Near real time confocal microscopy of cultured amelanotic cells: sources of signal, contrast agents and limits of contrast.

The use of high resolution, in vivo confocal imaging for noninvasive assessment of tissue pathology may offer a clinically important adjunct to standard histopathological techniques. To augment the present understanding of both the capabilities and limitations of in vivo confocal imaging, we investigated cellular sources of image contrast in amelanotic tissues, how contrast can be enhanced with external agents and how contrast is degraded by the scattering of overlying cells. A high-resolution reflected light confocal microscope was constructed and used to obtain images of various types of unstained amelanotic cells in suspension in real time before and after the addition of contrast agents. Reflectance images were compared to phase contrast images and electron micrographs to identify morphology visible with real time reflected light confocal microscopy. Mechanisms which decrease image contrast, including interference effects and scattering in overlying layers of cells, were considered. In amelanotic epithelial cells, fluctuations in the nuclear index of refraction provide signal which can be imaged even under several overlying cell layers. Acetic acid is an external contrast agent which can enhance this nuclear backscattering. Image contrast is degraded by the presence of multiple scattering in overlying cell layers. The degradation of image contrast by cell scattering depends on the scattering phase function; in vitro models which use polystyrene microspheres to approximate tissue underestimate the actual degradation caused by cell scattering. The loss in contrast can be explained using a finite difference time domain model of cellular scattering. We conclude that near real time reflected light confocal microscopy can be used to study cell morphology in vivo. Contrast degradation due to overlying tissue is a concern and cannot adequately be modeled using conventional tissue phantoms; however, acetic acid may be used to substantially increase intrinsic contrast, allowing imaging at significant depths despite distortion from overlying layers. © 1998 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers.

[1]  H Stepp,et al.  Fluorescence imaging and spectroscopy of 5-aminolevulinic acid induced protoporphyrin IX for the detection of neoplastic lesions in the oral cavity. , 1996, American journal of surgery.

[2]  Wolfgang Rudolph,et al.  Comparative study of confocal and heterodyne microscopy for imaging through scattering media , 1996 .

[3]  T. Wilson,et al.  The Role of the Pinhole in Confocal Imaging Systems , 1990 .

[4]  W. Webb,et al.  Background rejection and signal-to-noise optimization in confocal and alternative fluorescence microscopes. , 1994, Applied optics.

[5]  R. Barer Refractometry and interferometry of living cells. , 1957, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[6]  P. Corcuff,et al.  In vivo confocal microscopy of human skin: a new design for cosmetology and dermatology. , 2006, Scanning.

[7]  P. Schmitt,et al.  Human Anatomy and Physiology, ed 2 , 1977 .

[8]  Andrew K. Dunn,et al.  Three-dimensional computation of light scattering from cells , 1996 .

[9]  P Corcuff,et al.  In vivo spatio-temporal visualization of the human skin by real-time confocal microscopy. , 1994, Scanning.

[10]  R. Webb,et al.  In vivo confocal scanning laser microscopy of human skin: melanin provides strong contrast. , 1995, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[11]  H. D. Cavanagh,et al.  In vivo, real-time confocal imaging. , 1991, Journal of electron microscopy technique.

[12]  A J Welch,et al.  Penetration depth limits of in vivo confocal reflectance imaging. , 1998, Applied optics.

[13]  W. Petroll,et al.  Comparison of in vivo and ex vivo cellular structure in rabbit eyes detected by tandem scanning microscopy , 1992, Journal of microscopy.

[14]  A F Gmitro,et al.  Rapid observation of unfixed, unstained human skin biopsy specimens with confocal microscopy and visualization. , 1997, Journal of biomedical optics.

[15]  A J Welch,et al.  Sources of contrast in confocal reflectance imaging. , 1996, Applied optics.

[16]  A. Kriete,et al.  Image Contrast in Confocal Light Microscopy , 1990 .

[17]  D. Cosgrove The breast , 1999, European Radiology.

[18]  B R Masters,et al.  Real-time scanning slit confocal microscopy of the in vivo human cornea. , 1994, Applied optics.

[19]  Tony Wilson Real-Time White Light Confocal Microscopy , 1999 .

[20]  P. F. Mullaney,et al.  Differential light scattering from spherical mammalian cells. , 1974, Biophysical journal.