AGRI-ENVIRONMENTAL POLICIES IN A TRANSITIONAL ECONOMY: THE VALUE OF AGRICULTURAL BIODIVERSITY IN HUNGARIAN HOME GARDENS

"Agricultural biodiversity is an environmental resource. Much of the agricultural biodiversity remaining in situ today is found on the semi-subsistence farms of poorer countries and the small-scale farms or home gardens of more industrialized nations. The traditional small farms of Hungary are labelled “home gardens” as a reflection of their institutional identity during the collectivisation period. Homesteads managed with family labor, they continue to serve essential food security and diet quality functions during economic transition. Home gardens contribute to the preservation of rural settlements and cultural heritage, and they contain relatively high levels of several components of agricultural biodiversity. The role of home gardens in the agri-environmental program that is now being formulated by Hungary and the European Union has not been elucidated, though the stated goal of these policies is to support multifunctional agriculture. This study estimates the private value that Hungarian farmers assign to home gardens and their biodiversity attributes, and indicates how such information might be used in designing least-cost mechanisms to support their maintenance as part of the national agri-environmental program." Authors' Abstract

[1]  THE MULTIFUNCTIONAL CHARACTER OF AGRICULTURE AND LAND , 1999 .

[2]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior , 1959 .

[3]  Gordon H. Orians,et al.  The Preservation and valuation of biological resources , 1990 .

[4]  K. Lancaster,et al.  Consumer Demand. A New Approach. , 1972 .

[5]  J. Braun,et al.  Russian poverty: Muddling through economic transition with garden plots , 1998 .

[6]  J. Pender,et al.  Impacts of programs and organizations on the adoption of sustainable land management technologies in Uganda , 2003 .

[7]  M. Stocking,et al.  Cultivating biodiversity: understanding, analysing and using agricultural diversity. , 2002 .

[8]  Andreas Kontoleon.  Essays on non-market valuation of environmental resources: policy and technical explorations. , 2003 .

[9]  J. Lankoski.  Multifunctional character of agriculture. , 2000 .

[10]  D. McFadden.  Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .

[11]  J. Taylor,et al.  Implications for the Conservation of Wheat Landraces in Turkey from a Household Model of Varietal Choice , 1998 .

[12]  N. Hanley,et al.  Using Choice Experiments to Value the Environment , 1998 .

[13]  P. Schmidt,et al.  Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. , 1984 .

[14]  J. Taylor,et al.  Technology adoption and biological diversity in Andean potato agriculture , 1992 .

[15]  J. Bennett,et al.  The choice modelling approach to environmental valuation , 2001 .

[16]  M. Smale,et al.  Maize Diversity, Variety Attributes, and Farmers’ Choices in Southeastern Guanajuato, Mexico* , 2001, Economic Development and Cultural Change.

[17]  C. Reij,et al.  THE EMERGENCE AND SPREADING OF AN IMPROVED TRADITIONAL SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION PRACTICE IN BURKINA FASO , 2004 .

[18]  R. Scarpa,et al.  Valuing genetic resources in peasant economies: the case of ‘hairless’ creole pigs in Yucatan , 2003, Ecological Economics.

[19]  Prabhu Pingali,et al.  Confronting the environmental consequences of the Green Revolution in Asia , 1994 .

[20]  M. Stocking,et al.  Agrodiversity: definition, description and design , 1999 .

[21]  M. Meurs.  Many shades of red : state policy and collective agriculture , 1999 .

[22]  H. Theil.  Introduction to econometrics , 1978 .

[23]  Michael Steinberg.  Exploring Agrodiversity , 2002 .

[24]  Edward R. Morey,et al.  Investigating Preference Heterogeneity in a Repeated Discrete-Choice Recreation Demand Model of Atlantic Salmon Fishing , 2000, Marine Resource Economics.

[25]  D. Lewis,et al.  An Integrated Economic and Social Analysis to Assess the Impact of Vegetable and Fishpond Technologies on Poverty in Rural Bangladesh , 2003 .

[26]  P. Boxall,et al.  Future Directions of Stated Choice Methods for Environment Valuation , 2001 .

[27]  D. Spencer.  Infrastructure and Technology Constraints to Agricultural Development in the Humid and Subhumid Tropics of Africa , 1996 .

[28]  Van Dusen,et al.  IN SITU CONSERVATION OF CROP GENETIC RESOURCES IN THE MEXICAN MILPA SYSTEM , 2000 .

[29]  D. Dubois,et al.  Soil Fertility and Biodiversity in Organic Farming , 2002, Science.