Adaptive hybrid robotic system for rehabilitation of reaching movement after a brain injury: a usability study

BackgroundBrain injury survivors often present upper-limb motor impairment affecting the execution of functional activities such as reaching. A currently active research line seeking to maximize upper-limb motor recovery after a brain injury, deals with the combined use of functional electrical stimulation (FES) and mechanical supporting devices, in what has been previously termed hybrid robotic systems. This study evaluates from the technical and clinical perspectives the usability of an integrated hybrid robotic system for the rehabilitation of upper-limb reaching movements after a brain lesion affecting the motor function.MethodsThe presented system is comprised of four main components. The hybrid assistance is given by a passive exoskeleton to support the arm weight against gravity and a functional electrical stimulation device to assist the execution of the reaching task. The feedback error learning (FEL) controller was implemented to adjust the intensity of the electrical stimuli delivered on target muscles according to the performance of the users. This control strategy is based on a proportional-integral-derivative feedback controller and an artificial neural network as the feedforward controller. Two experiments were carried out in this evaluation. First, the technical viability and the performance of the implemented FEL controller was evaluated in healthy subjects (N = 12). Second, a small cohort of patients with a brain injury (N = 4) participated in two experimental session to evaluate the system performance. Also, the overall satisfaction and emotional response of the users after they used the system was assessed.ResultsIn the experiment with healthy subjects, a significant reduction of the tracking error was found during the execution of reaching movements. In the experiment with patients, a decreasing trend of the error trajectory was found together with an increasing trend in the task performance as the movement was repeated. Brain injury patients expressed a great acceptance in using the system as a rehabilitation tool.ConclusionsThe study demonstrates the technical feasibility of using the hybrid robotic system for reaching rehabilitation. Patients’ reports on the received intervention reveal a great satisfaction and acceptance of the hybrid robotic system.Trial registrationRetrospective trial registration in ISRCTN Register with study ID ISRCTN12843006.

[1]  Vincent S. Huang,et al.  Robotic neurorehabilitation: a computational motor learning perspective , 2009, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[2]  Dejan B Popović,et al.  Advances in functional electrical stimulation (FES). , 2014, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[3]  C. Lynch,et al.  Functional Electrical Stimulation , 2017, IEEE Control Systems.

[4]  W. T. Ang,et al.  Functional electrical stimulation in rehabilitation engineering: a survey , 2007, i-CREATe '07.

[5]  Jon D. Morris Observations: SAM: The Self-Assessment Manikin An Efficient Cross-Cultural Measurement Of Emotional Response 1 , 1995 .

[6]  Wenwei Yu,et al.  Implementing Feedback Error Learning for FES control , 2011, 2011 4th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Informatics (BMEI).

[7]  F. Mahoney,et al.  FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX. , 2018, Maryland state medical journal.

[8]  A. G. Feldman,et al.  Interjoint coordination dynamics during reaching in stroke , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  Jose Gonzalez-Vargas,et al.  Feedback Error Learning Controller for Functional Electrical Stimulation Assistance in a Hybrid Robotic System for Reaching Rehabilitation , 2016, European journal of translational myology.

[10]  F. Naghdy,et al.  Robot-assisted post-stroke motion rehabilitation in upper extremities: a survey , 2017 .

[11]  H. Krebs,et al.  Effects of Robot-Assisted Therapy on Upper Limb Recovery After Stroke: A Systematic Review , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[12]  Eric Rogers,et al.  Phase-lead iterative learning control algorithms for functional electrical stimulation-based stroke rehabilitation , 2011 .

[13]  Eric Rogers,et al.  The application of precisely controlled functional electrical stimulation to the shoulder, elbow and wrist for upper limb stroke rehabilitation: a feasibility study , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[14]  Mustafa Kutlu,et al.  FES-based upper-limb stroke rehabilitation with advanced sensing and control , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[15]  Eric Rogers,et al.  Functional electrical stimulation mediated by iterative learning control and 3D robotics reduces motor impairment in chronic stroke , 2011, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[16]  E. Rogers,et al.  Design & control of a 3D stroke rehabilitation platform , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[17]  P. Langhorne,et al.  Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review , 2009, The Lancet Neurology.

[18]  Diego Torricelli,et al.  Hybrid robotic systems for upper limb rehabilitation after stroke: A review. , 2016, Medical engineering & physics.

[19]  C. Wolfson,et al.  Reliability, validity, and applicability of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0) for adults with multiple sclerosis , 2002, Disability and rehabilitation.

[20]  Takashi Watanabe,et al.  An Approach to Applying Feedback Error Learning for Functional Electrical Stimulation Controller: Computer Simulation Tests of Wrist Joint Control , 2010, Adv. Artif. Neural Syst..

[21]  R. Carson,et al.  Training of Reaching in Stroke Survivors With Severe and Chronic Upper Limb Paresis Using a Novel Nonrobotic Device: A Randomized Clinical Trial , 2008, Stroke.

[22]  Anis Sahbani,et al.  Robotic Exoskeletons: A Perspective for the Rehabilitation of Arm Coordination in Stroke Patients , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[23]  Eric Rogers,et al.  Stroke participants' perceptions of robotic and electrical stimulation therapy: a new approach , 2011, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[24]  T. Flash,et al.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[25]  G. Demeurisse,et al.  [Motor evaluation in vascular hemiplegia]. , 1979, Bruxelles medical.

[26]  Christopher T. Freeman,et al.  Upper Limb Electrical Stimulation Using Input-Output Linearization and Iterative Learning Control , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[27]  Stephen R. Marsland,et al.  Machine Learning - An Algorithmic Perspective , 2009, Chapman and Hall / CRC machine learning and pattern recognition series.

[28]  E. Rogers,et al.  Iterative Learning Control in Health Care: Electrical Stimulation and Robotic-Assisted Upper-Limb Stroke Rehabilitation , 2012, IEEE Control Systems.

[29]  N. Hoshimiya,et al.  Joint angle control by FES using a feedback error learning controller , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[30]  E. Rogers,et al.  Feasibility of Iterative Learning Control Mediated by Functional Electrical Stimulation for Reaching After Stroke , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[31]  C.G. Burgar,et al.  Evidence for improved muscle activation patterns after retraining of reaching movements with the MIME robotic system in subjects with post-stroke hemiparesis , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[32]  Takashi Watanabe,et al.  A study on feedback error learning controller for functional electrical stimulation: generation of target trajectories by minimum jerk model. , 2011, Artificial organs.

[33]  Mitsuo Kawato,et al.  Feedback-Error-Learning Neural Network for Supervised Motor Learning , 1990 .

[34]  C. Lang,et al.  Dose and timing in neurorehabilitation: prescribing motor therapy after stroke. , 2015, Current opinion in neurology.

[35]  Nicola A. Maffiuletti,et al.  Physiological and methodological considerations for the use of neuromuscular electrical stimulation , 2010, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[36]  Jer-Junn Luh,et al.  Clinical effects of combined bilateral arm training with functional electrical stimulation in patients with stroke , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[37]  C. Ekdahl,et al.  Motivation as a predictor of changes in quality of life and working ability in multidisciplinary rehabilitation , 2000, Disability and rehabilitation.

[38]  H. Dickson,et al.  Interrater reliability of the 7-level functional independence measure (FIM) , 1995, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.