Fuzzy Surrogate Safety Metrics for real-time assessment of rear-end collision risk. A study based on empirical observations.

The present paper discusses two fuzzy Surrogate Safety Metrics (SSMs) for rear-end collision, the Proactive Fuzzy SSM (PFS) and Critical Fuzzy SSM (CFS). The objective is to investigate their applicability for evaluating the real-time rear-end risk of collision of vehicles to support the operations of advanced driver assistance and automated vehicle functionalities (from driving assistance systems to fully automated vehicles). The proposed Fuzzy SSMs are evaluated and compared to other traditional metrics on the basis of empirical observations. To achieve this goal, an experimental campaign was organized in the AstaZero proving ground in Sweden. The campaign consisted of two main parts: a car-following experiment with five vehicles solely driven by Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) systems and a safety critical experiment, testing the response of the Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) system to avoid collisions on a static target. The proposed PFS is compared with the safe distance defined by the well-known Responsibility Sensitive Safety (RSS) model, showing that it can produce meaningful results in assessing safety conditions also without the use of crisp safety thresholds (like in the case of RSS). The CFS outperformed the well-known Time-To-Collision (TTC) SSM in the a-priori identification of the cases, where the tested vehicles were not able to avoid the collision with the static target. Moreover, results show that CFS at the time of the first deceleration is correlated with the velocity of the vehicle at the time of collisions with the target.

[1]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Analytic methods in accident research: Methodological frontier and future directions , 2014 .

[2]  Jessica B. Cicchino,et al.  Effectiveness of forward collision warning and autonomous emergency braking systems in reducing front-to-rear crash rates. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Enhanced intelligent driver model to access the impact of driving strategies on traffic capacity , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[4]  Vicente Milanés Montero,et al.  A fuzzy aid rear-end collision warning/avoidance system , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[5]  Biagio Ciuffo,et al.  Fuzzy surrogate safety metrics , 2019, 2019 6th International Conference on Models and Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems (MT-ITS).

[6]  Biagio Ciuffo,et al.  Analyzing the Impact of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control Systems on Traffic Flow and Energy Consumption in a Real Freeway Scenario , 2018 .

[7]  Åse Svensson,et al.  A method for analysing the traffic process in a safety perspective , 1998 .

[8]  C. Hydén THE DEVELOPMENT OF A METHOD FOR TRAFFIC SAFETY EVALUATION: THE SWEDISH TRAFFIC CONFLICTS TECHNIQUE , 1987 .

[9]  Nicolas Saunier,et al.  Review of current study methods for VRU safety. Appendix 6 – Scoping review: surrogate measures of safety in site-based road traffic observations: Deliverable 2.1 – part 4. , 2016 .

[10]  Yan Kuang,et al.  A tree-structured crash surrogate measure for freeways. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[11]  Ye Li,et al.  Evaluating the safety impact of adaptive cruise control in traffic oscillations on freeways. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[12]  Sarvani Sonduru Pantangi,et al.  The effects of driver fatigue, gender, and distracted driving on perceived and observed aggressive driving behavior: A correlated grouped random parameters bivariate probit approach , 2019, Analytic Methods in Accident Research.

[13]  Andrew P. Tarko,et al.  Chapter 17. Surrogate Measures of Safety , 2018 .

[14]  S. M. Sohel Mahmud,et al.  Micro-simulation modelling for traffic safety: A review and potential application to heterogeneous traffic environment , 2019, IATSS Research.

[15]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[16]  S. Shladover The Truth about "Self-Driving" Cars. , 2016, Scientific American.

[17]  V. A. Güttinger,et al.  Conflict Observation in Theory and in Practice , 1984 .

[18]  C. Hydén,et al.  Evaluation of traffic safety, based on micro-level behavioural data: theoretical framework and first implementation. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[19]  Ramon E. Moore,et al.  Interval analysis and fuzzy set theory , 2003, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[20]  Eleni I. Vlahogianni,et al.  Fuzzy Modeling of Freeway Accident Duration with Rainfall and Traffic Flow Interactions , 2015 .

[21]  Basil K. Papadopoulos,et al.  Framework for fuzzy surrogate metrics for modeling road safety , 2019, CENTRAL EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON THERMOPHYSICS 2019 (CEST).

[22]  Benoit Vanholme,et al.  Highly Automated Driving on Highways Based on Legal Safety , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[23]  Daniele Borio,et al.  Estimating reaction time in Adaptive Cruise Control System , 2018, 2018 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV).

[24]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Bayesian hierarchical modeling of the non-stationary traffic conflict extremes for crash estimation , 2019, Analytic Methods in Accident Research.

[25]  Amnon Shashua,et al.  Vision Zero: on a Provable Method for Eliminating Roadway Accidents without Compromising Traffic Throughput , 2019, ArXiv.

[26]  S. M. Sohel Mahmud,et al.  Application of proximal surrogate indicators for safety evaluation: A review of recent developments and research needs , 2017 .

[27]  P. G. Gipps,et al.  A behavioural car-following model for computer simulation , 1981 .

[28]  Stijn Daniels,et al.  In search of the severity dimension of traffic events: Extended Delta-V as a traffic conflict indicator. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[29]  Meng Wang,et al.  Comparative Assessment of Safety Indicators for Vehicle Trajectories on Highways , 2016 .

[30]  Andrew P Tarko,et al.  Estimating the expected number of crashes with traffic conflicts and the Lomax Distribution - A theoretical and numerical exploration. , 2018, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[31]  William R. McShane,et al.  A review of pedestrian safety models for urban areas in Low and Middle Income Countries , 2016 .