Effects of some ecological variables on carabid communities in native and non native forests in the Ibaizabal basin (Basque Country: Spain)

Abstract• Carabid beetles were investigated at five different forest types in the Ibaizabal basin (northern Spain). The landscape is characterized by the presence of remnants of native forest surrounded by conifer plantations.• Carabids were trapped in 52 stands of mixed forest, beech forest, holm oak forest, mixed pine and Monterey pine plantations in 2005 and 2006. The main objectives of the study were: compare carabid diversity, recognise the characteristic species, and study the effects of ecological variables on carabid assemblages in the different forest types.• No significative differences in species abundance, richness and diversity were found among the studied forests. Most of the trapped beetles were identified as forest generalists, nevertheless some native and non-native forest specialist species were also found. Distribution of carabid communities overlapped and, except for beech forest, no specific communities were distinguished. Altitude, percentage of grass coverage and temperature were the main variables influencing species distribution.• The results suggest high habitat homogeneity, caused by regeneration in pine plantations of the indigenous understorey, and by poor habitat quality in native forest (patchy remnants enclosed in conifer plantations). This situation could explain the similar carabid diversity.Résumé• Les carabidés ont été étudiés dans cinq différents types de forêts dans le bassin Ibaizabal (nord de l’Espagne). Le paysage est caractérisé par la présence de vestiges de la forêt naturelle entourés par des plantations de conifères.• Les carabidés ont été piégés en 2005 et 2006, dans 52 peuplements de forêts mixtes, hêtraies, chênaies vertes, peuplement mélangé de pins et plantations de pins de Monterey. Les principaux objectifs de l’étude ont été : la comparaison de la diversité des carabidés, la reconnaissance des espèces caractéristiques, et l’étude des effets des variables écologiques sur les assemblages de carabidés dans les différents types de forêts.• Parmi les forêts étudiées, il n’a pas été mis en évidence de différences significatives pour ce qui concerne l’abondance des espèces, la richesse et la diversité. La plupart des coléoptères piégés ont été identifiés comme étant des généralistes des forêts, néanmoins certaines espèces autochtones et non autochtones des forêts ont également été trouvées. Les répartitions des communautés de carabidés se chevauchent et, à l’exception des hêtraies, aucune communauté spécifique n’a été distinguée. L’altitude, le pourcentage de couverture herbacée et la température ont été les principales variables qui ont influencé la répartition des espèces.• Les résultats obtenus suggèrent que la haute homogénéité de l’habitat est causée par la régénération d’un sous-bois d’espèces naturelles dans les plantations de pins, et par la mauvaise qualité de l’habitat dans la forêt naturelle (restes fragmentaires de forêts entourés par des plantations de conifères). Cette situation pourrait expliquer la diversité similaire des carabidés.

[1]  J. Niemelä,et al.  The effects of forestry on carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in boreal forests , 2007, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[2]  J. Salgado,et al.  Traditional forest management: Do carabid beetles respond to human-created vegetation structures in an oak mosaic landscape? , 2006 .

[3]  J. Pearce,et al.  The use of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) and spiders (Araneae) as bioindicators of sustainable forest management: A review , 2006 .

[4]  B. Tóthmérész,et al.  The influence of matrix and edges on species richness patterns of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in habitat islands , 2006 .

[5]  Z. Elek,et al.  Impacts of Leaf-litter Addition on Carabids in a Conifer Plantation , 2005, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[6]  H. Jactel,et al.  Comparative responses of bird, carabid, and spider assemblages to stand and landscape diversity in maritime pine plantation forests , 2005 .

[7]  G. D. B. D. Warnaffe,et al.  Effects of forest management on carabid beetles in Belgium: implications for biodiversity conservation , 2004 .

[8]  R. Menéndez,et al.  Habitat-based conservation priorities for carabid beetles within the Picos de Europa National Park, northern Spain , 2004 .

[9]  M. S. Skeffington,et al.  The flora and carabid beetle fauna of a mature and regenerating semi-natural oak woodland in south-east Ireland , 2003 .

[10]  J. Niemelä,et al.  Ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) as bioindicators , 2003, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[11]  A. Petrioli,et al.  Comparative analysis of two edaphic zoocoenoses (Oribatid mites and Carabid beetles) in five habitats of the ‘Pietraporciana’ and ‘Lucciolabella’ Nature Reserves (Orcia Valley, central Italy) , 2002 .

[12]  T. Magura Carabids and forest edge: spatial pattern and edge effect , 2002 .

[13]  R. Ferris,et al.  Carabid beetle communities associated with coniferous plantations in Britain: the influence of site, ground vegetation and stand structure , 2001 .

[14]  J. Niemelä Carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) and habitat fragmentation: a review , 2001 .

[15]  Z. Elek,et al.  Impacts of non-native Norway spruce plantation on abundance and species richness of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) , 2001 .

[16]  B. Tóthmérész,et al.  Effects of nature management practice on carabid assemblages (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in a non-native plantation. , 2000 .

[17]  P. Brandmayr,et al.  The search for common anthropogenic impacts on biodiversity: a global network , 2000, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[18]  S. Hartley,et al.  THE EFFECT OF HABITAT STRUCTURE ON CARABID COMMUNITIES DURING THE REGENERATION OF A NATIVE SCOTTISH FOREST , 1999 .

[19]  C. Hawes,et al.  Relationships between insect diversity and habitat characteristics in plantation forests , 1999 .

[20]  M. Gormally,et al.  A comparison of plant and carabid beetle communities in an Irish oak woodland with a nearby conifer plantation and clearfelled site , 1998 .

[21]  C. Margules,et al.  Effects of habitat fragmentation on carabid beetles: experimental evidence , 1998 .

[22]  P. Legendre,et al.  SPECIES ASSEMBLAGES AND INDICATOR SPECIES:THE NEED FOR A FLEXIBLE ASYMMETRICAL APPROACH , 1997 .

[23]  K. Hůrka Carabidae of the Czech and Slovak Republics. , 1996 .

[24]  J. Butterfield,et al.  Carabid beetle communities as indicators of conservation potential in upland forests , 1995 .

[25]  J. Niemelä,et al.  Distribution of forest dwelling carabids (Coleoptera): spatial scale and the concept of communities , 1994 .

[26]  Jari Niemelä,et al.  Effects of Clear-Cut Harvesting on Boreal Ground-Beetle Assemblages (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in Western Canada , 1993 .

[27]  M. Baguette,et al.  Effects of spruce plantations on carabid beetles in southern Belgium , 1993, Pedobiologia.

[28]  S. Rushton,et al.  Classification and prediction of grassland habitats using ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) , 1992 .

[29]  M. Gilpin,et al.  20. Theoretical Issues in Conservation Biology , 1989 .

[30]  J. W. Thomas,et al.  Ecological Uses of Vertebrate Indicator Species: A Critique , 1988 .

[31]  R. Lenski EFFECTS OF FOREST CUTTING ON TWO CARABUS SPECIES: EVIDENCE FOR COMPETITION FOR FOOD' , 1982 .

[32]  H. Thiele Carabid Beetles in Their Environments: A Study on Habitat Selection by Adaptations in Physiology and Behaviour , 1977 .

[33]  A. Jiménez‐Valverde,et al.  The history of endemic Iberian ground beetle description (Insecta, Coleoptera, Carabidae): which species were described first? , 2007 .

[34]  H. Jactel,et al.  A Test of the Biodiversity-Stability Theory: Meta-analysis of Tree Species Diversity Effects on Insect Pest Infestations, and Re-examination of Responsible Factors , 2005 .

[35]  Z. Elek,et al.  Diversity and composition of carabids during a forestry cycle , 2004, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[36]  Ter Braak,et al.  Canoco reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user''s guide: software for canonical community ord , 2002 .

[37]  C.J.F. ter Braak,et al.  CANOCO Reference Manual and User's Guide to Canoco for Windows: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (Version 4) , 1998 .

[38]  G. Lövei,et al.  Ecology and behavior of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). , 1996, Annual review of entomology.

[39]  J. Niemelä,et al.  Northern forestry and carabids: the case for concern about old-growth species , 1996 .

[40]  L. Penev Large-scale variation in carabid assemblages, with special reference to the local fauna concept , 1996 .

[41]  G. Lovei The Ecology and Behavior of Ground Beetles , 1996 .

[42]  Amelia Ortubay Fuentes Relación clima-vegetación en la Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco , 1995 .

[43]  J. Niemelä,et al.  Carabid beetles in fragments of coniferous forest , 1993 .

[44]  K. Gaston,et al.  Logging and boreal ground-beetle assemblages on two continents: implications for conservation. , 1993 .

[45]  J. Niemelä,et al.  Habitat associations of carabid beetles in fields and forests on the Åland Islands, SW Finland , 1992 .

[46]  H. Mader,et al.  Animal habitat isolation by roads and agricultural fields , 1984 .

[47]  J. Levenson Woodlots as biogeographic islands in southeastern Wisconsin , 1981 .