Chatbots, Humbots, and the Quest for Artificial General Intelligence

What began as a quest for artificial general intelligence branched into several pursuits, including intelligent assistants developed by tech companies and task-oriented chatbots that deliver more information or services in specific domains. Progress quickened with the spread of low-latency networking, then accelerated dramatically a few years ago. In 2016, task-focused chatbots became a centerpiece of machine intelligence, promising interfaces that are more engaging than robotic answering systems and that can accommodate our increasingly phone-based information needs. Hundreds of thousands were built. Creating successful non-trivial chatbots proved more difficult than anticipated. Some developers now design for human-chatbot (humbot) teams, with people handling difficult queries. This paper describes the conversational agent space, difficulties in meeting user expectations, potential new design approaches, uses of human-bot hybrids, and implications for the ultimate goal of creating software with general intelligence.

[1]  michel.  The rise of 'pseudo-AI' : how tech firms quietly use humans to do bots' work - e-traces , 2018 .

[2]  Shwetak N. Patel,et al.  Evaluating and Informing the Design of Chatbots , 2018, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[3]  Yasaman Khazaeni,et al.  All Work and No Play? Conversations with a Question-and-Answer Chatbot in the Wild , 2018, CHI 2018.

[4]  Rachel K. E. Bellamy,et al.  At Face Value , 2021, Bigger Than Life.

[5]  Yasaman Khazaeni,et al.  All Work and No Play? , 2018, CHI.

[6]  Harry Shum,et al.  From Eliza to XiaoIce: challenges and opportunities with social chatbots , 2018, Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering.

[7]  Yunhong Wang,et al.  CoChat: Enabling Bot and Human Collaboration for Task Completion , 2018, AAAI.

[8]  Jennifer Zamora,et al.  I'm Sorry, Dave, I'm Afraid I Can't Do That: Chatbot Perception and Expectations , 2017, HAI.

[9]  Jaime Teevan,et al.  Calendar.help: Designing a Workflow-Based Scheduling Agent with Humans in the Loop , 2017, CHI.

[10]  Filippo Menczer,et al.  Online Human-Bot Interactions: Detection, Estimation, and Characterization , 2017, ICWSM.

[11]  Joann Cattlin,et al.  Simple online privacy for Australia , 2016, First Monday.

[12]  Abigail Sellen,et al.  "Like Having a Really Bad PA": The Gulf between User Expectation and Experience of Conversational Agents , 2016, CHI.

[13]  Samuel C. Woolley,et al.  Automating power: Social bot interference in global politics , 2016, First Monday.

[14]  Filippo Menczer,et al.  The rise of social bots , 2014, Commun. ACM.

[15]  David W. McDonald,et al.  Dissecting a Social Botnet: Growth, Content and Influence in Twitter , 2015, CSCW.

[16]  M. Leake.  Innovative Science : The London Times, Letter to the Editor , 2015 .

[17]  H. Ishiguro,et al.  The thing that should not be: predictive coding and the uncanny valley in perceiving human and humanoid robot actions , 2011, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[18]  Pattie Maes,et al.  Agents that reduce work and information overload , 1994, CACM.

[19]  L. Suchman.  Plans and situated actions , 1987 .

[20]  Daniel G. Bobrow,et al.  A frame driven dialog system , 1980 .

[21]  Daniel G. Bobrow,et al.  GUS, A Frame-Driven Dialog System , 1986, Artif. Intell..

[22]  Joseph Weizenbaum,et al.  ELIZA—a computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine , 1966, CACM.

[23]  J. C. R. Licklider,et al.  Man-Computer Symbiosis , 1960 .