Gestalt grouping effects on tactile information processing: when touching hands override spatial proximity

Using a tactile variant of the negative-priming paradigm, we analyzed the influence of Gestalt grouping on the ability of participants to ignore distracting tactile information. The distance between participants’ hands, to which the target and distractor stimuli were simultaneously delivered, was varied (near/touching hands vs. hands far apart). In addition, the influence of touching hands was controlled, as participants wore gloves and their hands were blocked from vision by a cover. The magnitude of the tactile negative-priming effect was modulated by the interaction between hand separation and whether or not gloves were worn. When the hands were touching, negative priming emerged only while wearing gloves that prevented direct skin-to-skin contact. In contrast, when the separation between the participants’ hands was larger, negative priming emerged only when gloves were not worn. This pattern of results is interpreted in terms of the competing influences of two interacting Gestalt principles—namely, connectedness and proximity—on the processing of tactile distractors.

[1]  H. Pashler The Psychology of Attention , 1997 .

[2]  Laurence R Harris,et al.  Multimodal Ternus: Visual, Tactile, and Visuo — Tactile Grouping in Apparent Motion , 2007, Perception.

[3]  D. Meyer,et al.  Attention and Performance XIV , 1973 .

[4]  Charles Spence,et al.  Response Requirements Modulate Tactile Spatial Congruency Evects for Example, given That the Body Can Adopt a Variety of Diverent Postures, a Tactile Sensation Arising , 2022 .

[5]  H. Branch Coslett,et al.  Bare hands and attention: evidence for a tactile representation of the human body , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[6]  S. Tipper,et al.  A model of inhibitory mechanisms in selective attention. , 1994 .

[7]  Albert S. Bregman,et al.  The Auditory Scene. (Book Reviews: Auditory Scene Analysis. The Perceptual Organization of Sound.) , 1990 .

[8]  Charles Spence,et al.  To what extent do Gestalt grouping principles influence tactile perception? , 2011, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  S. Soto-Faraco,et al.  Changing Reference Frames during the Encoding of Tactile Events , 2008, Current Biology.

[10]  S. Tipper,et al.  Inhibitory Mechanisms of Neural and Cognitive Control: Applications to Selective Attention and Sequential Action , 1996, Brain and Cognition.

[11]  C. Spence,et al.  Visual capture of apparent limb position influences tactile temporal order judgments , 2005, Neuroscience Letters.

[12]  J. Wagemans,et al.  Perceptual grouping in haptic search: the influence of proximity, similarity, and good continuation. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  Roger N. Shepard,et al.  Constraints common to apparent motion in visual, tactile, and auditory space. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  A. Allport Attention and control: have we been asking the wrong questions? A critical review of twenty-five years , 1993 .

[15]  Charles Spence,et al.  In Touch with the Future , 2015, ITS.

[16]  J. R. Pomerantz,et al.  A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: II. Conceptual and theoretical foundations. , 2012, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  M Behrmann,et al.  Attention accesses multiple reference frames: evidence from visual neglect. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  C. Ehrenfels,et al.  Foundations of Gestalt Theory , 1988 .

[19]  E. Fox Negative priming from ignored distractors in visual selection: A review , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[20]  W. Trammell Neill,et al.  Episodic retrieval in negative priming and repetition priming. , 1997 .

[21]  J. Duncan Selective attention and the organization of visual information. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[22]  Christian Frings,et al.  Crossmodal congruency effects based on stimulus identity , 2010, Brain Research.

[23]  O. Reiser,et al.  Principles Of Gestalt Psychology , 1936 .

[24]  T. Carr,et al.  Inhibitory Processes in Attention, Memory and Language , 1994 .

[25]  C. Spence,et al.  When seeing doesn't matter: assessing the after-effects of tactile distractor processing in the blind and the sighted. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  A. Allport,et al.  Selection for action: Some behavioral and neurophysiological considerations of attention and action , 1987 .

[27]  Regine Bader,et al.  Selection in touch: Negative priming with tactile stimuli , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[28]  S. Rose Selective attention , 1992, Nature.

[29]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Varieties of attention , 1984 .

[30]  Michael G. Reynolds,et al.  To group or not to group: an ecological consideration of the stroop effect. , 2010, Experimental psychology.

[31]  G. Baylis,et al.  Movement and visual attention: the spotlight metaphor breaks down. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  Bernhard Hommel,et al.  Intermodal event files: integrating features across vision, audition, taction, and action , 2008, Psychological research.

[33]  H. Heuer,et al.  Perspectives on Perception and Action , 1989 .

[34]  I. Rock,et al.  Perceptual organization and attention , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[35]  C. K. Ogden A Source Book Of Gestalt Psychology , 2013 .

[36]  J. Wagemans The Oxford handbook of perceptual organization , 2015 .

[37]  C. Spence,et al.  Early Vision Impairs Tactile Perception in the Blind , 2004, Current Biology.

[38]  S. Tipper Does Negative Priming Reflect Inhibitory Mechanisms? A Review and Integration of Conflicting Views , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[39]  C. Spence,et al.  Increased perceptual and conceptual processing difficulty makes the immeasurable measurable: negative priming in the absence of probe distractors. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  B. Julesz Foundations of Cyclopean Perception , 1971 .

[41]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Object-based perceptual grouping affects negative priming. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[42]  K. Jeffery,et al.  The Hippocampal and Parietal Foundations of Spatial Cognition , 1999 .

[43]  John W. Tukey,et al.  Exploratory Data Analysis. , 1979 .

[44]  R. Rafal,et al.  Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[45]  P. Wühr,et al.  Prime display offset modulates negative priming only for easy-selection tasks , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[46]  Vincent Hayward,et al.  Tactile Rivalry Demonstrated with an Ambiguous Apparent-Motion Quartet , 2008, Current Biology.

[47]  Francis McGlone,et al.  Reflexive spatial orienting of tactile attention , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[48]  C. Spence,et al.  Spatial constraints on visual-tactile cross-modal distractor congruency effects , 2004, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[49]  Keith Nesbitt,et al.  The Gestalt Principles of Similarity and Proximity Apply to Both the Haptic and Visual Grouping of Elements , 2007, AUIC.

[50]  Christian Frings,et al.  Remember the touch: tactile distractors retrieve previous responses to targets , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[51]  Y. Yeh,et al.  Probe distractors can influence negative priming by perceptual grouping , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[52]  E Fox,et al.  Perceptual grouping and visual selective attention , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[53]  L. Thompson,et al.  Effects of senescence on the temporal resolution of somesthetic stimuli presented to one hand or both. , 1968, Journal of gerontology.

[54]  P. Haggard,et al.  The brain’s fingers and hands , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[55]  M. Wertheimer,et al.  A source book of Gestalt psychology. , 1939 .

[56]  J. O'Regan,et al.  Solving the "real" mysteries of visual perception: the world as an outside memory. , 1992, Canadian journal of psychology.

[57]  S. Tipper The Negative Priming Effect: Inhibitory Priming by Ignored Objects , 1985, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[58]  M. Wertheimer Laws of organization in perceptual forms. , 1938 .

[59]  W. Köhler Gestalt psychology , 1967 .

[60]  Jon Driver,et al.  Parallel detection of Kanizsa subjective figures in the human visual system , 1994, Nature.

[61]  Charles Spence,et al.  Recent developments in the study of tactile attention. , 2007, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[62]  C. Spence,et al.  Tactile selective attention and body posture: Assessing the multisensory contributions of vision and proprioception , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[63]  Charles Spence Crossmodal attention , 1998, Scholarpedia.

[64]  Helge Gillmeister,et al.  Object-guided Spatial Attention in Touch: Holding the Same Object with Both Hands Delays Attentional Selection , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[65]  S. Palmer,et al.  A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: I. Perceptual grouping and figure-ground organization. , 2012, Psychological bulletin.

[66]  Christian Frings,et al.  To be or not to be...included in an event file: integration and retrieval of distractors in stimulus-response episodes is influenced by perceptual grouping. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[67]  A. Roelofs,et al.  Role of Gestalt grouping in selective attention: Evidence from the Stroop task , 2007, Perception & psychophysics.

[68]  R. Shepard,et al.  Constraints common to apparent motion in visual, tactile, and auditory space. , 1997, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.

[69]  Jon Driver,et al.  Egocentric and object-based visual neglect , 1998 .