A biomechanical analysis of four sprint start positions.

The sprint starts of 12 skilled collegiate sprinter/hurdlers were filmed for four different sprint start conditions. Ground reaction forces were collected for the first step out of the blocks and velocities through a 2-m speed trap immediately following the first support phase were recorded. The subjects employed their preferred right-left leg placement in the blocks, while the anterior-posterior spacing of the front block with respect to the starting line and the amount of forward lean in the set position were varied. Four positions were constructed that accounted for anthropometric differences. The four positions consisted of combinations of two arm orientations (forward lean and perpendicular to ground) and two front block to starting line distances (bunched and elongated). Kinematic data were reduced to provide center of mass position and velocity measures and analyzed for critical periods throughout the starting action. Selected critical events from the first step kinetic records were also analyzed. The results indicated that the elongated starting positions resulted in greater horizontal displacement, greater propelling impulse, increased first step toe-off velocity, and greater average velocity through a 2-m speed trap. Arm orientation effects were less well defined. Forward lean tended to result in greater vertical velocity at block clearance and horizontal velocity at first step toe-off, whereas perpendicular arm positioning resulted in greater 2-m speed trap velocity.

[1]  Malcolm Stock,et al.  Influence of Various Track Starting Positions on Speed , 1962 .

[2]  S. Sepic,et al.  Strength of isometric and isokinetic contractions: knee muscles of men aged 20 to 86. , 1980, Physical therapy.

[3]  Ralph Mann,et al.  Kinematic Analysis of Olympic Sprint Performance: Men's 200 Meters , 1985 .

[4]  D. Winter Biomechanics of Human Movement , 1980 .

[5]  J J Knapik,et al.  Isometric, isotonic, and isokinetic torque variations in four muscle groups through a range of joint motion. , 1983, Physical therapy.

[6]  S. Sepic,et al.  Maximum isometric knee flexor and extensor muscle contractions: normal patterns of torque versus time. , 1977, Physical therapy.

[7]  M Nissan,et al.  Review of some basic assumptions in knee biomechanics. , 1980, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  J. Hamill,et al.  Variations in ground reaction force parameters at different running speeds , 1983 .

[9]  F. B. Blader The Analysis of Movements and Forces in the Sprint Start , 1969 .

[10]  Peter O. Sigerseth,et al.  Effect of Foot Spacing on Velocity in Sprints , 1962 .

[11]  F. B. Blader,et al.  The Mechanics of the Sprint Start , 1971 .

[12]  J. Kistler A Study of the Distribution of the Force Exerted Upon the Blocks in Starting the Sprint from Various Starting Positions , 1934 .

[13]  T. Blaine Hoshizaki,et al.  Optimization of an Asymmetrical Motor Skill: Sprint Start , 1986 .

[14]  R C Menely,et al.  Effectiveness of four track starting positions on acceleration. , 1968, Research quarterly.

[15]  Franklin M. Henry,et al.  Force-Time Characteristics of the Sprint Start , 1952 .

[16]  A. D. Dickinson,et al.  The Effect of Foot Spacing on the Starting Time and Speed in Sprinting and the Relation of Physical Measurements to Foot Spacing , 1934 .

[17]  M. Gessaroli,et al.  The Analysis of Repeated Measures Designs Involving Multiple Dependent Variables , 1987 .

[18]  Winter Da Camera speeds for normal and pathological gait analyses. , 1982 .

[19]  Michael L. Davidson Univariate versus multivariate tests in repeated-measures experiments. , 1972 .