Transformations in technical communication pedagogy: engineering, writing, and the ABET Engineering Criteria 2000

Recent transformations in engineering education accreditation have shifted emphasis away from simple counting of required courses to a focus on the documentation of student learning outcomes. The Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology's (ABET) Engineering Criteria 2000 (EC 2000) demands that engineering programs show evidence of eleven skills in their students. Only five of these skills relate to a student's technical abilities. The remaining six define what have been called "soft" skills, and it is this shift in emphasis that will have a significant impact on technical communication programs and pedagogy. In essence, EC 2000 has redefined both who is responsible for developing students' communication skills and for documenting evidence of student learning outcomes. Given the changes at the accreditation level, transformations within technical communication departments that serve engineering programs are inevitable. These changes offer problems as well as benefits for technical communication faculty.

[1]  Johndan Johnson-Eilola Relocating the Value of Work: Technical Communication in a Post-Industrial Age , 1996 .

[2]  Sibylle Gruber,et al.  Writing4practice in engineering courses: Implementation and assessment approaches , 1999 .

[3]  Dorothy A. Winsor,et al.  Writing Like an Engineer: A Rhetorical Education , 1996 .

[4]  C. G. Masi Re-engineering engineering education , 1995 .

[5]  Nancy W. Coppola,et al.  Setting the discourse community: Tasks and assessment for the new technical communication service course , 1999 .

[6]  Peter J. Denning,et al.  Educating a new engineer , 1992, CACM.

[7]  K. Walker,et al.  Using Genre Theory to Teach Students Engineering Lab Report Writing , 1999 .

[8]  Kathleen Blake Yancey,et al.  Situating Portfolios: Four Perspectives , 1997 .

[9]  Barbara M. Olds,et al.  Four Effective Writing Strategies for Engineering Classes , 1999 .

[10]  Jack Bushneil A Contrary View of the Technical Writing Classroom: Notes Toward Future Discussion. , 1999 .

[11]  J. R. Dixon New goals for engineering education , 1991 .

[12]  Gary B. Randolph,et al.  Collaborative Learning in the Classroom: A Writing Across the Curriculum Approach , 2000 .

[13]  B. Shwom,et al.  Engineering Design and Communication: A Foundational Course for Freshmen , 1999 .

[14]  L. G. Kryder Mentors, models and clients: using the professional engineering community to identify and teach engineering genres , 1999 .

[15]  Carolyn Plumb,et al.  Using portfolios to evaluate service courses as part of an engineering writing program , 1999 .

[16]  Glenn J. Broadhead,et al.  Addressing Multiple Goals for Engineering Writing: The Role of Course-Specific Websites , 1999 .