Identification of contact allergens using the murine local lymph node assay: Comparisons with the buehler occluded patch test in guinea pigs

A murine local lymph node assay has been developed for the identification of contact sensitizing chemicals. In the present study, the performance of the local lymph node assay has been evaluated with twenty‐four coded chemicals of previously unknown skin sensitizing potential and the results compared with predictions made from concurrent occluded patch tests (Buehler tests) in guinea pigs. The data presented demonstrate that the local lymph node assay successfully identified those chemicals that were classified'as moderate or strong skin sensitizers in the Buehler test. In the present series of experiments, chemicals predicted to be mild sensitizers in the Buehler test were classified as not strong sensitizers' in the local lymph node assay. In the majority of instances, the Buehler test and local lymph node assay were in agreement with regard to the identification of non‐sensitizing chemicals. However, two chemicals that were classified as non‐sensitizers in the guinea pig test exhibited positive responses in the local lymph node assay and were predicted to be sensitizers. Some coloured chemicals resulted in obscured Buehler readings and, here, assessment was based upon histological examination of the challenge site. These compounds were examined also in the local lymph node assay and similar predictions of sensitizing potential were made.

[1]  J. M. Miller Assessment of the ability of mice fed on vitamin A supplemented diet to respond to a variety of potential contact sensitizers , 1986, Contact dermatitis.

[2]  I. Kimber,et al.  The murine local lymph node assay for identification of contact allergens: a preliminary evaluation of in situ measurement of lymphocyte proliferation , 1989, Contact dermatitis.

[3]  H. Möller Attempts to induce contact allergy to nickel in the mouse , 1984, Contact dermatitis.

[4]  W. Mitchell Sams,et al.  Allergic Contact Dermatitis in the Guinea Pig , 1971 .

[5]  S. Ben-Efraim,et al.  Successful contact sensitization to chromate in mice. , 1988, International archives of allergy and applied immunology.

[6]  I. Kimber,et al.  Development of a murine local lymph node assay for the determination of sensitizing potential , 1986 .

[7]  U. Noster,et al.  Comparison of guinea pig sensitization methods , 1976, Contact dermatitis.

[8]  E. Buehler A rationale for the selection of occlusion to induce and elicit delayed contact hypersensitivity in the guinea pig. A prospective test. , 1985, Current problems in dermatology.

[9]  E. Buehler,et al.  DELAYED CONTACT HYPERSENSITIVITY IN THE GUINEA PIG. , 1965, Archives of dermatology.

[10]  P. Thorne,et al.  Contact sensitivity by diisocyanates: potencies and cross-reactivities. , 1987, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[11]  R. Purchase,et al.  Evaluation of the sensitising potential of 4 polyamines present in technical triethylenetetramine using 2 animal species , 1988, Contact dermatitis.

[12]  S. Gad,et al.  Development and validation of an alternative dermal sensitization test: the mouse ear swelling test (MEST). , 1986, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[13]  G. Asherson,et al.  Contact and delayed hypersensitivity in the mouse. I. Active sensitization and passive transfer. , 1968, Immunology.

[14]  S. Hanada,et al.  Contact sensitivity induced in mice by methylene bisphenyl diisocyanate , 1987, Contact dermatitis.

[15]  J. Turk Cytology of the induction of hypersensitivity. , 1967, British medical bulletin.

[16]  J. Descotes Identification of Contact Allergens: The Mouse Ear Sensitization Assay , 1988 .

[17]  A. Kligman,et al.  The Identification of Contact Allergens by Animal Assay. the Guinea Pig Maximization Test , 1969 .

[18]  T. Maurer,et al.  The optimization test in the guinea pig in relation to other predictive sensitization methods. , 1980, Toxicology.