Global Cities and Developmental States: New York, Tokyo and Seoul

The 'world city paradigm' assumes a convergence in economic base, spatial organisation and social structure among the world's major cities. However, Tokyo, capital of the world's second-largest national economy and the world's largest urban agglomeration, departs from the world city model on most salient dimensions. Seoul, centre of east Asia's second OECD member and the region's second-largest metropolis, exhibits the same anomaly. Tokyo and Seoul's departure from the world city hypothesis stem from late industrialisation and especially the relationship between industrial policy and finance institutionalised in a developmental state. Understanding Tokyo and Seoul necessitates a different conception of the world system from the globalist version of the world city argument. World cities differ from one another in many salient respects because they are lodged within a non-hegemonic and interdependent world political economy divided among differently organised national systems and regional alliances.

[1]  E. Vogel,et al.  Ideology and National Competitiveness: An Analysis of Nine Countries , 1987 .

[2]  Young Sun Lee.  A political economy analysis of the Korean economic crisis , 1998 .

[3]  Yoonje Cho.  Government Intervention, Rent Distribution, and Economic Development in Korea , 1998 .

[4]  P. Taylor.  World cities in a world-system: World cities and territorial states: the rise and fall of their mutuality , 1995 .

[5]  John Friedmann,et al.  World city formation: an agenda for research and action , 1982 .

[6]  Kuniko Fujita,et al.  Osaka's Tokyo Problem* , 1995 .

[7]  T. Machimura.  The Urban Restructuring Process in Tokyo in the 1980s: Transforming Tokyo into a World City , 1992 .

[8]  Russell Mardon.  The State and The Effective Control of Foreign Capital: The Case of South Korea , 1990, World Politics.

[9]  W. M. Fruin.  The Japanese Enterprise System , 1994 .

[10]  S. Sassen.  World cities in a world-system: On concentration and centrality in the global city , 1995 .

[11]  Saskia Sassen,et al.  Global Financial Centers , 1999 .

[12]  J. Friedmann,et al.  World cities in a world-system: Where we stand: a decade of world city research , 1995 .

[13]  S. Sassen-koob,et al.  New York City: Economic Restructuring and Immigration , 1986 .

[14]  J. Friedmann.  The World City Hypothesis , 1986 .

[15]  C. J. Eckert.  The South Korean Bourgeoisie: A Class in Search of Hegemony , 2011 .

[16]  Kuniko Fujita,et al.  State Restructuring and Local Power in Japan , 2000 .

[17]  Kuniko Fujita,et al.  Industrial Districts and Economic Development in Japan: The Case of Tokyo and Osaka , 1998 .

[18]  S. Hymer.  THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION AND THE LAW OF UNEVEN DEVELOPMENT , 1982 .

[19]  N. Thrift,et al.  Neo‐Marshallian Nodes in Global Networks* , 1992 .