High‐resolution multi‐parameter DNA flow cytometry enables detection of tumour and stromal cell subpopulations in paraffin‐embedded tissues

The accuracy of DNA ploidy measurements of paraffin‐embedded tissues is limited by the lack of resolution and the inability to identify the DNA diploid population unequivocally in bimodal DNA histograms. A multi‐parameter DNA flow cytometric method has been developed that enables the simultaneous detection of neoplastic and stromal cells in samples from dewaxed 50 µm sections or 2 mm diameter punches of archival tissue blocks. The method combines heat pretreatment in sodium citrate buffer and subsequent enzymatic dissociation with a collagenase/dispase mixture. Cells were simultaneously stained for keratin (FITC), vimentin (R‐PE), and DNA (PI) before flow cytometric analysis. The method was applied to 12 paraffin‐embedded cervical carcinomas and four colorectal carcinomas. In all cervical cancers, distinct keratin‐positive and vimentin‐positive cell populations were observed. While the exclusive vimentin‐positive cell fractions always yielded unimodal DNA content distributions, bimodal distributions were observed for the keratin‐positive cell fractions in nine cervical carcinomas, whereas one cervical carcinoma showed three distinct G0G1 populations. Coefficients of variation of the G0G1 peaks ranged from 1.70% to 4.79%. Average background, aggregate, and debris values were 14.7% (vimentin‐positive fraction) and 33.8% (keratin‐positive fraction). Flow sorting confirmed that the exclusively vimentin‐positive cell fractions represent different normal stromal and infiltrate cells that can serve as an internal ploidy reference enabling discrimination between DNA hypo‐diploid and DNA hyper‐diploid tumour cell subpopulations. The neoplastic origin of the keratin–vimentin co‐expressing cells from two cervical carcinomas was confirmed by genotyping of flow‐sorted samples revealing loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of 6p. This improved method obviates the need for fresh/frozen tumour tissue for high‐resolution DNA ploidy measurements and enables the isolation of highly purified tumour subpopulations for subsequent genotyping. Copyright © 2005 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  P. Hogendoorn,et al.  Multiparameter DNA flow‐sorting demonstrates diploidy and SDHD wild‐type gene retention in the sustentacular cell compartment of head and neck paragangliomas: chief cells are the only neoplastic component , 2004, The Journal of pathology.

[2]  E. Jordanova,et al.  Flow cytometric sorting of paraffin-embedded tumor tissues considerably improves molecular genetic analysis. , 2003, American journal of clinical pathology.

[3]  P. Hogendoorn,et al.  Aberrant Chemokine Receptor Expression and Chemokine Production by Langerhans Cells Underlies the Pathogenesis of Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis , 2003, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[4]  C. Cornelisse,et al.  Flow cytometry of human solid tumours: clinical and research applications , 2002 .

[5]  G. Fleuren,et al.  Software compensation improves the analysis of heterogeneous tumor samples stained for multiparameter DNA flow cytometry. , 2002, Journal of immunological methods.

[6]  G. Clark,et al.  Optimizing flow cytometric DNA ploidy and S-phase fraction as independent prognostic markers for node-negative breast cancer specimens. , 2001, Cytometry.

[7]  C. Mathew,et al.  Loss of heterozygosity mapping at chromosome arm 16q in 712 breast tumors reveals factors that influence delineation of candidate regions. , 2001, Cancer research.

[8]  G. Fleuren,et al.  Distinction between HLA class I-positive and -negative cervical tumor subpopulations by multiparameter DNA flow cytometry. , 2000, Cytometry.

[9]  G. Fleuren,et al.  Multiple Genetic Alterations Cause Frequent and Heterogeneous Human Histocompatibility Leukocyte Antigen Class I Loss in Cervical Cancer , 2000, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[10]  G. Fleuren,et al.  Four-color multiparameter DNA flow cytometric method to study phenotypic intratumor heterogeneity in cervical cancer. , 2000, Cytometry.

[11]  G. Fleuren,et al.  Different profiles of allelic losses in cervical carcinoma cases in Surinam and the Netherlands , 1999, Cancer.

[12]  M. Fernö,et al.  Prognostic implications of various models for calculation of S-phase fraction in 259 patients with soft tissue sarcoma , 1999, British Journal of Cancer.

[13]  M. Nap,et al.  Heat pretreatment increases resolution in DNA flow cytometry of paraffin-embedded tumor tissue. , 1999, Cytometry.

[14]  G. Fleuren,et al.  One-tube triple staining method for flow cytometric analysis of DNA ploidy and phenotypic heterogeneity of human solid tumors using single laser excitation. , 1996, Cytometry.

[15]  J. Foidart,et al.  VIMENTIN EXPRESSION IN CERVICAL CARCINOMAS: ASSOCIATION WITH INVASIVE AND MIGRATORY POTENTIAL , 1996, The Journal of pathology.

[16]  P. Rabinovitch,et al.  Cytokeratin labeling of breast cancer cells extracted from paraffin-embedded tissue for bivariate flow cytometric analysis. , 1996, Cytometry.

[17]  J. McCoy,et al.  Method to make paraffin-embedded breast and lymph tissue mimic fresh tissue in DNA analysis. , 1996, Cytometry.

[18]  J. McCoy,et al.  Reversing the effect of formalin on the binding of propidium iodide to DNA. , 1994, Cytometry.

[19]  H. Gustafsson,et al.  Application of dual parameter analysis in flow cytometric DNA measurements of paraffin-embedded samples. , 1994, Journal of oral pathology & medicine : official publication of the International Association of Oral Pathologists and the American Academy of Oral Pathology.

[20]  G. Fleuren,et al.  Simultaneous measurement of two cellular antigens and DNA using fluorescein-isothiocyanate, R-phycoerythrin, and propidium iodide on a standard FACScan. , 1994, Cytometry.

[21]  B. Tribukait,et al.  Improved method for release of cell nuclei from paraffin-embedded cell material of squamous cell carcinomas. , 1993, Cytometry.

[22]  T. Okagaki Variation in reference cells for DNA analysis of paraffin-embedded tissue. , 1992, American journal of clinical pathology.

[23]  R. Zarbo,et al.  Comparison of eight modifications of Hedley's method for flow cytometric DNA ploidy analysis of paraffin-embedded tissue. , 1992, American journal of clinical pathology.

[24]  R. O’Toole,et al.  Technical and statistical improvements for flow cytometric DNA analysis of paraffin-embedded tissue. , 1988, Cytometry.

[25]  D. Ruiter,et al.  Coexpression of intermediate filament polypeptides in human fetal and adult tissues. , 1987, Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology.

[26]  N. Azumi,et al.  The distribution of vimentin and keratin in epithelial and nonepithelial neoplasms. A comprehensive immunohistochemical study on formalin- and alcohol-fixed tumors. , 1987, American journal of clinical pathology.

[27]  I. Taylor,et al.  Application of DNA flow cytometry to paraffin-embedded archival material for the study of aneuploidy and its clinical significance. , 1985, Cytometry.

[28]  I W Taylor,et al.  Method for analysis of cellular DNA content of paraffin-embedded pathological material using flow cytometry. , 1983, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[29]  R. Kimmig,et al.  DNA cell-cycle analysis of cervical cancer by flow cytometry using simultaneous cytokeratin labelling for identification of tumour cells , 2005, Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.

[30]  C. Cox,et al.  Guidelines for the implementation of clinical DNA cytometry , 2004, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[31]  C. Cox,et al.  Guidelines for implementation of clinical DNA cytometry. International Society for Analytical Cytology. , 1993, Cytometry.

[32]  M. Melamed,et al.  Effect of section thickness on quality of flow cytometric DNA content determinations in paraffin-embedded tissues. , 1986, Cytometry.

[33]  F. Bosman,et al.  Flow cytometric determination of DNA ploidy level in nuclei isolated from paraffin-embedded tissue. , 1985, Cytometry.