Comparing technologies for municipal solid waste management using life cycle assessment methodology: a Belgian case study

PurposeThe present study aims at identifying the best practice in residual municipal solid waste management using specific data from Liège, a highly industrialized and densely populated region of Belgium. We also illustrate the importance of assumptions relative to energy through sensitivity analyses and checking uncertainties regarding the results using a Monte Carlo analysis.MethodsWe consider four distinct household waste management scenarios. A life cycle assessment is made for each of them using the ReCiPe method. The first scenario is sanitary landfill, which is considered as the base case. In the second scenario, the refuse-derived fuel fraction is incinerated and a sanitary landfill is used for the remaining shredded organic and inert waste only. The third scenario consists in incinerating the whole fraction of municipal solid waste. In the fourth scenario, the biodegradable fraction is collected and the remaining waste is incinerated. The extracted biodegradable fraction is then treated in an anaerobic digestion plant.Results and discussionThe present study shows that various scenarios have significantly different environmental impact. Compared to sanitary landfill, scenario 4 has a highly reduced environmental impact in terms of climate change and particulate matter formation. An environmental gain, equal to 10, 37, or 1.3 times the impact of scenario 1 is obtained for, respectively, human toxicity, mineral depletion, and fossil fuel depletion categories. These environmental gains are due to energetic valorization via the incineration and anaerobic digestion. Considering specific categories, greenhouse gas emissions are reduced by 17 % in scenario 2 and by 46 % in scenarios 3 and 4. For the particulate matter formation category, a 71 % reduction is achieved by scenario 3. The figures are slightly modified by the Monte Carlo analysis but the ranking of the scenarios is left unchanged.ConclusionsThe present study shows that replacing a sanitary landfill by efficient incineration significantly reduces both emissions of pollutants and energy depletion, thanks to electricity recovery.

[1]  Anna Björklund,et al.  What life-cycle assessment does and does not do in assessments of waste management. , 2007, Waste management.

[2]  Bernie Thomas,et al.  International expert group on life cycle assessment for integrated waste management , 2003 .

[3]  T. H. Christensen,et al.  Anaerobic digestion and digestate use: accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contribution , 2009, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[4]  Maria Laura Mastellone,et al.  THE ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE OF ALTERNATIVE SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT OPTIONS: A LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT STUDY , 2003 .

[5]  E Forssberg,et al.  An overview of recovery of metals from slags. , 2003, Waste management.

[6]  Jinglan Hong,et al.  Life cycle assessment of four municipal solid waste management scenarios in China. , 2010, Waste management.

[7]  P Buttol,et al.  LCA of integrated MSW management systems: case study of the Bologna District. , 2007, Waste management.

[8]  Silvia Bargigli,et al.  Life cycle assessment (LCA) of waste management strategies: Landfilling, sorting plant and incineration , 2009 .

[9]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  Application of uncertainty and variability in LCA , 1998 .

[10]  Arianna Dominici Loprieno,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of waste management systems in Italian industrial areas: Case study of 1st Macrolotto of Prato , 2009 .

[11]  Thomas H Christensen,et al.  Environmental assessment of solid waste landfilling technologies by means of LCA-modeling. , 2009, Waste management.

[12]  Markus A. Reuter,et al.  The Amsterdam pilot on bottom ash , 2004 .

[13]  Muhammad Arshad,et al.  The anaerobic digestion of solid organic waste. , 2011, Waste management.

[14]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  Allocation and 'what-if' scenarios in life cycle assessment of waste management systems. , 2007, Waste management.

[15]  Julian Cleary,et al.  Life cycle assessments of municipal solid waste management systems: a comparative analysis of selected peer-reviewed literature. , 2009, Environment international.

[16]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  Life cycle assessment of energy from solid waste—part 1: general methodology and results , 2005 .

[17]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  Models for waste life cycle assessment: review of technical assumptions. , 2010, Waste management.

[18]  J la Cour Jansen,et al.  A life cycle approach to the management of household food waste - A Swedish full-scale case study. , 2011, Waste management.

[19]  Stefan Salhofer,et al.  Landfill modelling in LCA - a contribution based on empirical data. , 2007, Waste management.

[20]  Fulvia Tambone,et al.  Assessing amendment and fertilizing properties of digestates from anaerobic digestion through a comparative study with digested sludge and compost. , 2010, Chemosphere.

[21]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  Part II: Dealing with parameter uncertainty and uncertainty due to choices in life cycle assessment , 1998 .

[22]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  Life cycle assessment of energy from solid waste—part 2: landfilling compared to other treatment methods , 2005 .

[23]  M D Bovea,et al.  Alternative scenarios to meet the demands of sustainable waste management. , 2006, Journal of environmental management.

[24]  Bernd Bilitewski,et al.  Comparative evaluation of life cycle assessment models for solid waste management. , 2007 .

[25]  T. Sabbasa,et al.  Management of municipal solid waste incineration residues , 2003 .

[26]  J.G.P. Born.  Quantities and Qualities of Municipal Waste Incinerator Residues in the Netherlands , 1994 .

[27]  Guido Sonnemann,et al.  Uncertainty assessment by a Monte Carlo simulation in a life cycle inventory of electricity produced by a waste incinerator , 2003 .

[28]  Fabrizio Passarini,et al.  Environmental impacts of waste incineration in a regional system (Emilia Romagna, Italy) evaluated from a life cycle perspective. , 2008, Journal of hazardous materials.

[29]  Mario Grosso,et al.  A quantitative estimate of potential aluminium recovery from incineration bottom ashes , 2011 .

[30]  L Giusti,et al.  A review of waste management practices and their impact on human health. , 2009, Waste management.

[31]  Herminio Sastre,et al.  Life cycle analysis of municipal solid waste management possibilities in Asturias, Spain , 2003, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[32]  M D Bovea,et al.  Environmental assessment of alternative municipal solid waste management strategies. A Spanish case study. , 2010, Waste management.

[33]  T. H. Christensen,et al.  Composting and compost utilization: accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contributions , 2009, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[34]  S. Schmidt,et al.  Environmental modelling of use of treated organic waste on agricultural land: a comparison of existing models for life cycle assessment of waste systems , 2006, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[35]  Jakob Magid,et al.  Application of processed organic municipal solid waste on agricultural land – a scenario analysis , 2006 .