An update on DOE's Phase II and Phase III mercury control technology R&D program

The U.S. Department of Energy's National Energy Technology Laboratory, under the Office of Fossil Energy's Innovations for Existing Plants Program, carried out a comprehensive Hg research and development program for coal-fired power generation facilities since the mid-1990s. Working collaboratively with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the Electric Power Research Institute, power plant operators, state and local agencies, and a host of research organizations and academic institutions, the Program identified the major factors that affect mercury speciation and capture in coal combustion flue gas and funneled this knowledge into the development of a suite of mercury control technologies for the diverse fleet of U.S. coal-fired power plants. The high performance observed during full-scale field testing has given coal-fired power plant operators the confidence to begin deploying technology. As of March 2009, more than 130 full-scale activated carbon injection systems have been ordered by the U.S. coal-fired power generators. These contracts include both new and retrofit installations and represent over 55 GW of coal-based electric generating capacity.

[1]  Steven A. Benson,et al.  Large-Scale Mercury Control Technology Testing for Lignite-Fired Utilities - Oxidation Systems for Wet FGD , 2004 .

[2]  Paul Johnson,et al.  TOXECON clean coal demonstration for mercury and multi-pollutant control at the Presque Isle Power Plant , 2009 .

[3]  A. Presto,et al.  Further Investigation of the Impact of Sulfur Oxides on Mercury Capture by Activated Carbon , 2007 .

[4]  Ravi K Srivastava,et al.  Control of mercury emissions from coal-fired electric utility boilers. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  Michael D. Durham FIELD TEST PROGRAM TO DEVELOP COMPREHENSIVE DESIGN, OPERATING, AND COST DATA FOR MERCURY CONTROL SYSTEMS , 2004 .

[6]  Barry R. Stewart,et al.  Coal Combustion Product (CCP) Production and Use , 1999 .

[7]  S. Sjostrom Evaluation of Sorbent Injection for Mercury Control , 2005 .

[8]  J. Bustard,et al.  Full-scale evaluation of carbon injection for mercury control at a unit firing high sulfur coal , 2006 .

[9]  Andrew P. Jones,et al.  An Update on DOE/NETL's Mercury Control Technology Field Testing Program , 2008 .

[10]  Sharon Sjostrom,et al.  Low-Cost Options for Moderate Levels of Mercury Control , 2007 .

[11]  Andrew P. Jones,et al.  DOE/NETL's phase II mercury control technology field testing program: preliminary economic analysis of activated carbon injection. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  R. Landreth Brominated Sorbents for Small Cold-Side ESPs, Hot-Side ESPs and Fly Ash Use in Concrete , 2001 .