Quadriceps tendon grafts does not cause patients to have inferior subjective outcome after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction than do hamstring grafts: a 2-year prospective randomised controlled trial

Objective We performed a randomised controlled trial (RCT) in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction (ACLR) using either quadriceps tendon graft (QT) or semitendinosus/gracilis hamstring (STG) graft. We compared subjective outcome (primary outcome) and knee stability, donor site morbidity and function (secondary outcomes). Methods From 2013 to 2015, we included 99 adults with isolated ACL injuries in the RCT. Fifty patients were randomised to QT grafts and 49 to STG grafts and followed for 2 years. Patient evaluated outcomes were performed by subjective International Knee Documentation Committee, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Kujala and Tegner activity scores. Knee laxity was measured with a KT-1000 arthrometer. Donor site morbidity was evaluated by the ‘donor site-related functional problems following ACLR score’. One-leg hop test tested limp strength symmetry. Results At 2-year follow-up, there was no difference between the two graft groups regarding subjective patient outcome, knee stability and reoperations. Also, at 2 years, donor site symptoms were present in 27% of patients in the QT group and 50% of patients in the STG group. The donor site morbidity score was 14 and 22 for the QT and STG, respectively. Hop test demonstrated lower limp symmetry for QT graft than STG graft of 91% and 97% respectively. Conclusion QT graft for ACLR did not result in inferior subjective outcome compared with STG graft. However, QT graft was associated with lower donor site morbidity than STG grafts but resulted in more quadriceps muscle strength deficiency than hamstring grafts. Both graft types had similar knee stability outcome. Trial registration number NCT02173483.

[1]  V. Musahl,et al.  No difference between full thickness and partial thickness quadriceps tendon autografts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review , 2018, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[2]  G. Edman,et al.  Risk Factors for Abnormal Anteroposterior Knee Laxity After Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. , 2018, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[3]  V. Musahl,et al.  Quadriceps tendon autograft for arthroscopic knee ligament reconstruction: use it now, use it often , 2018, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[4]  L. Engebretsen,et al.  Patient demographic and surgical characteristics in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a description of registries from six countries , 2018, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[5]  C. Fink,et al.  There is no difference between quadriceps- and hamstring tendon autografts in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a 2-year patient-reported outcome study , 2018, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[6]  A. Hardy,et al.  Complications following harvesting of patellar tendon or hamstring tendon grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Systematic review of literature. , 2017, Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR.

[7]  M. Inacio,et al.  Increased Risk of Revision After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Soft Tissue Allografts Compared With Autografts: Graft Processing and Time Make a Difference , 2017, The American journal of sports medicine.

[8]  C. Buescu,et al.  Pain level after ACL reconstruction: A comparative study between free quadriceps tendon and hamstring tendons autografts , 2017, Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica.

[9]  T. Hewett,et al.  Hamstring Autograft versus Patellar Tendon Autograft for ACL Reconstruction: Is There a Difference in Graft Failure Rate? A Meta-analysis of 47,613 Patients , 2017, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  S. Lee,et al.  Outcomes of Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2016, The American journal of sports medicine.

[11]  L. Engebretsen,et al.  Lower Risk of Revision With Patellar Tendon Autografts Compared With Hamstring Autografts , 2014, The American journal of sports medicine.

[12]  C. Fink,et al.  Minimally invasive harvest of a quadriceps tendon graft with or without a bone block. , 2014, Arthroscopy techniques.

[13]  M. Lind,et al.  Is quadriceps tendon a better graft choice than patellar tendon? a prospective randomized study. , 2014, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[14]  M. Milankov,et al.  Fracture of the patella after the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. , 2012, Medicinski pregled.

[15]  C. Mazel,et al.  Painful patellofemoral instability secondary to peroperative patellar fracture during bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft harvesting for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. , 2012, Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR.

[16]  Freddie H. Fu,et al.  Anatomical evaluation of the rectus femoris tendon and its related structures , 2012, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[17]  M. Hagströmer,et al.  Donor-site-related functional problems following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: development of a self-administered questionnaire , 2012, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[18]  J. Fulkerson,et al.  Anatomic guidelines for harvesting a quadriceps free tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. , 2012, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[19]  M. Lind,et al.  Incidence and Outcome After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2012, The American journal of sports medicine.

[20]  K. Dainty,et al.  Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults. , 2011, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[21]  N. Pujol,et al.  Mini-invasive technique for bone patellar tendon bone harvesting: its superiority in reducing anterior knee pain following ACL reconstruction , 2011, Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine.

[22]  W. Shelton,et al.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using quadriceps tendon autograft: intermediate-term outcome. , 2009, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[23]  Chih-Hwa Chen,et al.  Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadriceps tendon autograft: clinical outcome in 4–7 years , 2006, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[24]  Jesper Augustsson,et al.  A test battery for evaluating hop performance in patients with an ACL injury and patients who have undergone ACL reconstruction , 2006, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[25]  A. Georgoulis,et al.  The extensor mechanism of the knee joint: an anatomical study , 2006, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[26]  J. Richmond,et al.  Development and Validation of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form * , 2001, The American journal of sports medicine.

[27]  J. Karlsson,et al.  The localization of the infrapatellar nerves in the anterior knee region with special emphasis on central third patellar tendon harvest: a dissection study on cadaver and amputated specimens. , 1999, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[28]  C. Ekdahl,et al.  Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) ‐ validation of a Swedish version , 1998, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[29]  S. Koskinen,et al.  Scoring of patellofemoral disorders. , 1993, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[30]  A. Anderson,et al.  Instrumented evaluation of knee laxity: A comparison of five arthrometers , 1992, The American journal of sports medicine.

[31]  J. Lysholm,et al.  Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. , 1985, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[32]  J. Xerogeanes,et al.  Biomechanical Comparison of Quadriceps and Patellar Tendon Grafts in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. , 2016, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[33]  Lars Engebretsen,et al.  Patient demographics and surgical characteristics in ACL revision: a comparison of French, Norwegian, and North American cohorts , 2014, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.