The Social Contagion of Generosity

Why do people help strangers when there is a low probability that help will be directly reciprocated or socially rewarded? A possible explanation is that these acts are contagious: those who receive or observe help from a stranger become more likely to help others. We test two mechanisms for the social contagion of generosity among strangers: generalized reciprocity (a recipient of generosity is more likely to pay it forward) and third-party influence (an observer of generous behavior is more likely to emulate it). We use an online experiment with randomized trials to test the two hypothesized mechanisms and their interaction by manipulating the extent to which participants receive and observe help. Results show that receiving help can increase the willingness to be generous towards others, but observing help can have the opposite effect, especially among those who have not received help. These results suggest that observing widespread generosity may attenuate the belief that one’s own efforts are needed.

[1]  Nicholas A. Christakis,et al.  Cooperative behavior cascades in human social networks , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Carl A. Kallgren,et al.  A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. , 1990 .

[3]  Siddharth Suri,et al.  Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[4]  Vincent Buskens,et al.  Coordination on egalitarian Networks from Asymmetric Relations in a Social Game of chicken , 2013, Adv. Complex Syst..

[5]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Cooperation and Contagion in Web-Based, Networked Public Goods Experiments , 2010, SECO.

[6]  Kipling D. Williams,et al.  PROCESSES Social Loafing: A Meta-Analytic Review and Theoretical Integration , 2022 .

[7]  Sebastian Bonhoeffer,et al.  Evolution of cooperation by generalized reciprocity , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  P. Ekeh,et al.  Social Exchange Theory: The Two Traditions. , 1975 .

[9]  B. Latané,et al.  Bystander intervention in emergencies: diffusion of responsibility. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  R. Cialdini.  Influence: Science and Practice , 1984 .

[11]  Bill Tomlinson,et al.  Who are the crowdworkers?: shifting demographics in mechanical turk , 2010, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[12]  A. Diekmann.  Volunteer's Dilemma , 1985 .

[13]  S. Bikhchandani,et al.  You have printed the following article : A Theory of Fads , Fashion , Custom , and Cultural Change as Informational Cascades , 2007 .

[14]  L. Stanca.  Measuring Indirect Reciprocity: Whose Back Do We Scratch? , 2009 .

[15]  M. Deutsch,et al.  A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgement. , 1955, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[16]  David G. Rand,et al.  The online laboratory: conducting experiments in a real labor market , 2010, ArXiv.

[17]  D. Watts,et al.  Social Influence, Binary Decisions and Collective Dynamics , 2008 .

[18]  B. Malinowski.  Kula: The Circulating Exchange Of Valuables In The Archipelagoes Of Eastern New Guinea , 1920 .

[19]  P. Richerson,et al.  The evolution of indirect reciprocity , 1989 .

[20]  Mark S. Granovetter,et al.  Threshold models of diffusion and collective behavior , 1983 .

[21]  D. DeSteno,et al.  Gratitude and Prosocial Behavior , 2006, Psychological science.

[22]  T. Valente.  Social network thresholds in the diffusion of innovations , 1996 .

[23]  Matthew J. Salganik,et al.  Experimental Study of Inequality and Unpredictability in an Artificial Cultural Market , 2006, Science.

[24]  I. N. A. C. I. J. H. Fowler.  Book Review: Connected: The surprising power of our social networks and how they shape our lives. , 2009 .

[25]  G. Marwell,et al.  A Theory of the Critical Mass. I. Interdependence, Group Heterogeneity, and the Production of Collective Action , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[26]  Panagiotis G. Ipeirotis,et al.  Running Experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk , 2010, Judgment and Decision Making.

[27]  Karen S. Cook,et al.  Generalized Exchange and Social Dilemmas , 1993 .

[28]  David G. Rand,et al.  Dynamic social networks promote cooperation in experiments with humans , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  Roland Soong,et al.  Threshold models of interpersonal effects in consumer demand , 1986 .

[30]  E. Uehara,et al.  Dual Exchange Theory, Social Networks, and Informal Social Support , 1990, American Journal of Sociology.

[31]  David R. Schaefer,et al.  Building Solidarity through Generalized Exchange: A Theory of Reciprocity1 , 2007, American Journal of Sociology.

[32]  B. Greiner,et al.  Indirect Reciprocity in Cyclical Networks - An Experimental Study - , 2005 .

[33]  Cameron Marlow,et al.  A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization , 2012, Nature.

[34]  David G. Rand,et al.  Human cooperation , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[35]  L. Putterman,et al.  Reciprocity in a two-part dictator game , 2004 .

[36]  Sébastien Roch,et al.  Upstream reciprocity and the evolution of gratitude , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[37]  David G. Rand,et al.  Contagion of Cooperation in Static and Fluid Social Networks , 2013, PloS one.

[38]  Jennifer L. Berdahl,et al.  Suckers or saviors? Consistent contributors in social dilemmas. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[39]  G. Marwell,et al.  A Theory of the Critical Mass , 1991 .