Current status of robotics in urologic laparoscopy.

Urology has continuously embraced novel technologies like laparoscopy that reduce patient morbidity yet maintain an excellent standard of care. Because of limitations on maneuverability, operative vision, manual dexterity, and tactile sense, laparoscopy can be more difficult to perform than corresponding tasks in open surgery. To potentially increase clinical applicability of laparoscopy, robots that enhance operative performance have recently been introduced for a variety of laparoscopic procedures such as laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, pyeloplasty, and even laparoscopic cystectomy and neobladder construction. While these robots have generated excitement and many robotic applications have been described, the benefit of the advanced technology in expanded series of patients remains largely unknown. In addition, the ability of telerobotics to be used by surgeons inexperienced in conventional laparoscopy is also poorly understood. This review compares current features of available robots, advantages and limitations of robots, the emerging clinical applications, and the future potential of robotics in urology.

[1]  Georg Bartsch,et al.  Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty performed using the da Vinci robotic system. , 2002, Urology.

[2]  Ashutosh Tewari,et al.  Prospective comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted anatomic prostatectomy: the Vattikuti Urology Institute experience. , 2002, Urology.

[3]  Makoto Hashizume,et al.  A new era of robotic surgery assisted by a computer-enhanced surgical system. , 2002, Surgery.

[4]  A W Partin,et al.  Complete robot-assisted laparoscopic urologic surgery: a preliminary report. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[5]  S. Horgan,et al.  Early experience with robotically assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. , 2002 .

[6]  James A. Young,et al.  Robotic-assisted adrenalectomy for adrenal incidentaloma: case and review of the technique. , 2002, Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques.

[7]  Jacques Marescaux,et al.  Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery , 2001, Nature.

[8]  B Stanberry,et al.  Telemedicine: barriers and opportunities in the 21st century , 2000, Journal of internal medicine.

[9]  Ashutosh Tewari,et al.  Laparoscopic and robot assisted radical prostatectomy: establishment of a structured program and preliminary analysis of outcomes. , 2002, The Journal of urology.

[10]  Guy Vallancien,et al.  Robotically Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Feasibility Study in Men , 2001, European Urology.

[11]  J. Binder,et al.  Laparoscopic transperitoneal adrenalectomy using a remote-controlled robotic surgical system. , 2002, Journal of endourology.

[12]  Robotic cardiac valve surgery: transcending the technologic crevasse! , 2001, Current opinion in cardiology.

[13]  G. Sung,et al.  Robotic remote laparoscopic nephrectomy and adrenalectomy: the initial experience. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[14]  J C Bowersox,et al.  Remote operative urology using a surgical telemanipulator system: preliminary observations. , 1998, Urology.

[15]  Jens Rassweiler,et al.  Robotic and telesurgery: will they change our future? , 2001, Current opinion in urology.

[16]  R McCloy,et al.  Virtual reality in surgery , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[17]  A W Partin,et al.  Comparison of robotic versus human laparoscopic camera control . , 1995, The Journal of urology.

[18]  G Bartsch,et al.  Transcontinental interactive laparoscopic telesurgery between the United States and Europe. , 1998, The Journal of urology.

[19]  G. Bartsch,et al.  Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: comparison of procedures performed with the davinci robotic system versus standard techniques , 2002 .

[20]  G. Sung,et al.  Robotic laparoscopic surgery: a comparison of the DA Vinci and Zeus systems. , 2001, Urology.

[21]  Adrian Lobontiu,et al.  Robotic assisted kidney transplantation: an initial experience. , 2002, The Journal of urology.

[22]  Georg Bartsch,et al.  A comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty performed with the daVinci robotic system versus standard laparoscopic techniques: initial clinical results. , 2002, European urology.

[23]  G. Sung,et al.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a pilot study. , 1999, Urology.

[24]  H Handels,et al.  Simulation of Hip Operations and Design of Custom-made Endoprostheses using Virtual Reality Techniques , 2001, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[25]  J. Binder,et al.  Robotically‐assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy , 2001, BJU international.

[26]  G Vallancien,et al.  Robot assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy. , 2001, The Journal of urology.

[27]  A. Darzi,et al.  Recent advances in minimal access surgery , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[28]  Robert G. Moore,et al.  Telerobotic assisted laparoscopicsurgery: Initial laboratory and clinical experience* , 1994 .

[29]  Christian Stock,et al.  Telesurgical Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy , 2001, European Urology.

[30]  G Vallancien,et al.  Robotic assisted, laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection in humans. , 2001, The Journal of urology.

[31]  D. Stoianovici,et al.  Robotics in urologic surgery. , 1997, Urology.

[32]  G. Buess,et al.  Robotics and telemanipulation technologies for endoscopic surgery , 2000, Surgical Endoscopy.

[33]  J A Cadeddu,et al.  Robotic surgery in urology. , 1998, The Urologic clinics of North America.