LoRaWAN SCHC Fragmentation Demystified

Low Power Wide Area Networks (LPWANs) have emerged as new networks for Internet of Things (IoT). LPWANs are characterized by long-range communications and low energy consumption. Furthermore, LPWAN technologies have a small data unit and do not provide a fragmentation mechanism. To enable these technologies to support IPv6 and, thus, be compliant with the IPv6 Maximum Transmission Unit (MTU) of 1280 bytes, the LPWAN Working Group (WG) of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) has defined a new framework called Static Context Header Compression (SCHC). SCHC includes Fragmentation/Reassembly (F/R) functionality for transmitting larger packet sizes than the layer 2 MTU that the underlying LPWAN technology offers and a header compression mechanism. Moreover, SCHC defines three operational modes to perform the F/R process: No-ACK, ACK-Always and ACK-on-Error. Each mode provides different reliability levels and mechanisms. In this paper, we provide an overview of the SCHC F/R modes and evaluate their trade-offs over LoRaWAN by simulations. The analyzed parameters are the total channel occupancy, goodput and total delay at the SCHC layer. The results of our analysis show that No-ACK mode is the method with lowest total channel occupancy, highest goodput and lower total delay, but lacks a reliability mechanism. ACK-Always and ACK-on-Error modes offer the same total delay, and similar total channel occupancy, whereas ACK-on-Error offers greater goodput.

[1]  Muhammad Suryanegara,et al.  The development of IoT LoRa: A performance evaluation on LoS and Non-LoS environment at 915 MHz ISM frequency , 2017, 2017 International Conference on Signals and Systems (ICSigSys).

[2]  Carles Gomez,et al.  Modeling the Energy Performance of LoRaWAN , 2017, Sensors.

[3]  Mathias Kretschmer,et al.  LoRa WanEvaluation for IoT Communications , 2018, 2018 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI).

[4]  Loutfi Nuaymi,et al.  Measurements, performance and analysis of LoRa FABIAN, a real-world implementation of LPWAN , 2016, 2016 IEEE 27th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC).

[5]  Gabriel Montenegro,et al.  IPv6 over Low-Power Wireless Personal Area Networks (6LoWPANs): Overview, Assumptions, Problem Statement, and Goals , 2007, RFC.

[6]  Pascal Thubert,et al.  RFC 4944: Per-Hop Fragmentation and Reassembly Issues , 2018, 2018 IEEE Conference on Standards for Communications and Networking (CSCN).

[7]  Dirk Pesch,et al.  LSCHC: Layered Static Context Header Compression for LPWANs , 2017, CHANTS@MOBICOM.

[8]  Jeroen Hoebeke,et al.  Using SCHC for an optimized protocol stack in multimodal LPWAN solutions , 2019, 2019 IEEE 5th World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT).

[9]  Laurent Toutain,et al.  LPWAN Static Context Header Compression (SCHC) and fragmentation for IPv6 and UDP , 2018 .

[10]  Carsten Bormann,et al.  From 6LoWPAN to 6Lo: Expanding the Universe of IPv6-Supported Technologies for the Internet of Things , 2017, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[11]  Carsten Bormann,et al.  Problem Statement and Requirements for IPv6 over Low-Power Wireless Personal Area Network (6LoWPAN) Routing , 2012, RFC.

[12]  Abed Ellatif Samhat,et al.  Implementation of SCHC in NS-3 and Comparison with 6LoWPAN , 2019, 2019 26th International Conference on Telecommunications (ICT).

[13]  Patrick Maillé,et al.  Improving LoRa Network Capacity Using Multiple Spreading Factor Configurations , 2018, 2018 25th International Conference on Telecommunications (ICT).

[14]  Pasquale Arpaia,et al.  LoRa protocol performance assessment in critical noise conditions , 2017, 2017 IEEE 3rd International Forum on Research and Technologies for Society and Industry (RTSI).

[15]  Xavier Vilajosana,et al.  An analysis of packet fragmentation impact in LPWAN , 2018, 2018 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC).

[16]  David E. Culler,et al.  Transmission of IPv6 Packets over IEEE 802.15.4 Networks , 2007, RFC.