Multivariate analysis of a 3D mass spectral image for examining tissue heterogeneity.

The tissue microenvironment critically influences the molecular characteristics of a tumor. However, as tumorous tissue is highly heterogeneous it may harbor various sub-populations with different microenvironments, greatly complicating the unambiguous analysis of tumor biology. Mass spectrometry imaging techniques allow for the direct analysis of tumors in the spatial context of their microenvironment. However, discovery of heterogeneous sub-populations often depends on the use of multivariate statistical methods. While this is routinely used for 2D images, multivariate statistical approaches are rarely seen in the context of 3D images. Here we present the automatic alignment of 2D images recorded by nanostructure-initiator mass spectrometry (NIMS) to reconstruct a 3D model of a mouse mammary tumor. Multivariate statistical analysis was applied to the whole 3D reconstruction at once, revealing distinct tumor regions, an observation that would not have been possible in such clarity through the analysis of isolated 2D sections. These sub-structures were confirmed by H&E and Oil Red O stains. This study shows that the combination of 3D imaging and multivariate statistics can be used to define tumor regions.

[1]  Junefredo V. Apon,et al.  Clathrate nanostructures for mass spectrometry , 2007, Nature.

[2]  R. Cooks,et al.  Three-dimensional vizualization of mouse brain by lipid analysis using ambient ionization mass spectrometry. , 2010, Angewandte Chemie.

[3]  R. Heeren,et al.  Mass spectrometric imaging for biomedical tissue analysis. , 2010, Chemical reviews.

[4]  R. Hill,et al.  The tumor microenvironment and metastatic disease , 2008, Clinical & Experimental Metastasis.

[5]  Ajay N. Jain,et al.  Genomic and transcriptional aberrations linked to breast cancer pathophysiologies. , 2006, Cancer cell.

[6]  David G. Mutch,et al.  Intra-tumor heterogeneity of MLH1 promoter methylation revealed by deep single molecule bisulfite sequencing , 2009, Nucleic acids research.

[7]  Wei Huang,et al.  Proton MR spectroscopy with choline peak as malignancy marker improves positive predictive value for breast cancer diagnosis: preliminary study. , 2006, Radiology.

[8]  M J Bissell,et al.  The importance of the microenvironment in breast cancer progression: recapitulation of mammary tumorigenesis using a unique human mammary epithelial cell model and a three-dimensional culture assay. , 1996, Biochemistry and cell biology = Biochimie et biologie cellulaire.

[9]  J. Green,et al.  Prostate and mammary adenocarcinoma in transgenic mice carrying a rat C3(1) simian virus 40 large tumor antigen fusion gene. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Mina J. Bissell,et al.  Extracellular matrix control of mammary gland morphogenesis and tumorigenesis: insights from imaging , 2008, Histochemistry and Cell Biology.

[11]  L. Cantley,et al.  Understanding the Warburg Effect: The Metabolic Requirements of Cell Proliferation , 2009, Science.

[12]  Robert Hooke,et al.  `` Direct Search'' Solution of Numerical and Statistical Problems , 1961, JACM.

[13]  E. A. Sylvestre,et al.  Self Modeling Curve Resolution , 1971 .

[14]  S. Vaidyanathan,et al.  TOF-SIMS 3D biomolecular imaging of Xenopus laevis oocytes using buckminsterfullerene (C60) primary ions. , 2007, Analytical chemistry.

[15]  Heinrich Lanfermann,et al.  Increased choline levels coincide with enhanced proliferative activity of human neuroepithelial brain tumors , 2002, NMR in biomedicine.

[16]  S. Hamamoto,et al.  CELL CONTACTS IN THE MOUSE MAMMARY GLAND , 1973, The Journal of cell biology.

[17]  Malcolm R Clench,et al.  Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation mass spectrometry imaging of lipids in rat brain tissue with integrated unsupervised and supervised multivariant statistical analysis. , 2008, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.

[18]  L. McDonnell,et al.  Automated imaging MS: Toward high throughput imaging mass spectrometry. , 2010, Journal of proteomics.

[19]  O. Warburg,et al.  THE METABOLISM OF TUMORS IN THE BODY , 1927, The Journal of general physiology.

[20]  A. Svatoš Mass spectrometric imaging of small molecules. , 2010, Trends in biotechnology.

[21]  Ariel Y Deutch,et al.  Imaging mass spectrometry of proteins and peptides: 3D volume reconstruction , 2008, Nature Methods.

[22]  O. Warburg [Origin of cancer cells]. , 1956, Oncologia.

[23]  Sandra Rauser,et al.  MALDI imaging mass spectrometry for direct tissue analysis: a new frontier for molecular histology , 2008, Histochemistry and Cell Biology.

[24]  Joe W. Gray,et al.  HER2 signaling pathway activation and response of breast cancer cells to HER2-targeting agents is dependent strongly on the 3D microenvironment , 2010, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[25]  Wen-Lin Kuo,et al.  A collection of breast cancer cell lines for the study of functionally distinct cancer subtypes. , 2006, Cancer cell.

[26]  Donald J. Johann,et al.  Cancer and the tumor microenvironment: a review of an essential relationship , 2009, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[27]  K. Polyak,et al.  Tumor heterogeneity: causes and consequences. , 2010, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[28]  M. Oudkerk,et al.  1H chemical shift imaging characterization of human brain tumor and edema , 2002, European Radiology.