Validation of cytogenetic risk groups according to International Prognostic Scoring Systems by peripheral blood CD34+FISH: results from a German diagnostic study in comparison with an international control group

International Prognostic Scoring Systems are used to determine the individual risk profile of myelodysplastic syndrome patients. For the assessment of International Prognostic Scoring Systems, an adequate chromosome banding analysis of the bone marrow is essential. Cytogenetic information is not available for a substantial number of patients (5%–20%) with dry marrow or an insufficient number of metaphase cells. For these patients, a valid risk classification is impossible. In the study presented here, the International Prognostic Scoring Systems were validated based on fluorescence in situ hybridization analyses using extended probe panels applied to cluster of differentiation 34 positive (CD34+) peripheral blood cells of 328 MDS patients of our prospective multicenter German diagnostic study and compared to chromosome banding results of 2902 previously published patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. For cytogenetic risk classification by fluorescence in situ hybridization analyses of CD34+ peripheral blood cells, the groups differed significantly for overall and leukemia-free survival by uni- and multivariate analyses without discrepancies between treated and untreated patients. Including cytogenetic data of fluorescence in situ hybridization analyses of peripheral CD34+ blood cells (instead of bone marrow banding analysis) into the complete International Prognostic Scoring System assessment, the prognostic risk groups separated significantly for overall and leukemia-free survival. Our data show that a reliable stratification to the risk groups of the International Prognostic Scoring Systems is possible from peripheral blood in patients with missing chromosome banding analysis by using a comprehensive probe panel (clinicaltrials.gov identifier:01355913).

[1]  R. Schlenk,et al.  Validation of the revised international prognostic scoring system (IPSS-R) in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome: a multicenter study. , 2014, Leukemia research.

[2]  R. Schlenk,et al.  Molecular cytogenetic monitoring from CD34+ peripheral blood cells in myelodysplastic syndromes: first results from a prospective multicenter German diagnostic study. , 2013, Leukemia research.

[3]  A. Mishra,et al.  Validation of the revised International Prognostic Scoring System in treated patients with myelodysplastic syndromes , 2013, American journal of hematology.

[4]  M. Cazzola,et al.  P-113 Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) for primary treated myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) patients: A report from the IWG-PM , 2013 .

[5]  M. Breccia,et al.  Revised IPSS (IPSS-R) stratification and outcome of MDS patients treated with azacitidine , 2013, Annals of Hematology.

[6]  Luca Malcovati,et al.  Revised international prognostic scoring system for myelodysplastic syndromes. , 2012, Blood.

[7]  F. Solé,et al.  Will a peripheral blood (PB) sample yield the same diagnostic and prognostic cytogenetic data as the concomitant bone marrow (BM) in myelodysplasia? , 2012, Leukemia research.

[8]  Hui Jiang,et al.  The utility of fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis in diagnosing myelodysplastic syndromes is limited to cases with karyotype failure. , 2012, Leukemia research.

[9]  C. Steidl,et al.  New comprehensive cytogenetic scoring system for primary myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and oligoblastic acute myeloid leukemia after MDS derived from an international database merge. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  R. Tubbs,et al.  Diagnostic yield of bone marrow and peripheral blood FISH panel testing in clinically suspected myelodysplastic syndromes and/or acute myeloid leukemia: a prospective analysis of 433 cases. , 2011, American journal of clinical pathology.

[11]  E. Estey,et al.  Coalesced multicentric analysis of 2,351 patients with myelodysplastic syndromes indicates an underestimation of poor-risk cytogenetics of myelodysplastic syndromes in the international prognostic scoring system. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  E. Campo,et al.  Do we need to do fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis in myelodysplastic syndromes as often as we do? , 2010, Leukemia research.

[13]  L. Trümper,et al.  FISH analysis of circulating CD34+ cells as a new tool for genetic monitoring in MDS: verification of the method and application to 27 MDS patients. , 2010, Leukemia research.

[14]  G. Bhagat,et al.  FISH analysis in addition to G-band karyotyping: utility in evaluation of myelodysplastic syndromes? , 2010, Leukemia research.

[15]  R. Pinheiro,et al.  Comparison of I-FISH and G-banding for the detection of chromosomal abnormalities during the evolution of myelodysplastic syndrome. , 2009, Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologicas.

[16]  Valeria Santini,et al.  Efficacy of azacitidine compared with that of conventional care regimens in the treatment of higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: a randomised, open-label, phase III study. , 2009, The Lancet. Oncology.

[17]  Thomas H Müller,et al.  New insights into the prognostic impact of the karyotype in MDS and correlation with subtypes: evidence from a core dataset of 2124 patients. , 2007, Blood.

[18]  T. Haferlach,et al.  Definitions and standards in the diagnosis and treatment of the myelodysplastic syndromes: Consensus statements and report from a working conference. , 2007, Leukemia research.

[19]  Jean McGowan-Jordan,et al.  ISCN 2013 : an international system for human cytogenetic nomenclature (2013) : recommendations of the International Standing Committee on Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature , 2005 .

[20]  L. Rimsza,et al.  Efficacy of lenalidomide in myelodysplastic syndromes. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  P. Fenaux Myelodysplastic syndromes: From pathogenesis and prognosis to treatment. , 2004, Seminars in hematology.

[22]  M. Silva,et al.  Comparison of cytogenetics with FISH in 40 myelodysplastic syndrome patients. , 2002, Leukemia research.

[23]  A. Cuneo,et al.  Clinical importance of interphase cytogenetics detecting occult chromosome lesions in myelodysplastic syndromes with normal karyotype , 2001, Leukemia.

[24]  C. Bloomfield,et al.  The World Health Organization classification of neoplasms of the hematopoietic and lymphoid tissues: report of the Clinical Advisory Committee meeting--Airlie House, Virginia, November, 1997. , 2000, The hematology journal : the official journal of the European Haematology Association.

[25]  G Flandrin,et al.  The World Health Organization classification of neoplastic diseases of the hematopoietic and lymphoid tissues. Report of the Clinical Advisory Committee meeting, Airlie House, Virginia, November, 1997. , 1999, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[26]  T Hamblin,et al.  International scoring system for evaluating prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes. , 1997, Blood.

[27]  Iscn International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature , 1978 .