Analysis of flow effects in echo‐planar imaging

The effects on the phase of spins moving during echo‐planar imaging (EPI) acquisition were studied. Standard single‐shot and interleaved multishot blipped EPI acquisitions were considered, assuming either high gradient strength and slew rates or standard gradient strength and slew rates. A spiral k‐space trajectory was also considered. Flow components in the section‐select and phase‐ and frequency‐encoding directions were analyzed separately. While the effect of flow in the section‐select direction is identical to that in a standard two‐dimensional Fourier transform (2DFT) acquisition, flow in the phase‐ or frequency‐encoding directions can have substantial effects on the image, different from that in 2DFT imaging. The magnitude of these effects, which include displacement, distortion, and/or ghosting of vascular structures, is analyzed and predicted for a given velocity and direction of flow, the specific acquisition sequence, and the strength and slew rate of the gradients. For example, 50‐cm/sec flow along the phase‐encoding direction can cause a blurring of 1.25 cm full width at half maximum for blipped EPI with high‐strength gradients, assuming a 40‐cm field of view and 64 × 64 matrix.

[1]  P Mansfield,et al.  Rapid biomedical imaging by NMR. , 1981, The British journal of radiology.

[2]  R. Rzedzian,et al.  Instant images of the body by magnetic resonance , 1987, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  C. Dumoulin,et al.  Magnetic resonance angiography. , 1986, Radiology.

[4]  J. Duerk,et al.  Motion artifact suppression technique (MAST) for MR imaging. , 1987, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[5]  D. Firmin,et al.  Measurement of Flow with NMR Imaging Using a Gradient Pulse and Phase Difference Technique , 1984, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[6]  J N Lee,et al.  Rapid MR imaging of blood flow with a phase-sensitive, limited-flip-angle, gradient recalled pulse sequence: preliminary experience. , 1990, Radiology.

[7]  N J Pelc,et al.  Normal flow patterns of intracranial and spinal cerebrospinal fluid defined with phase-contrast cine MR imaging. , 1991, Radiology.

[8]  E M Haacke,et al.  Improving MR image quality in the presence of motion by using rephasing gradients. , 1987, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  D. Firmin,et al.  Echo‐planar high‐resolution flow velocity mapping , 1989, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  P. Joseph,et al.  A method for reducing motion induced errors in T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. , 1987, Medical physics.

[11]  D. Feinberg,et al.  Human brain motion and cerebrospinal fluid circulation demonstrated with MR velocity imaging. , 1987, Radiology.

[12]  O. Simonetti,et al.  Theoretical aspects of motion sensitivity and compensation in echo‐planar imaging , 1991, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[13]  P. R. Moran A flow velocity zeugmatographic interlace for NMR imaging in humans. , 1982, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[14]  R L Ehman,et al.  Spatial misregistration of vascular flow during MR imaging of the CNS: cause and clinical significance. , 1990, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.