Is the go/no-go lexical decision task an alternative to the yes/no lexical decision task?
暂无分享,去创建一个
Manuel Perea | Eva Rosa | Manuel Perea | Manuel Perea | E. Rosa | Consolación Gómez | Consolación Gómez
[1] G. Stone,et al. Strategic control of processing in word recognition. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[2] Philip L. Smith,et al. Stochastic Dynamic Models of Response Time and Accuracy: A Foundational Primer. , 2000, Journal of mathematical psychology.
[3] S. Lupker,et al. Effects of word frequency and spelling-to-sound regularity in naming with and without preceding lexical decision. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[4] K I Forster,et al. The prime lexicality effect: form-priming as a function of prime awareness, lexical status, and discrimination difficulty. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[5] Rolf Ulrich,et al. Donders's assumption of pure insertion: an evaluation on the basis of response dynamics , 1999 .
[6] K. Heyer,et al. Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? Repetition blocking suggests the affirmative. , 1988 .
[7] D. Balota,et al. Where are the effects of frequency in visual word recognition tasks? Right where we said they were! Comment on Monsell, Doyle, and Haggard (1989). , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[8] David M. Lane,et al. PsychLib: A library of machine language routines for controlling psychology experiments on the Apple Macintosh computer , 1987 .
[9] A. Pollatsek,et al. The effects of neighborhood frequency in reading and lexical decision. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[10] C. Chiarello,et al. Lexical decision and naming asymmetries: Influence of response selection and response bias , 1988, Brain and Language.
[11] Roger Ratcliff,et al. A diffusion model account of the lexical decision task. , 2004, Psychological review.
[12] D. Balota,et al. Word frequency, repetition, and lexicality effects in word recognition tasks: beyond measures of central tendency. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[13] G R Grice,et al. What makes targets redundant? , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.
[14] E. Zaidel,et al. Effect of response programming on hemispheric differences in lexical decision , 1990, Neuropsychologia.
[15] R. Ratcliff. Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.
[16] D. Balota,et al. Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[17] M. S. Mayzner,et al. Human information processing : tutorials in performance and cognition , 1975 .
[18] J Grainger,et al. Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: a multiple read-out model. , 1996, Psychological review.
[19] K. Rayner,et al. Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: Word frequency effects and individual differences , 1998, Memory & cognition.
[20] Robert G Pachella,et al. The Interpretation of Reaction Time in Information-Processing Research 1 , 1973, Human Information Processing.
[21] F. Donders. On the speed of mental processes. , 1969, Acta psychologica.
[22] Douglas L. Chute,et al. Accurate millisecond timing on Apple’s Macintosh using Drexel’s MilliTimer , 1986 .
[23] Allan Collins,et al. A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing , 1975 .
[24] F. Donders,et al. Over de snelheid van psychische Processen , 1868 .
[25] J. H. Neely. Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. , 1991 .
[26] A. Pollatsek,et al. Evidence for the use of assembled phonology in accessing the meaning of printed words. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[27] Saul Sternberg,et al. The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method , 1969 .
[28] Roger W. Schvaneveldt,et al. Frequency and pronounceability in visually presented naming and lexical decision tasks. , 1987 .
[29] A Pollatsek,et al. On the use of counterbalanced designs in cognitive research: a suggestion for a better and more powerful analysis. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[30] David A. Balota,et al. Mental Chronometry: Beyond Reaction Time , 1991 .
[31] B. Gordon. Subjective frequency and the lexical decision latency function: Implications for mechanisms of lexical access. , 1985 .
[32] R W Schvaneveldt,et al. An activation--verification model for letter and word recognition: the word-superiority effect. , 1982, Psychological review.
[33] G C Van Orden,et al. Pathway selection's utility for control of word recognition. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[34] Alfonso Caramazza,et al. Lexical decision for open- and closed-class words: Failure to replicate differential frequency sensitivity , 1982, Brain and Language.
[35] Michael C. Doyle,et al. Effects of frequency on visual word recognition tasks: where are they? , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[36] Michael Garman,et al. Psycholinguistics: Accessing the mental lexicon , 1990 .
[37] Yasushi Hino,et al. Effects of word frequency and spelling-to-sound regularity in naming with and without preceding lexical decision. , 2000 .
[38] Roger Ratcliff,et al. A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .
[39] Barry Gordon,et al. Lexical access and lexical decision: Mechanisms of frequency sensitivity. , 1983 .
[40] James L. McClelland,et al. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .
[41] C. Davis,et al. Masked Homophone and Pseudohomophone Priming in Children and Adults , 1998 .
[42] David A. Balota,et al. Word frequency, repetition, and lexicality effects in word recognition tasks: beyond measures of central tendency. , 1999 .
[43] A Pollatsek,et al. The effects of "neighborhood size" in reading and lexical decision. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[44] Christopher T. Kello,et al. Strategic control in word reading: evidence from speeded responding in the tempo-naming task. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[45] Jeanette Altarriba,et al. Depth of spreading activation revisited: Semantic mediated priming occurs in lexical decisions , 1988 .
[46] A. Jacobs,et al. On the role of competing word units in visual word recognition: The neighborhood frequency effect , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.
[47] A. D. Groot,et al. Primed Lexical Decision: Combined Effects of the Proportion of Related Prime-Target Pairs and the Stimulus-Onset Asynchrony of Prime and Target , 1984 .
[48] James L. McClelland. On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade. , 1979 .
[49] S. Sternberg. The discovery of processing stages , 1969 .
[50] Yasushi Hino,et al. Effects of Polysemy in Lexical Decision and Naming: An Alternative to Lexical Access Accounts , 1996 .
[51] F. Cuetos,et al. Diccionario de frecuencias de las unidades lingüísticas del castellano , 1995 .
[52] Stephen J. Lupker,et al. The Effects of Word Frequency for Japanese Kana and Kanji Words in Naming and Lexical Decision: Can the Dual-Route Model Save the Lexical-Selection Account? , 1998 .
[53] Kenneth I. Forster,et al. No enemies in the neighborhood: absence of inhibitory neighborhood effects in lexical decision and semantic categorization. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[54] G. Humphreys,et al. Basic processes in reading : visual word recognition , 1993 .