A comparison of sequence and structure protein domain families as a basis for structural genomics

MOTIVATION Protein families can be defined based on structure or sequence similarity. We wanted to compare two protein family databases, one based on structural and one on sequence similarity, to investigate to what extent they overlap, the similarity in definition of corresponding families, and to create a list of large protein families with unknown structure as a resource for structural genomics. We also wanted to increase the sensitivity of fold assignment by exploiting protein family HMMs. RESULTS We compared Pfam, a protein family database based on sequence similarity, to Scop, which is based on structural similarity. We found that 70% of the Scop families exist in Pfam while 57% of the Pfam families exist in Scop. Most families that occur in both databases correspond well to each other, but in some cases they are different. Such cases highlight situations in which structure and sequence approaches differ significantly. The comparison enabled us to compile a list of the largest families that do not occur in Scop; these are suitable targets for structure prediction and determination, and may be useful to guide projects in structural genomics. It can be noted that 13 out of the 20 largest protein families without a known structure are likely transmembrane proteins. We also exploited Pfam to increase the sensitivity of detecting homologs of proteins with known structure, by comparing query sequences to Pfam HMMs that correspond to Scop families. For SWISSPROT+TREMBL, this yielded an increase in fold assignment from 31% to 42% compared to using FASTA only. This method assigned a structure to 22% of the proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, 24% in Escherichia coli, and 16% in Methanococcus jannaschii.

[1]  Rolf Apweiler,et al.  The SWISS-PROT protein sequence data bank and its new supplement TREMBL , 1996, Nucleic Acids Res..

[2]  Robert D. Finn,et al.  Pfam 3.1: 1313 multiple alignments and profile HMMs match the majority of proteins , 1999, Nucleic Acids Res..

[3]  C Sander,et al.  Bioinformatics and the discovery of gene function. , 1996, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[4]  Sean R. Eddy,et al.  Pfam: multiple sequence alignments and HMM-profiles of protein domains , 1998, Nucleic Acids Res..

[5]  David C. Jones,et al.  CATH--a hierarchic classification of protein domain structures. , 1997, Structure.

[6]  Eva Nogales,et al.  New insights into microtubule structure and function from the atomic model of tubulin , 1998, European Biophysics Journal.

[7]  A G Murzin,et al.  SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  W. Kabsch,et al.  Similarity of the three-dimensional structures of actin and the ATPase fragment of a 70-kDa heat shock cognate protein. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  J. Craig Venter,et al.  The first genome from the third domain of life , 1997, Nature.

[10]  R. Durbin,et al.  Pfam: A comprehensive database of protein domain families based on seed alignments , 1997, Proteins.

[11]  H. Mewes,et al.  Protein structural classes in five complete genomes , 1997, Nature Structural Biology.

[12]  W. C. Barker,et al.  The PIR-International Protein Sequence Database. , 1998, Nucleic acids research.

[13]  Erik L. L. Sonnhammer,et al.  A Hidden Markov Model for Predicting Transmembrane Helices in Protein Sequences , 1998, ISMB.

[14]  Harold A. Scheraga,et al.  Calculation of the Structures of Collagen Models. Role of Interchain Interactions in Determining the Triple-Helical Coiled-Coil Conformation. 2. Poly(glycyl-prolyl-hydroxyprolyl) , 1980 .

[15]  P. Bork,et al.  Metabolism and evolution of Haemophilus influenzae deduced from a whole-genome comparison with Escherichia coli , 1996, Current Biology.

[16]  Cathy H. Wu,et al.  Motif identification neural design for rapid and sensitive protein family search , 1996, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[17]  C. Chothia,et al.  Gene duplications in H. influenzae , 1995, Nature.

[18]  G J Williams,et al.  The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. , 1978, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[19]  N Linial,et al.  Global self-organization of all known protein sequences reveals inherent biological signatures. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[20]  R. Fleischmann,et al.  Complete Genome Sequence of the Methanogenic Archaeon, Methanococcus jannaschii , 1996, Science.

[21]  C Sander,et al.  Mapping the Protein Universe , 1996, Science.

[22]  John C. Wootton,et al.  Non-globular Domains in Protein Sequences: Automated Segmentation Using Complexity Measures , 1994, Comput. Chem..

[23]  Chris Sander,et al.  Dali/FSSP classification of three-dimensional protein folds , 1997, Nucleic Acids Res..

[24]  N. W. Davis,et al.  The complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli K-12. , 1997, Science.

[25]  E. Sonnhammer,et al.  Modular arrangement of proteins as inferred from analysis of homology , 1994, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.