A protocol to assess the seismic criticality of existing small concrete dams

Abstract Dams are critical infrastructures whose failure would entail serious consequences for community safety. Although large dams represent the most dangerous items, small size dams may be critical, as a large number of these constructions are built in the proximity to inhabited zones. Earthquake is one of the hazards that may affect an existing dam. To assess safety and plan investments, dam owners need to create prioritisation sequences of interventions through a protocol considering technical, political and societal aspects. It is presented herein a specific procedure, based on a multi-criteria analysis with a rapid screening survey of the infrastructures, which addresses to classify the seismic criticality of dams considering the effects (in terms of loss of life and property) of a failure scenario subsequent to an earthquake. A protocol is used to define a prioritisation of interventions that mitigate the seismic risk. It has been applied to a group of 9 small concrete dams and 17 fixed weirs, built from 1920 to 1990 in Aosta Valley (Italy). As a result, about 30% of the existing dams, which are more vulnerable than fixed weirs, shows the highest level of seismic criticality, and needs to be retrofitted in accordance with the current standards.

[1]  Ximiao Jiang,et al.  Field-observed phenomena of seismic liquefaction and subsidence during the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake in China , 2010 .

[2]  Wei Zhou,et al.  Integrated duration effects on seismic performance of concrete gravity dams using linear and nonlinear evaluation methods , 2015 .

[3]  Barbara Frigo,et al.  A simplified method for estimating Newmark displacements of mountain reservoirs , 2017 .

[4]  Ignacio Escuder-Bueno,et al.  The suitability of risk reduction indicators to inform dam safety management , 2016 .

[5]  A. Kappos,et al.  Vulnerability assessment and earthquake damage scenarios of the building stock of Potenza (Southern Italy) using Italian and Greek methodologies , 2006 .

[6]  Luc Taerwe,et al.  fib model code for concrete structures 2010 , 2013 .

[7]  Peng Yan,et al.  A general definition of integrated strong motion duration and its effect on seismic demands of concrete gravity dams , 2016 .

[8]  D. Breysse,et al.  Nondestructive evaluation of concrete strength: An historical review and a new perspective by combining NDT methods , 2012 .

[9]  Renato Giannini,et al.  Assessment of concrete strength combining direct and NDT measures via Bayesian inference , 2014 .

[10]  Matthias Ehrgott,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys , 2005 .

[11]  K. Bergmeister,et al.  Structural assessment and reliability analysis for existing engineering structures, theoretical background , 2009 .

[12]  A. Senzanje,et al.  The development of a risk of failure evaluation tool for small dams in Mzingwane Catchment, Zimbabwe , 2007 .

[13]  C. Q. Zhu,et al.  Safety Assessment of Antiliquefaction Performance of a Constructed Reservoir Embankment. I: Experimental Assessment , 2017 .

[14]  Manolis Papadrakakis,et al.  Vulnerability analysis of large concrete dams using the continuum strong discontinuity approach and neural networks , 2008 .

[15]  L. Mouvet,et al.  Structural safety of dams, according to the new Swiss legislation , 2001 .

[16]  Bernardino Chiaia,et al.  Retrofit and conservation of historical concrete buildings in Turin (Italy) , 2015 .

[17]  Youcef Bouafia,et al.  Response of concrete gravity dam by damage model under seismic excitation , 2015 .

[18]  Fabrizio Barpi,et al.  The cohesive frictional crack model applied to the analysis of the dam-foundation joint , 2010 .

[19]  H. K. Hilsdorf,et al.  Code-type formulation of fracture mechanics concepts for concrete , 1991 .

[20]  Angelo Masi,et al.  Estimation of the actual in-place concrete strength in assessing existing RC structures , 2006 .

[21]  Yu Huang,et al.  Probability density evolution method for seismic liquefaction performance analysis of earth dam , 2017 .