Site choices in recreational demand: a matter of utility maximization or regret minimization?

This paper compares the Random Regret Minimization and the Random Utility Maximization models for determining recreational choice. The Random Regret approach is based on the idea that, when choosing, individuals aim to minimize their regret – regret being defined as what one experiences when a non-chosen alternative in a choice set performs better than a chosen one in relation to one or more attributes. The Random Regret paradigm, recently developed in transport economics, presents a tractable, regret-based alternative to the dominant choice paradigm based on Random Utility. Using data from a travel cost study exploring factors that influence kayakers’ site-choice decisions in the Republic of Ireland, we estimate both the traditional Random Utility multinomial logit model (RU-MNL) and the Random Regret multinomial logit model (RR-MNL) to gain more insights into site choice decisions. We further explore whether choices are driven by a utility maximization or a regret minimization paradigm by running a binary logit model to examine the likelihood of the two decision choice paradigms using site visits and respondents characteristics as explanatory variables. In addition to being one of the first studies to apply the RR-MNL to an environmental good, this paper also represents the first application of the RR-MNL to compute the Logsum to test and strengthen conclusions on welfare impacts of potential alternative policy scenarios.

[1]  O. R. Burt,et al.  Estimation of Net Social Benefits from Outdoor Recreation , 1971 .

[2]  T. Arentze,et al.  A Random Regret-Minimization model of travel choice , 2008 .

[3]  John Quiggin,et al.  Regret theory with general choice sets , 1994 .

[4]  D. Bromley.  Handbook of environmental economics , 1995 .

[5]  G. Parsons.  The Travel Cost Model , 2003 .

[6]  Todd Sarver,et al.  ANTICIPATING REGRET : WHY FEWER OPTIONS MAY BE BETTER , 2008 .

[7]  J. Herriges,et al.  Valuing Recreation and the Environment , 1999 .

[8]  David E. Bell,et al.  Regret in Decision Making under Uncertainty , 1982, Oper. Res..

[9]  Agha Faisal,et al.  Modelling travellers' choice of information sources and of mode , 2010 .

[10]  Marcel Zeelenberg,et al.  A Theory of Regret Regulation 1.0 , 2007 .

[11]  W. Michael Hanemann,et al.  Estimating the Value of Water Quality Improvements in a Recreational Demand Framework , 1987 .

[12]  C. Manski.  The structure of random utility models , 1977 .

[13]  Caspar G. Chorus,et al.  Modeling politicians' preferences for road pricing policies: A regret-based and utilitarian perspective , 2011 .

[14]  R. Sugden,et al.  A Rationale for Preference Reversal , 1983 .

[15]  Caspar G. Chorus,et al.  Random Regret Minimization: An Overview of Model Properties and Empirical Evidence , 2012 .

[16]  Marco Boeri,et al.  Random Regret Minimization: Exploration of a New Choice Model for Environmental and Resource Economics , 2011 .

[17]  Michel Bierlaire,et al.  BIOGEME: a free package for the estimation of discrete choice models , 2003 .

[18]  Gary Koop,et al.  Go climb a mountain: an application of recreation demand modelling to rock climbing in Scotland , 2008 .

[19]  Andrew H. Trice,et al.  Measurement of Recreation Benefits , 1958 .

[20]  L. Thurstone.  A law of comparative judgment. , 1994 .

[21]  Joffre Swait,et al.  A NON-COMPENSATORY CHOICE MODEL INCORPORATING ATTRIBUTE CUTOFFS , 2001 .

[22]  V. Smith,et al.  Recreation Demand Models , 2005 .

[23]  C. Chorus.  A New Model of Random Regret Minimization , 2010, European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research.

[24]  Timothy C. Haab,et al.  Valuing Environmental and Natural Resources: The Econometrics of Non-Market Valuation , 2002 .

[25]  Thomas C. Brown,et al.  A primer on nonmarket valuation , 2003 .

[26]  Oded Netzer,et al.  Alternative Models for Capturing the Compromise Effect , 2004 .

[27]  Caspar G. Chorus,et al.  Spatial Choice: A Matter of Utility or Regret? , 2009 .

[28]  D. McFadden.  Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .

[29]  Caspar G. Chorus,et al.  Responses to Transit Information among Car-drivers: Regret-based Models and Simulations , 2006 .

[30]  Binsheng Li.  The measurement of environmental and resource values: Theory and methods: A Myrick Freeman III Resources for the Future, Washington, DC, 1994, 515 pp , 1994 .

[31]  Joffre Swait,et al.  The Akaike Likelihood Ratio Index , 1986, Transp. Sci..

[32]  Marcel Zeelenberg,et al.  The use of crying over spilled milk: a note on the rationality and functionality of regret , 1999 .

[33]  W. Greene,et al.  Random regret minimization or random utility maximization: An exploratory analysis in the context of automobile fuel choice , 2013 .

[34]  K. McConnell,et al.  Valuing Environmental and Natural Resources , 2002 .

[35]  Mark D. Uncles,et al.  Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand , 1987 .

[36]  A. Tversky,et al.  Choice in Context: Tradeoff Contrast and Extremeness Aversion , 1992 .

[37]  Jessie Y. C. Chen,et al.  Task Factors and Compromise Effect in Consumer Choice , 2009 .

[38]  Ta Theo Arentze,et al.  Parametric Action Decision Trees: Incorporating Continuous Attribute Variables Into Rule-Based Models of Discrete Choice , 2007 .

[39]  John M. Rose,et al.  Selecting a date: a matter of regret and compromises , 2013 .

[40]  Riccardo Scarpa,et al.  Effects on Welfare Measures of Alternative Means of Accounting for Preference Heterogeneity in Recreational Demand Models , 2008 .

[41]  J. Ford,et al.  Process tracing methods: Contributions, problems, and neglected research questions , 1989 .

[42]  R. Dhar,et al.  The Effect of Forced Choice on Choice , 2003 .

[43]  Edward R. Morey,et al.  A Repeated Nested-Logit Model of Atlantic Salmon Fishing , 1993 .

[44]  J. O'Doherty,et al.  Regret and its avoidance: a neuroimaging study of choice behavior , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[45]  Donggen Wang,et al.  Modeling traveler choice behavior using the concepts of relative utility and relative interest , 2004 .

[46]  I. Simonson,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF ANTICIPATING REGRET AND RESPONSIBILITY ON PURCHASE DECISIONS , 1992 .

[47]  N. Hanley,et al.  Up the Proverbial Creek without a Paddle: Accounting for Variable Participant Skill Levels in Recreational Demand Modelling , 2007 .

[48]  Daniel J. Phaneuf,et al.  Estimation and Welfare Calculations in a Generalized Corner Solution Model with an Application to Recreation Demand , 2000, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[49]  R. Sugden,et al.  Regret Theory: An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty Review of Economic Studies , 1982 .

[50]  Riccardo Scarpa,et al.  Modelling Determinants of Participation, Number of Trips and Site Choice for Outdoor Recreation in Protected Areas , 2008 .

[51]  Caspar G. Chorus,et al.  Logsums for utility-maximizers and regret-minimizers, and their relation with desirability and satisfaction , 2012 .

[52]  I. Simonson,et al.  Choice Based on Reasons: The Case of Attraction and Compromise Effects , 1989 .

[53]  A. Freeman,et al.  The measurement of environmental and resource values , 1992 .

[54]  G. Parsons,et al.  A Demand Theory for Number of Trips in a Random Utility Model of Recreation , 1995 .

[55]  Kenneth E. McConnell,et al.  Environmental and Resource Valuation with Revealed Preferences: A Theoretical Guide to Empirical Models , 2006 .

[56]  Caspar G. Chorus,et al.  Modeling experienced accessibility for utility-maximizers and regret-minimizers , 2011 .

[57]  S. Cosslett,et al.  Environmental Quality Preference and Benefit Estimation in Multinomial Probit Models: A Simulation Approach , 1998 .

[58]  Terry Connolly,et al.  Regret in cancer-related decisions. , 2005, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[59]  Marion Clawson,et al.  Methods of Measuring the Demand for and Value of Outdoor Recreation. Marion Clawson. Resources for the Future, Inc., 1145 Nineteenth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 1959. 36p. 50c , 1972 .