Spatial Situation Models and Text Comprehension.

Three experiments examined how readers inferred spatial information that was relevant to a story character's movements through a previously memorized layout of a fictional building relative to various tasks. This study also examined how inference measures were related to spatial imagery and reading comprehension ability. Replicating the spatial separation effect reported by Morrow, Greenspan, and Bower (1987), probed objects were responded to faster when they were located in the same room of a building as the main character of a narrative than when the objects were located in different rooms. Experiment 2 ruled out a simple name-based priming explanation of the spatial separation effect, and Experiment 3 demonstrated a facilitation for objects from the character's target room even when readers were provided with a spatially indeterminate list description of the building. The construction-integration model of text comprehension accounted for the spatial separation effect in terms of variations in the knowledge-integration process. It was concluded that the integration of an enriched knowledge network can facilitate the process of mapping text information onto a developing mental representation of a discourse situation, a process that gains further support from spatial imagery and reading comprehension ability.

[1]  Morton Ann Gernsbacher,et al.  Language Comprehension As Structure Building , 1990 .

[2]  Wolfgang Schneider,et al.  Expert Knowledge, General Abilities, and Text Processing , 1990 .

[3]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Failures to Detect Contradictions in a Text: What Readers Believe versus what they Read , 1992 .

[4]  A. Glenberg,et al.  Mental models contribute to foregrounding during text comprehension , 1987 .

[5]  P. Carpenter,et al.  Individual differences in working memory and reading , 1980 .

[6]  5 Individual Differences in Situation-based lnferencing * during Narrative Text Comprehension , 2012 .

[7]  James F. Voss,et al.  Text Processing of Domain-Related Information for Individuals with High and Low Domain Knowledge: Methodological Considerations. , 1979 .

[8]  D. Reutzel,et al.  EFFECTS OF PRIOR KNOWLEDGE, EXPLICITNESS, AND CLAUSE ORDER ON CHILDREN'S COMPREHENSION OF CAUSAL RELATIONSHIPS , 1990 .

[9]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  Processing Components of College-Level Reading Comprehension. , 1994 .

[10]  Steven E. Poltrock,et al.  Individual Differences in visual imagery and spatial ability , 1984 .

[11]  S. Greenspan,et al.  Accessibility and situation models in narrative comprehension , 1987 .

[12]  M. Gernsbacher,et al.  Investigating differences in general comprehension skill. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  W. Kintsch,et al.  The construction-integration model: A framework for studying memory for text. , 1991 .

[14]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Inference during reading. , 1992 .

[15]  W. Kintsch.  The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model. , 1988, Psychological review.

[16]  Keith E. Stanovich,et al.  Cognitive variation in adult college students differing in reading ability. , 1990 .

[17]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  A cognitive architecture for comprehension. , 1992 .

[18]  G. Bower,et al.  Mental Models and Narrative Comprehension: Some Qualifications , 1993 .

[19]  Herre van Oostendorp,et al.  Do readers construct spatial representations in naturalistic story comprehension , 1993 .

[20]  S. Greenspan,et al.  Updating situation models during narrative comprehension , 1989 .

[21]  Frank R. Yekovich,et al.  The Influence of Domain Knowledge on Inferencing In Low-Aptitude Individuals , 1990 .

[22]  Jason E. Albrecht,et al.  Comprehension strategies in the development of a mental model. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[23]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  Individual differences in reprocessing of text. , 1992 .

[24]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Inference during reading. , 1992, Psychological review.

[25]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Individual differences in mental imagery ability: A computational analysis , 1984, Cognition.

[26]  Ruth B. Ekstrom,et al.  MANUAL FOR KIT OF REFERENCE TESTS FOR COGNITIVE FACTORS (REVISED 1963) , 1963 .