Defining, validating, and increasing indices of happiness among people with profound multiple disabilities.

In this study we attempted to operationalize, measure, and increase happiness among people with profound disabilities. Happiness indices were defined and observed among 5 individuals. Validation measures indicated that (a) increases in happiness indices were observed when individuals were presented with most preferred stimuli relative to least preferred stimuli, (b) increases in unhappiness indices were observed when they were presented with least preferred relative to most preferred stimuli, and (c) practitioner ratings of participant happiness coincided with observed indices. Subsequently, classroom staff increased happiness indices through presentation and contingent withdrawal of activities. Results suggested that a behavioral approach can enhance happiness as one aspect of quality of life among people with profound disabilities. Research directions are offered that focus on using a behavioral approach to investigate other private events that are important among people with disabilities.

[1]  R. Koegel,et al.  Motivating autistic children through stimulus variation. , 1980, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[2]  D. Reid,et al.  A comprehensive evaluation of reinforcer identification processes for persons with profound multiple handicaps. , 1991, Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis.

[3]  J. Eichinger,et al.  A Validation of Program Quality Indicators in Educational Services for Students with Severe Disabilities , 1987 .

[4]  Nirbhay N. Singh,et al.  An evaluation of gentle teaching and visual screening in the reduction of stereotypy. , 1989, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[5]  G. Dunlap,et al.  The influence of task variation and maintenance tasks on the learning and affect of autistic children. , 1984, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[6]  R. Koegel,et al.  Motivating autistic children. , 1979, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[7]  Deborah A. Curtis,et al.  Evaluating the Effects of Placement of Students with Severe Disabilities in General Education versus Special Classes , 1994 .

[8]  R. Liberman,et al.  The Behavior Observation Instrument: a method of direct observation for program evaluation. , 1978, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[9]  B. Iwata,et al.  Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals. , 1985, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[10]  D. Reid,et al.  Identifying reinforcers for persons with profound handicaps: staff opinion versus systematic assessment of preferences. , 1988, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[11]  D. Reid,et al.  Teaching persons with profound multiple handicaps: a review of the effects of behavioral research. , 1991, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[12]  W. Sailor,et al.  Progress in Educating Students with the Most Severe Disabilities: Is There Any? , 1988 .

[13]  J. Bailey Wanted: A rational search for the limiting conditions of habilitation in the retarded , 1981 .

[14]  C. Kennedy,et al.  Functional analysis and treatment of eye poking. , 1995, Journal of applied behavior analysis.