Within-Subject Research Designs for Dance Medicine and Science

Dance medicine and science is an applied research endeavor with a particular interest in attempting to effect clinically significant improvements in the performance of exceptional individuals. Unfortunately, the group comparison research designs currently popular with dance medicine and science researchers do not meet all of the needs of an applied science. We would like to propose within-subject research designs as useful alternatives for researching questions important to dance medicine. Within-subject designs have variously been called single-subject designs, singlecase designs, individual subject designs, ideographic studies, and small N studies. We have selected the term within-subject to draw attention to the major defining characteristic of these designs — each subject’s performance is compared with his or her own performance under varying experimental conditions. We will describe three basic withinsubject designs, their advantages, and their limitations. We will also explain several misconceptions about withinsubject designs and then conclude with several suggestions for how researchers might use within-subject designs to achieve sensitive and convincing analyses of phenomena important to dance medicine and science.

[1]  G. Martin,et al.  Applied research studies with single-subject designs: Why so few? , 1996 .

[2]  D M Reboussin,et al.  Statistical considerations in the use and analysis of single-subject designs. , 1996, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[3]  B T Bates,et al.  The effect of trial size on statistical power. , 1992, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[4]  Ronald E. Smith,et al.  The Logic and Design of Case Study Research , 1988 .

[5]  Bruce A. Thyer,et al.  Single-case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change (2nd edn): by David H. Barlow and Michel Hersen Pergamon Press, New York, 1984, 419 pp. , 1985 .

[6]  T. Ayllon,et al.  Behavioral Coaching in Classical Ballet , 1983 .

[7]  D M Baer,et al.  "Perhaps it would be better not to know everything.". , 1977, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[8]  J Michael,et al.  Statistical inference for individual organism research: mixed blessing or curse? , 1974, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[9]  G. Keppel Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook, 3rd ed. , 1991 .

[10]  Alan Poling,et al.  Research methods in applied behavior analysis : issues and advances , 1986 .

[11]  Donald M. Baer,et al.  The Graphic Analysis of Data , 1986 .

[12]  B. Huitema Statistical Analysis and Single-Subject Designs , 1986 .

[13]  T. Cook,et al.  Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings , 1979 .

[14]  D. Barlow,et al.  Single Case Experimental Designs: Strategies for Studying Behavior Change , 1976 .

[15]  L. K. Miller,et al.  Principles of Everyday Behavior Analysis , 1975 .

[16]  M. Sidman Tactics of Scientific Research , 1960 .