As users grow more savvy: experiences with an asynchronous distance learning tool

Over a three-year period we designed and redesigned interfaces to a conceptually simple multimedia annotation tool called MRAS, the Microsoft research annotation system. We expected MRAS to be widely useful in education settings with little or no modification. In a series of deployments we encountered a surprising range of specific requirements. These included context- and content-specific needs. We ultimately had to shift from an application focus to a platform focus, from a single general-purpose tool to a toolkit to support asynchronous group interaction, with which task-specific applications could be built. Software that can be widely used with little or no modification has advantages for producers and consumers, but our experience suggests that as computer users become more aware of the flexibility of software, general purpose shrinkwrap software may fade away. Requests for MRAS from educators who would likely encounter similar problems suggests that these difficulties are not predictable. We discuss implications for designers, developers, and users.

[1]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Developing a reflective model of collaborative systems , 1995, TCHI.

[2]  David Bargeron,et al.  Annotations for Streaming Video on the Web: System Design and Usage Studies , 1999, Comput. Networks.

[3]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Groupware and social dynamics: eight challenges for developers , 1994, CACM.

[4]  Larry Masinter,et al.  The Interlisp Programming Environment , 1981, Computer.

[5]  Wendy E. Mackay,et al.  Users and customizable software : a co-adaptive phenomenon , 1990 .

[6]  Gerhard Fischer,et al.  End-user modifiability in design environments , 1990, CHI '90.

[7]  David Bargeron,et al.  Asynchronous collaboration around multimedia and its application to on-demand training , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[8]  Henk Sol,et al.  Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences , 1997, HICSS 2015.

[9]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Fostering Engagement in Asynchronous Learning through Collaborative Multimedia Annotation , 2001, INTERACT.

[10]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  Teaching and learning as multimedia authoring: the classroom 2000 project , 1997, MULTIMEDIA '96.

[11]  Lars Mathiassen,et al.  Three Levels of End-User Tailoring: Customization, Integration, and Extension , 2003 .

[12]  Steven P. Rei Connecting Tools Using Message Passing in the Field Environment , 1990 .

[13]  Gerhard Fischer,et al.  “Why is a raven like a writing desk?”: lessons in interface consistency and analogical reasoning from two cognitive architectures , 1994, CHI Conference Companion.