An empirical analysis of the relationship between environmental performance and sustainable e-governance in China

Abstract This empirical study attempts to identify the relationship between regional environmental performance and the environmental e-governance level of local governments in China. Following the voluntary disclosure and socio-political theories, we hypothesize that environmental performance is related to the level of environmental e-governance. These two competing theories provide opposite predictions on the relationship being studied, and previous studies are largely inconclusive. Thus, in this study, we develop a two-stage procedure to investigate this relationship. In the first stage, the composite environmental performance indicator is calculated based on a generalized directional distance function. In the second stage, structural equation modeling is used to investigate the potential relationship between environmental performance and the environmental e-governance level. An empirical study is conducted on China's 30 provincial governments using 2007–2010 data. The empirical results indicate that there is no significant relationship between environmental performance and environmental e-governance level. Finally, some policy suggestions on the role of intermediary for sustainable Chinese e-governance are proposed.

[1]  Ramakrishnan Ramanathan,et al.  Combining indicators of energy consumption and CO 2 emissions: a cross-country comparison , 2002 .

[2]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  On the evaluation of structural equation models , 1988 .

[3]  J. Bi,et al.  Eco-efficiency analysis of industrial system in China: A data envelopment analysis approach , 2008 .

[4]  Yanrui Wu,et al.  China’s Capital Stock Series by Region and Sector , 2016 .

[5]  Yue Li,et al.  Disclosure of environmental information by Canadian manufacturing companies: A voluntary disclosure perspective , 2000 .

[6]  The Role of Intermediation in the Governance of Sustainable Chinese Web Marketing , 2014 .

[7]  G. Richardson,et al.  Corporate Disclosure of Environmental Liability Information: Theory and Evidence* , 1997 .

[8]  Sarah Golden,et al.  Corporate environmental disclosures: are they useful in determining environmental performance? , 2001 .

[9]  Ning Zhang,et al.  A note on the evolution of directional distance function and its development in energy and environmental studies 1997–2013 , 2014 .

[10]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Productivity and Undesirable Outputs: A Directional Distance Function Approach , 1995 .

[11]  Sulaiman A. Al-Tuwaijri,et al.  The Relations Among Environmental Disclosure, Environmental Performance, and Economic Performance: A Simultaneous Equations Approach , 2004 .

[12]  Yan Li,et al.  CSR and Service Brand: The Mediating Effect of Brand Identification and Moderating Effect of Service Quality , 2011 .

[13]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.

[14]  Peter M. Clarkson,et al.  Revisiting the Relation between Environmental Performance and Environmental Disclosure: An Empirical Analysis , 2006 .

[15]  Surender Kumar,et al.  Environmentally Sensitive Productivity Growth: A Global Analysis Using Malmquist-Luenberger Index , 2006 .

[16]  Hui Wang,et al.  Energy and CO2 emission performance in electricity generation: A non-radial directional distance function approach , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  Ning Zhang,et al.  Total-factor carbon emission performance of fossil fuel power plants in China: A metafrontier non-radial Malmquist index analysis , 2013 .

[18]  Peng Zhou,et al.  A survey of data envelopment analysis in energy and environmental studies , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  Ning Zhang,et al.  Energy efficiency, CO2 emission performance and technology gaps in fossil fuel electricity generation in Korea: A meta-frontier non-radial directional distance functionanalysis , 2013 .

[20]  William L. Weber,et al.  Productivity Growth and Pollution in State Manufacturing , 2001, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[21]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Comparing MCDA Aggregation Methods in Constructing Composite Indicators Using the Shannon-Spearman Measure , 2009 .

[22]  Fanbin Kong,et al.  Measuring sustainability performance for China: A sequential generalized directional distance function approach , 2014 .

[23]  Sebastián Lozano,et al.  Non-parametric frontier approach to modelling the relationships among population, GDP, energy consumption and CO2 emissions , 2008 .

[24]  R. Ingram,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE AND CORPORATE DISCLOSURE , 1980 .

[25]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Directional distance functions and slacks-based measures of efficiency , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[26]  Diego Prior,et al.  Environmental externalities and efficiency measurement. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[27]  P. Zhou,et al.  Efficiency and abatement costs of energy-related CO2 emissions in China: A slacks-based efficiency measure , 2012 .

[28]  Andrés J. Picazo-Tadeo,et al.  Assessing eco-efficiency with directional distance functions , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[29]  J. Wiseman,et al.  An evaluation of environmental disclosures made in corporate annual reports , 1982 .

[30]  R. Dye.  DISCLOSURE OF NONPROPRIETARY INFORMATION , 1985 .

[31]  Dennis M. Patten.  The relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: a research note , 2002 .