Process planning methodology: dynamic short‐term planning for off‐site construction in Slovenia

Planning is a vital element of project management but it is still not recognized as a process variable. Its objective should be to outperform the initially defined processes, and foresee and overcome possible undesirable events. Detailed task‐level master planning is unrealistic since one cannot accurately predict all the requirements and obstacles before work has even started. The process planning methodology (PPM) has thus been developed in order to overcome common problems of the overwhelming project complexity. The essential elements of the PPM are the process planning group (PPG), including a control team that dynamically links the production/site and management, and the planning algorithm embodied within two continuous‐improvement loops. The methodology was tested on a factory project in Slovenia and in four successive projects of a similar nature. In addition to a number of improvement ideas and enhanced communication, the applied PPM resulted in 32% higher total productivity, 6% total savings and created a synergistic project environment.

[1]  Malcolm Horner,et al.  Characteristic items - a new approach to pricing and controlling construction projects , 1996 .

[2]  John D. Sterman,et al.  System Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World , 2002 .

[3]  天坂 格郎.  Science SQC, new quality control principle : the quality strategy of Toyota , 2004 .

[4]  P. Thompson,et al.  Work Organisations: A critical introduction , 1990 .

[5]  Glenn Ballard,et al.  LOOKAHEAD PLANNING: THE MISSING LINK IN PRODUCTION CONTROL , 1997 .

[6]  Lauri Koskela,et al.  MANAGING THE THREE ASPECTS OF PRODUCTION IN CONSTRUCTION , 2002 .

[7]  大野 耐一,et al.  Toyota production system : beyond large-scale production , 1988 .

[8]  K. D. Lemon,et al.  A micro-computer application for managing construction productivity , 1991 .

[9]  O. Williamson.  Organization Theory: From Chester Barnard to the Present and Beyond , 1995 .

[10]  Stuart D. Green.  THE HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS OF LEAN CONSTRUCTION: CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES AND CONCEPTUAL CHASMS , 2002 .

[11]  森田 道也.  Kakuro Amasaka, Science SQC, New Quality Control Principle: The Quality Strategy of Toyota, Springer, 2004. , 2005 .

[12]  Olusegun O. Faniran,et al.  Structural equation model of project planning effectiveness , 2005 .

[13]  J. R. Illingworth,et al.  Construction Methods And Planning , 1993 .

[14]  Norman Bodek,et al.  Toyota Production System: Beyond Large-Scale Production , 1988 .

[15]  新郷 重夫,et al.  Non-stock production : the Shingo system for continuous improvement , 1988 .

[16]  門田 安弘.  The Toyota management system : linking the seven key functional areas , 1993 .

[17]  Gary David Holt,et al.  Factors impacting construction project duration: a comparison between France, Germany and the u.k. , 1998 .

[18]  Stuart D. Green.  The missing arguments of lean construction , 1999 .

[19]  Herman Glenn Ballard,et al.  THE LAST PLANNER SYSTEM OF PRODUCTION CONTROL , 2000 .

[20]  Assem Al-Hajj,et al.  Modelling the running costs of buildings , 1998 .

[21]  Stanley Goldhaber,et al.  Construction management: Principles and practices , 1977 .

[22]  Asim Karim,et al.  Construction scheduling, cost optimization, and management : a new model based on neurocomputing and object technologies , 2001 .

[23]  Daniel Roos,et al.  The machine that changed the world : the story of lean production , 1991 .

[24]  Bengt Klefsjö,et al.  The machine that changed the world , 2008 .

[25]  Peter Williams,et al.  Construction planning, programming, and control , 1998 .

[26]  Yasuhiro Monden.  Toyota Management System: Linking the Seven Key Functional Areas , 1993 .

[27]  H. W. Parker,et al.  Productivity improvement in construction , 1988 .