Retinal changes after fluocinolone acetonide implant (ILUVIEN®) for DME: SD-OCT imaging assessment using ESASO classification.

INTRODUCTION A detailed understanding of the anatomical and structural changes occurring in the retina following intravitreal fluocinolone acetonide implantation may help improve the management and prognosis of persistent or recurrent diabetic macular edema (DME). METHODS Overall, 45 eyes (from 35 patients) with refractory center-involved DME received an intravitreal fluocinolone acetonide implant. They were monitored at baseline and at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months for best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central foveal thickness (CFT), and the seven retinal parameters used in the classification of diabetic maculopathy recently developed at the European School for Advanced Studies in Ophthalmology (ESASO). RESULTS Within 6 months of implantation, significant improvements were evident in BCVA, CFT, maculopathy stage, and the percentage of eyes with: intraretinal cysts; CFT > 30% above the upper normal value; and disrupted or absent ellipsoid zone (EZ) and/or external limiting membrane (ELM). Significant improvements were still maintained at 36 months post-implantation. At month 36, early treatment with the implant (i.e., after < 6 previous intravitreal injections for DME) trended toward being more effective than later treatment in improving BCVA, CFT, maculopathy stage, and the percentage of eyes with CFT > 30% above the upper normal value. However, statistical significance was not achieved. CONCLUSION In persistent or recurrent DME, fluocinolone acetonide implantation can be effective in improving maculopathy stage and reducing the percentage of eyes with: intraretinal cysts; CFT > 30% above the upper normal value; and disrupted or absent EZ and/or ELM. It can also increase BCVA and reduce CFT.

[1]  M. V. Cicinelli,et al.  Factors associated with the response to fluocinolone acetonide 0.19  mg in diabetic macular oedema evaluated as the area-under-the-curve , 2022, Eye.

[2]  J. Beirão,et al.  Changes in Ganglion Cell Layer Thickness after Treatment with the 0.2 µg/day Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant in Vitrectomized and Nonvitrectomized Eyes with Diabetic Macular Edema , 2022, Ophthalmic Research.

[3]  Qinghua Qiu,et al.  Hyperreflective Foci and Subretinal Fluid Are Potential Imaging Biomarkers to Evaluate Anti-VEGF Effect in Diabetic Macular Edema , 2021, Frontiers in Physiology.

[4]  A. Ho,et al.  Fluctuations in central subfield thickness associated with worse visual outcomes in patients with diabetic macular edema in clinical trial setting. , 2021, American journal of ophthalmology.

[5]  Lixia Lu,et al.  Anti-VEGF therapy prevents Müller intracellular edema by decreasing VEGF-A in diabetic retinopathy , 2021, Eye and Vision.

[6]  A. Meduri,et al.  Optical Coherence Tomography Predictors of Favorable Functional Response in Naïve Diabetic Macular Edema Eyes Treated with Dexamethasone Implants as a First-Line Agent , 2021, Journal of Ophthalmology.

[7]  A. Maugeri,et al.  Fluocinolone acetonide vitreous insert for chronic diabetic macular oedema: a systematic review with meta-analysis of real-world experience , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[8]  N. Pfeiffer,et al.  Switching to intravitreal fluocinolone acetonide implant for refractory diabetic macular edema: 12- and 24-month results , 2021, European journal of ophthalmology.

[9]  J. Beirão,et al.  Optical Coherence Tomography Biomarkers: Vitreous Status Influence in Outcomes for Diabetic Macular Edema Therapy with 0.19-mg Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant , 2021, Ophthalmic Research.

[10]  S. Nicoară,et al.  Optical Coherence Tomography (Angiography) Biomarkers in the Assessment and Monitoring of Diabetic Macular Edema , 2020, Journal of diabetes research.

[11]  M. V. Cicinelli,et al.  Persistent or Recurrent Diabetic Macular Edema after Fluocinolone Acetonide 0.19 mg Implant: risk factors and management. , 2020, American journal of ophthalmology.

[12]  J. Chhablani,et al.  Disorganization of retinal inner layers as a biomarker in patients with diabetic macular oedema treated with dexamethasone implant , 2020, Acta ophthalmologica.

[13]  M. Falcão,et al.  A New Approach for Diabetic Macular Edema Treatment: Review of Clinical Practice Results with 0.19 mg Fluocinolone Acetonide Intravitreal Implant Including Vitrectomized Eyes , 2020, Current Ophthalmology Reports.

[14]  U. Schmidt-Erfurth,et al.  An optical coherence tomography-based grading of diabetic maculopathy proposed by an international expert panel: The European School for Advanced Studies in Ophthalmology classification , 2019, European journal of ophthalmology.

[15]  B. Seitz,et al.  Three-year results from the Retro-IDEAL study: Real-world data from diabetic macular edema (DME) patients treated with ILUVIEN® (0.19 mg fluocinolone acetonide implant) , 2019, European journal of ophthalmology.

[16]  Chris A. Johnson,et al.  Disorganization of Retinal Inner Layers (DRIL) and Neuroretinal Dysfunction in Early Diabetic Retinopathy , 2018, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[17]  U. Schmidt-Erfurth,et al.  Correlation of Central Retinal Thickness and Visual Acuity in Diabetic Macular Edema. , 2018, JAMA ophthalmology.

[18]  A. Ebneter,et al.  Repeated Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant for the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Oedema Unresponsive to Anti-VEGF Therapy: Outcome and Predictive SD-OCT Features , 2018, Ophthalmologica.

[19]  Usha Chakravarthy,et al.  Disorganization of Inner Retina and Outer Retinal Morphology in Diabetic Macular Edema , 2018, JAMA ophthalmology.

[20]  J. Coelho,et al.  Fluocinolone Acetonide Intravitreal Implant 190 μg (ILUVIEN®) in Vitrectomized versus Nonvitrectomized Eyes for the Treatment of Chronic Diabetic Macular Edema , 2017, Ophthalmic Research.

[21]  S. Kabanarou,et al.  Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant in Diabetic Macular Edema: Real-Life Data from a Prospective Study and Predictive Factors for Visual Outcome , 2017, Diabetes Therapy.

[22]  J. Chae,et al.  Association Between Hyperreflective Dots on Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography in Macular Edema and Response to Treatment. , 2017, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[23]  Christian Simader,et al.  Predictive imaging biomarkers relevant for functional and anatomical outcomes during ranibizumab therapy of diabetic macular oedema , 2017, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[24]  S. Vujosevic,et al.  Diabetic Macular Edema With and Without Subfoveal Neuroretinal Detachment: Two Different Morphologic and Functional Entities. , 2017, American journal of ophthalmology.

[25]  A. Erginay,et al.  Efficacy of 0.2 μg/day fluocinolone acetonide implant (ILUVIEN) in eyes with diabetic macular edema and prior vitrectomy , 2017, Eye.

[26]  Arup Das,et al.  Diabetic Macular Edema: Pathophysiology and Novel Therapeutic Targets. , 2015, Ophthalmology.

[27]  Jennifer K. Sun,et al.  Neural Retinal Disorganization as a Robust Marker of Visual Acuity in Current and Resolved Diabetic Macular Edema , 2015, Diabetes.

[28]  P. Campochiaro,et al.  Sustained delivery fluocinolone acetonide vitreous inserts provide benefit for at least 3 years in patients with diabetic macular edema. , 2012, Ophthalmology.

[29]  Dominic McHugh,et al.  Optical coherence tomography may be used to predict visual acuity in patients with macular edema. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[30]  W. Freeman,et al.  The association between percent disruption of the photoreceptor inner segment-outer segment junction and visual acuity in diabetic macular edema. , 2010, American journal of ophthalmology.

[31]  Vikram S Brar,et al.  Normative data for macular thickness by high-definition spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (spectralis). , 2009, American journal of ophthalmology.

[32]  Ali Erginay,et al.  Optical coherence tomography features during the evolution of serous retinal detachment in patients with diabetic macular edema. , 2008, American journal of ophthalmology.