Attention to Counter-Attitudinal Messages in a State Election Campaign

Research following the "selective exposure" model has focused on avoidance of political messages with which a person might disagree. But positive attention to such "counter-attitudinal" messages is worthy of study, in part because normative theories of democracy value exposure to information that might disturb citizens' political predispositions. Surveys of youth (N = 417) and parents (N = 430) examine attention to newspaper, television, and Web messages about candidates. While there is somewhat more attention to messages about and for a person's favored political candidate or party, forms of political involvement (knowledge, curiosity, and discussion) that predict this "attitude-consistent" attention also predict counter-attitudinal attention at least as strongly. Parents' education and students' exposure to civics lessons also predict both kinds of attention. These results suggest that attention to counterattitudinal political messages is worthy of further study as an important goal of political sociali...

[1]  Steven H. Chaffee,et al.  Learning about Politics from the Mass Media , 1997 .

[2]  Norman H. Nie,et al.  The Changing American Voter. , 1976 .

[3]  E. Katz.  Platforms & Windows: Broadcasting's Role in Election Campaigns , 1971 .

[4]  Stanley J. Baran,et al.  Mass Communication Theory: Foundations, Ferment and Future , 1994 .

[5]  David Gottlieb,et al.  The Political Character of Adolescence: The Influence of Families and Schools. , 1975 .

[6]  Dieter Frey,et al.  Recent Research on Selective Exposure to Information , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

[7]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  A History of Communication Study: A Biographical Approach , 1994 .

[8]  Hernan Galperin,et al.  EDUCATION FOR DEMOCRACY IN ARGENTINA: EFFECTS OF A NEWSPAPER-IN-SCHOOL PROGRAM , 1997 .

[9]  J. Freedman,et al.  SELECTIVE EXPOSURE TO INFORMATION: A CRITICAL REVIEW , 1967 .

[10]  S. Chaffee,et al.  Measurement and Effects of Attention to Media News , 1986 .

[11]  H. Lasswell,et al.  Propaganda and Promotional Activities: An Annotated Bibliography , 1935 .

[12]  J. Searle.  The Construction of Social Reality , 1997 .

[13]  Melvin L. DeFleur,et al.  Understanding Mass Communication , 1981 .

[14]  Propaganda, Communication, and Public Opinion: A Comprehensive Reference Guide. , 1946 .

[15]  T. Cook.  Governing with the News: The News Media as a Political Institution , 1998 .

[16]  Richard G. Niemi,et al.  Civic Education: What Makes Students Learn , 1998 .

[17]  R. Zajonc.  Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. , 1968 .

[18]  M. Defleur,et al.  Theories of mass communication , 1968 .

[19]  Richard F. Carter.  Communication and Affective Relations , 1965 .

[20]  Joseph T. Klapper,et al.  The effects of mass communication , 1960 .

[21]  D. Shaw,et al.  Agenda setting function of mass media , 1972 .

[22]  Alexis S. Tan.  Mass communication theories and research , 1985 .

[23]  Closing Gaps in Political Knowledge: Effects of a School Intervention via Communication in the Home. , 2000 .

[24]  R. E. Dawson,et al.  Political Socialization: An Analytic Study , 1977 .

[25]  谷藤 悦史,et al.  Theories of Mass Communication,5th edition/Melvin L.Defleur,Sandora Ball-Rokeach(1989) , 1992 .

[26]  Steven H. Chaffee,et al.  Measuring New-Voter Learning Via Three Channels of Political Information , 1995 .

[27]  S. Kraus,et al.  The effects of mass communication on political behavior , 1976 .

[28]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign , 1954 .

[29]  S. Chaffee,et al.  SELECTIVE EXPOSURE AND THE REINFORCEMENT HYPOTHESIS , 1983 .

[30]  Michael McDevitt,et al.  Closing Gaps in Political Communication and Knowledge , 2000, Commun. Res..

[31]  PREADULT LEARNING OF POLITICAL INDEPENDENCE , 1986 .

[32]  M. Jahoda,et al.  The evasion of propaganda; how prejudiced people respond to anti-prejudice propaganda. , 1947, The Journal of psychology.

[33]  S. Chaffee.  Salience and pertinence as sources of value change. , 1967, The Journal of communication.

[34]  J Mills,et al.  Avoidance of dissonant information. , 1965, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[35]  John L. Cotton,et al.  Selective exposure to information and cognitive dissonance , 1980 .

[36]  Dean A. Ziemke.  Selective Exposure in a Presidential Campaign Contingent on Certainty and Salience , 1980 .

[37]  P. Golding.  The mass media , 1974 .

[38]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[39]  W. Bennett.  News, the politics of illusion , 1983 .

[40]  Leo W. Jeffres,et al.  Mass media: Processes and effects , 1986 .

[41]  R. Rhine.  Some problems in dissonance theory research on information selectivity. , 1967, Psychological bulletin.

[42]  Elizabeth M. Perse,et al.  Implications of cognitive and affective involvement for channel changing , 1998 .

[43]  Werner J. Severin,et al.  Communication Theories: Origins, Methods and Uses in the Mass Media , 1991 .

[44]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  The People's Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign , 1968 .

[45]  Steven H. Chaffee,et al.  Time of Decision and Media Use During the Ford-Carter Campaign , 1980 .

[46]  Jack M. McLeod,et al.  Individual vs. Social Predictors of Information Seeking , 1973 .

[47]  J. Brigham,et al.  Selective Evaluation and Recall During the 1980 Reagan‐Carter Debate1 , 1983 .

[48]  W. Davison,et al.  Mass Media: Systems and Effects , 1977 .

[49]  J. Zaller,et al.  WHO GETS THE NEWS? ALTERNATIVE MEASURES OF NEWS RECEPTION AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH , 1993 .