The Effect of Cognitive-Task Type and Walking Speed on Dual-Task Gait in Healthy Adults.

In a number of studies in which a dual-task gait paradigm was used, researchers reported a relationship between cognitive function and gait. However, it is not clear to what extent these effects are dependent on the type of cognitive and walking tasks used in the dual-task paradigm. This study examined whether stride-time variability (STV) and trunk range of motion (RoM) are affected by the type of cognitive task and walking speed used during dual-task gait. Participants walked at both their preferred walking speed and at 25% of their preferred walking speed and performed a serial subtraction and a working memory task at both speeds. Although both tasks significantly reduced STV at both walking speeds, there was no difference between the two tasks. Trunk RoM was affected by the walking speed and type of cognitive task used during dual-task gait: Mediolateral trunk RoM was increased at the slow walking speed, and anterior-posterior trunk RoM was higher only when performing the serial subtraction task at the slow walking speed. The reduction of STV, regardless of cognitive-task type, suggests that healthy adults may redirect cognitive processes away from gait toward cognitive-task performance during dual-task gait.

[1]  L. Brown,et al.  Age-dependent differences in the attentional demands of obstacle negotiation. , 2005, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[2]  Kathryn M. McMillan,et al.  N‐back working memory paradigm: A meta‐analysis of normative functional neuroimaging studies , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[3]  Takehiko Doi,et al.  Dual-task costs for whole trunk movement during gait. , 2011, Gait & posture.

[4]  David Simoni,et al.  Different motor tasks impact differently on cognitive performance of older persons during dual task tests. , 2013, Clinical biomechanics.

[5]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  The role of executive function and attention in gait , 2008, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[6]  Justin J Kavanagh,et al.  Lower trunk motion and speed-dependence during walking , 2009, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[7]  G Ratcliff,et al.  Serial Sevens Versus World Backwards: A Comparison of the Two Measures of Attention From the MMSE , 1990, Journal of geriatric psychiatry and neurology.

[8]  Andrew M. Johnson,et al.  Dual task performance in a healthy young adult population: results from a symmetric manipulation of task complexity and articulation. , 2009, Gait & posture.

[9]  E. Heath Borg's Perceived Exertion and Pain Scales , 1998 .

[10]  U. Croce,et al.  A kinematic and kinetic comparison of overground and treadmill walking in healthy subjects. , 2007, Gait & posture.

[11]  Subhobrata Mitra,et al.  Methodological and interpretive issues in posture-cognition dual-tasking in upright stance. , 2008, Gait & posture.

[12]  Valerie E. Kelly,et al.  Effects of instructed focus and task difficulty on concurrent walking and cognitive task performance in healthy young adults , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Dual‐tasking effects on gait variability: The role of aging, falls, and executive function , 2006, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[14]  A. Pohlmeyer,et al.  Walking variability and working-memory load in aging: a dual-process account relating cognitive control to motor control performance. , 2008, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[15]  Shu-Chen Li,et al.  Dual-tasking postural control: Aging and the effects of cognitive demand in conjunction with focus of attention , 2006, Brain Research Bulletin.

[16]  Takehiko Doi,et al.  Dual tasking affects lateral trunk control in healthy younger and older adults. , 2013, Gait & posture.

[17]  David A. Winter,et al.  Human balance and posture control during standing and walking , 1995 .

[18]  Michael Voigt,et al.  Residual attentional capacity amongst young and elderly during dual and triple task walking. , 2008, Human movement science.

[19]  Barbara L. Shay,et al.  The interacting effect of cognitive and motor task demands on performance of gait, balance and cognition in young adults. , 2013, Gait & posture.

[20]  Anne Shumway-Cook,et al.  Factors influencing dynamic prioritization during dual-task walking in healthy young adults. , 2013, Gait & posture.

[21]  W. Sparrow,et al.  Ageing effects on the attention demands of walking. , 2002, Human movement science.

[22]  U. Lindenberger,et al.  Cognitive performance is improved while walking: Differences in cognitive–sensorimotor couplings between children and young adults , 2010 .

[23]  J. Hidler,et al.  Biomechanics of overground vs. treadmill walking in healthy individuals. , 2008, Journal of applied physiology.

[24]  S. Jaeggi,et al.  The concurrent validity of the N-back task as a working memory measure , 2010, Memory.

[25]  K. Newell,et al.  Walking speed influences on gait cycle variability. , 2007, Gait & posture.

[26]  G. Borm,et al.  The effect of cognitive dual tasks on balance during walking in physically fit elderly people. , 2007, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[27]  U. Nayak,et al.  The effect of age on variability in gait. , 1984, Journal of gerontology.

[28]  Emily Fox,et al.  Interactions between cognitive tasks and gait after stroke: a dual task study. , 2008, Gait & posture.

[29]  O. Bock,et al.  Age-Related Deficits of Dual-Task Walking: A Review , 2012, Neural plasticity.

[30]  Residual attentional capacity during dual and triple task walking , 2008 .