When Subgroups Secede: Extending and Refining the Social Psychological Model of Schism in Groups

This article is about a field study (N = 1,080) concerning the secession of a subgroup from the Church of England, and it is aimed at extending and refining the existing social psychological model of schisms in groups. It was found that the first step toward a schism is the belief that the group identity has been subverted. This belief will prompt negative emotions (i.e., dejection and agitation) and decrease both group identification and perceived group entitativity (i.e., cohesion, oneness). In turn, low group entitativity will reduce the level of group identification. Finally, low group identification and high negative emotions will increase schismatic intentions. It is also demonstrated that the negative impact of group identification, and the positive impact of negative emotions, on schismatic intentions is moderated by the perceived ability to voice dissent (i.e., the greater the perceived voice, the weaker the impact).

[1]  Lester F. Ward,et al.  Social Psychology: An Outline and Source Book , 1908 .

[2]  J. Stainer,et al.  The Emotions , 1922, Nature.

[3]  L. Doob.  The psychology of social norms. , 1937 .

[4]  L. Festinger.  Informal social communication. , 1950, Psychological review.

[5]  A. A. Nwankwo,et al.  The making of a nation : Biafra , 1969 .

[6]  H. Barnes,et al.  The Making of a Nation , 1970 .

[7]  P. Bentler,et al.  Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures , 1980 .

[8]  A. Savoye.  Les continuateurs de Le Play au tournant du siècle , 1981 .

[9]  L. Mamiya,et al.  From Black Muslim to Bilalian: The Evolution of a Movement , 1982 .

[10]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  C. Husbands.  Extreme right‐wing politics in great Britain: The recent marginalisation of the national front , 1988 .

[12]  J. Defrance.  Un schisme sportif [Clivages structurels, scissions et oppositions dans les sports athlétiques, 1960-1980] , 1989 .

[13]  M. Hogg,et al.  Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. , 1989 .

[14]  E. Rochford.  Factionalism, Group Defection, and Schism in the Hare Krishna Movement , 1989 .

[15]  S. Hinkle,et al.  Intragroup identification and intergroup differentiation: A multicomponent approach , 1989 .

[16]  P. Bentler,et al.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  Ira J. Roseman.  Appraisal determinants of discrete emotions. , 1991 .

[18]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[19]  John C. Turner,et al.  Self and Collective: Cognition and Social Context , 1994 .

[20]  Deborah A. Prentice,et al.  Asymmetries in Attachments to Groups and to their Members: Distinguishing between Common-Identity and Common-Bond Groups , 1994 .

[21]  Fred A. Mael,et al.  LOYAL FROM DAY ONE: BIODATA, ORGANIZATIONAL IDENTIFICATION, AND TURNOVER AMONG NEWCOMERS , 1995 .

[22]  Naomi Ellemers,et al.  PERCEIVED INTRAGROUP VARIABILITY AS A FUNCTION OF GROUP STATUS AND IDENTIFICATION , 1995 .

[23]  K. Deaux,et al.  Relationship between social and personal identities: Segregation or integration. , 1996 .

[24]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  An In-Group Becomes Part of the Self: Response Time Evidence , 1996 .

[25]  Marilynn B. Brewer,et al.  Seeing groups as entities: The role of perceiver motivation. , 1996 .

[26]  E. Higgins,et al.  Beyond pleasure and pain. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[27]  John C. Turner,et al.  The group as a basis for emergent stereotype consensus. , 1997 .

[28]  Steven J. Sherman,et al.  Perceiving social groups: The importance of the entitativity continuum. , 1998 .

[29]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[30]  F. Sani,et al.  When consensus fails: an analysis of the schism within the Italian Communist Party (1991) , 1998 .

[31]  F. Sani,et al.  Identity, Argument and Schism: Two Longitudinal Studies of the Split in the Church of England over the Ordination of Women to the Priesthood , 1999 .

[32]  Tom R. Tyler,et al.  Justice, social identity, and group processes. , 1999 .

[33]  John C. Turner,et al.  Social Identity Salience and the Emergence of Stereotype Consensus , 1999 .

[34]  N. Ellemers,et al.  Self‐categorisation, commitment to the group and group self‐esteem as related but distinct aspects of social identity , 1999 .

[35]  R. MacCallum,et al.  Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. , 2000, Annual review of psychology.

[36]  Vincent Yzerbyt,et al.  The Primacy of the Ingroup: The Interplay of Entitativity and Identification , 2000 .

[37]  F Sani,et al.  Contested identities and schisms in groups: opposing the ordination of women as priests in the Church of England. , 2000, The British journal of social psychology.

[38]  Michael A. Hogg,et al.  Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Group Processes , 2001 .

[39]  Victor J. Callan,et al.  Employee Adjustment to an Organizational Merger: An Intergroup Perspective , 2001 .

[40]  D. van Knippenberg,et al.  Organizational identification after a merger: a social identity perspective. , 2002, The British journal of social psychology.

[41]  Steven J. Sherman,et al.  A Group By Any Other Name—The Role of Entitativity in Group Perception , 2002 .

[42]  John Todman,et al.  Should We Stay or Should We Go? A Social Psychological Model of Schisms in Groups , 2002 .

[43]  Vincent Yzerbyt,et al.  Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.175 We are one and I like it: The impact of ingroup , 2022 .

[44]  Bernd Simon,et al.  Respect for Group Members: Intragroup Determinants of Collective Identification and Group-Serving Behavior , 2003, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[45]  Naomi Ellemers,et al.  Continuing and Changing Group Identities: The Effects of Merging on Social Identification and Ingroup Bias , 2003, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[46]  H. Tajfel,et al.  The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. , 2004 .

[47]  J. Dickie.  Cosa Nostra. A History of the Sicilian Mafia , 2004 .

[48]  F. Sani,et al.  The fundamentality of group principles and perceived group entitativity , 2005 .

[49]  D. Campbell.  Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities , 2007 .

[50]  E.,et al.  Self-Discrepancy : A Theory Relating Self and Affect , 2022 .