An Analysis of the Predictive Validity of the New Ecological Paradigm Scale

Abstract The widely used New Environmental Paradigm (NEP) scale was recently revised to address concerns about its dimensionality and validity. As an ever larger number of researchers from an increasing variety of disciplines incorporate environmental issues into their research, the need for environmental concern measures such as the NEP will broaden. The authors evaluated the predictive validity of the original and revised versions of the NEP scale, some abbreviated NEP-derived scales, and a non-NEP environmental attitudes scale. All of these scales explained a significant amount of the variance in a measure of intention to engage in proenvi-ronmental behavior. Based on the results, the authors suggest how researchers should use these scales in their research.

[1]  R. Dunlap,et al.  The “New Environmental Paradigm” , 1978 .

[2]  John Hunsley,et al.  Toward a Model of Environmental Activism , 1998 .

[3]  James A. Roberts,et al.  Exploring the Subtle Relationships between Environmental Concern and Ecologically Conscious Consumer Behavior , 1997 .

[4]  R. Dunlap,et al.  THE NEW ENVIRONMENTAL PARADIGM: 5 PROPOSED MEASURING INSTRUMENT AND PRELIMINARY RESULTS , 1978 .

[5]  R. Dunlap,et al.  Environmental Sociology , 2002 .

[6]  P. Stern,et al.  Value Orientations, Gender, and Environmental Concern , 1993 .

[7]  Richard W. Stackman,et al.  Business-Environment Attitudes and the New Environmental Paradigm , 1991 .

[8]  Joanne Vining,et al.  Predicting Recycling Behavior from Global and Specific Environmental Attitudes and Changes in Recycling Opportunities1 , 1992 .

[9]  Joanne Vining,et al.  Reducing Solid Waste , 1999 .

[10]  Andrzej Furman,et al.  A Note on Environmental Concern in a Developing Country , 1998 .

[11]  Thomas A. Arcury,et al.  Environmental Attitude and Environmental Knowledge , 1990 .

[12]  Stuart Oskamp,et al.  Psychology of Promoting Environmentalism: Psychological Contributions toAchieving an Ecologically Sustainable Future for Humanity , 2000 .

[13]  T. Gärling,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN: CONCEPTUAL DEFINITIONS, MEASUREMENT METHODS, AND RESEARCH FINDINGS , 1999 .

[14]  Jack M. Geller,et al.  The New Environmental Paradigm Scale: A Reexamination , 1985 .

[15]  Tim G. Acott,et al.  A Modified NEP/DSP Environmental Attitudes Scale , 2000 .

[16]  P. Stern,et al.  The New Ecological Paradigm in Social-Psychological Context , 1995 .

[17]  R. Dunlap,et al.  Environmental Concern , 1981 .

[18]  T. Arcury,et al.  Environmental Worldview in Response to Environmental Problems , 1990 .

[19]  Geoffrey Gooch,et al.  Environmental Beliefs and Attitudes in Sweden and the Baltic States , 1995 .

[20]  D. Nowell,et al.  The new environmental paradigm scale: Wildlife and environmental beliefs in British Columbia , 1989 .

[21]  Örjan Wiidegren,et al.  The New Environmental Paradigm and Personal Norms , 1998 .

[22]  R. Dunlap,et al.  Measuring Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A Revised NEP Scale , 2000 .

[23]  Fern K. Willits,et al.  Environmental Attitudes and Behavior , 1994 .

[24]  Gunnar Grendstad,et al.  Correlates of Environmental Behaviors , 2001 .

[25]  C. Gan,et al.  Evaluating Nature-based Tourism Using the New Environmental Paradigm , 1995, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.

[26]  F. Kaiser,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL ATTITUDE AND ECOLOGICAL BEHAVIOUR , 1999 .

[27]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  Values, Beliefs, and Proenvironmental Action: Attitude Formation Toward Emergent Attitude Objects1 , 1995 .

[28]  R. Dunlap,et al.  Polls, Pollution, and Politics Revisited Public Opinion on the Environment in the Reagan Era , 1987 .