesh K. Singh,et al.  Analyzing disposition strategies in reverse supply chains: fuzzy TOPSIS approach , 2018 .

[32]  Santoso Wibowo,et al.  Consensus-based decision support for multicriteria group decision making , 2013, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[33]  Dinesh Kumar,et al.  Assessment of CSR based supply chain performance system using an integrated fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS approach , 2018 .

[34]  W. Hsu,et al.  The sustainability balanced scorecard as a framework for selecting socially responsible investment: an effective MCDM model , 2009, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[35]  Donald Huisingh,et al.  A review of ‘theories of the firm’ and their contributions to Corporate Sustainability , 2015 .

[36]  J. Sarkis,et al.  A supply chain sustainability innovation framework and evaluation methodology , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[37]  Su‐Yol Lee Drivers for the participation of small and medium‐sized suppliers in green supply chain initiatives , 2008 .

[38]  Z. Rahman,et al.  Identification and prioritization of corporate sustainability practices using analytical hierarchy process , 2015 .

[39]  Carlos Mataix,et al.  The analytic hierarchy process to support decision-making processes in infrastructure projects with social impact , 2013 .

[40]  Vicente Liern,et al.  Ranking corporate sustainability: a flexible multidimensional approach based on linguistic variables , 2018, Int. Trans. Oper. Res..

[41]  S. Goyal,et al.  A DEMATEL based approach for investigating barriers in green supply chain management in Canadian manufacturing firms , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[42]  K. Govindan,et al.  Supplier selection based on corporate social responsibility practices , 2016, International Journal of Production Economics.

[43]  Sachin S. Kamble,et al.  The application of Delphi and AHP method in environmentally conscious solid waste treatment and disposal technology selection , 2016 .

[44]  Rakesh D. Raut,et al.  An ISM approach for the barrier analysis in implementing sustainable practices: The Indian oil and gas sector , 2018 .

[45]  C. Searcy Corporate Sustainability Performance Measurement Systems: A Review and Research Agenda , 2012 .

[46]  Jose M. Cruz,et al.  Modeling the relationship of globalized supply chains and corporate social responsibility , 2013 .

[47]  Chung-Hsing Yeh,et al.  Sustainable planning of e-waste recycling activities using fuzzy multicriteria decision making , 2013 .

[48]  Sin-Jin Lin,et al.  A Fusion Approach for Exploring the Key Factors of Corporate Governance on Corporate Social Responsibility Performance , 2018 .

[49]  George M. Hornberger,et al.  Using triple bottom line metrics and multi-criteria methodology in corporate settings , 2018 .

[50]  Sun Mei,et al.  Corporate Sustainable Development Assessment Base on the Corporate Social Responsibility , 2011 .

[51]  Alessandra Magrini,et al.  Multi-criteria decision-making to support sustainable water management in a mining complex in Brazil , 2013 .

[52]  Jose M. Cruz,et al.  The impact of corporate social responsibility in supply chain management: Multicriteria decision-making approach , 2009, Decis. Support Syst..

[53]  Holger R. Maier,et al.  Reliability-Based Approach to Multicriteria Decision Analysis for Water Resources , 2004 .

[54]  Santoso Wibowo,et al.  Multi-criteria group decision making for evaluating the performance of e-waste recycling programs under uncertainty. , 2015, Waste management.

[55]  Jutta Geldermann,et al.  Multi-criteria decision support based on iterative comparisons with reference points , 2016 .

[56]  Suresh Garg,et al.  Integrating analytic hierarchy process in corporate social responsibility measurement , 2017 .

[57]  Pravin P. Patil,et al.  Logistics and distribution challenges to managing operations for corporate sustainability: Study on leading Indian diary organizations , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[58]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Multiple criteria decision-making techniques in transportation systems: a systematic review of the state of the art literature , 2015 .

[59]  Kannan Govindan,et al.  Evaluating the drivers of corporate social responsibility in the mining industry with multi-criteria approach: A multi-stakeholder perspective , 2014 .

[60]  Güler Aras,et al.  Corporate sustainability measurement based on entropy weight and TOPSIS: A Turkish banking case study , 2017 .

[61]  Rakesh D. Raut,et al.  Sustainability in The Banking Industry: A Strategic Multi-Criterion Analysis , 2017 .

[62]  Louis Y.Y. Lu,et al.  Environmental principles applicable to green supplier evaluation by using multi-objective decision analysis , 2007 .

[63]  Ana Maria Esteves,et al.  Mining and social development: Refocusing community investment using multi-criteria decision analysis , 2008 .

[64]  P. Bilotta,et al.  Decision support method for GHG emission management in industries , 2018, International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology.

[65]  Fabio De Felice,et al.  Investing in socially responsible mutual funds: Proposal of non-financial ranking in Italian market , 2016 .