Defining Appropriate Inter -Aircraft Separation Requirements

In order to maintain minimum separation standards between two aircraft, proper avoidance maneuvers must be initiated before their relative separation reaches the minimum separation due to aircraft dynamics, controller and pilot response delays, and other delays. This paper presents the concept and a systematic procedure for the calc ulation of required action thresholds, which is the time or distance when the conflict resolution process must begin in order to maintain minimum separation requirements. It sets an upper boundary or latest alert time for the conflict detection and resolu tion process. In this paper, 5 main segments in the process of conflict resolut ion are identified and modeled: s tate information acquisition, comprehension and decision, communication, pilot response, and aircraft maneuver. Then, the models of the five segments are brought together in a simulation where a robust aircraft maneuver time can be calculated through extensive simulations. The models and simulation are then used to determine the required action threshold. Three example scenarios are studied to illustrate the determinations of appropriate required action thresholds.

[1]  Yiyuan Zhao,et al.  Trajectory Synthesis for Air Traffic Automation , 1997 .

[2]  Steven D. Thompson Terminal Area Separation Standards: Historical Development, Current Standards, and Processes for Change, , 1997 .

[3]  James K. Kuchar,et al.  Survey of conflict detection and resolution modeling methods , 1997 .

[4]  C. Bergh,et al.  TRACON Aircraft Arrival Planning and Optimization Through Spatial Constraint Satisfaction , 1995 .

[5]  Heinz Erzberger,et al.  Design and evaluation of an air traffic control Final Approach Spacing Tool , 1991 .

[6]  Heinz Erzberger Design principles and algorithms for automated air traffic management , 1995 .

[7]  Heinz Erzberger,et al.  Design of Center-TRACON Automation System , 1993 .

[8]  G. J. Bakker,et al.  Conflict probability and incrossing probability in air traffic management , 2002, Proceedings of the 41st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 2002..

[9]  Heinz Erzberger,et al.  Conflict Probability Estimation for Free Flight , 1997 .

[10]  Tom G. Reynolds,et al.  ANALYSIS OF SEPARATION MINIMA USING A SURVEILLANCE STATE VECTOR APPROACH , 2000 .

[11]  Joseph Walsh,et al.  TCAS IN THE 1990s , 1991 .

[12]  Rachelle L. Ennis,et al.  A Formal Approach to the Analysis of Aircraft Protected Zone , 2004 .

[13]  Ronald A. Hess,et al.  A Qualitative Model of Human Interaction with Complex Dynamic Systems , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[14]  Heinz Erzberger,et al.  The Center-Tracon Automation System: Simulation and Field Testing , 1995 .

[15]  D. W. Burgess,et al.  TCAS: maneuvering aircraft in the horizontal plane , 1995 .

[16]  Weiping Li,et al.  Applied Nonlinear Control , 1991 .

[17]  N. A. Spencer,et al.  Development and operation of the Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System (TCAS) , 1989, Proc. IEEE.

[18]  Yiyuan Zhao,et al.  Required Ranges for Conflict Resolutions in Air Traffic Management , 2001 .

[19]  Paul Milgram,et al.  Combining Time and Intensity Effects in Assessing Operator Information-Processing Load , 1997, Hum. Factors.