Moderator effects of attitudinal ambivalence on attitude-behaviour relationships

Attitudinal ambivalence is generally construed as existing when the same attitude object is evaluated simultaneously as both positive and negative. The present research examined the moderating role of attitudinal ambivalence (as assessed by split-semantic differential measure) on the relationship between bipolar semantic differential measures of attitude and subsequent behaviour using moderated regression analysis. In Study 1, higher levels of attitudinal ambivalence were shown to result in weaker attitude–behaviour relationships for eating a low-fat diet (N = 140) and eating 5 portions of fruit and vegetables per day (N = 142). Study 2 (N = 361) replicated this effect when also including a measure of past behaviour for eating a low-fat diet. Implications for understanding the relationship between attitudes and behaviour are discussed. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  M. Conner,et al.  Ambivalence and Attitudes , 2002 .

[2]  M. Conner,et al.  Ambivalence about health-related behaviours: an exploration in the domain of food choice. , 2001, British journal of health psychology.

[3]  Helen H. Jensen,et al.  An Evaluation of the Health Belief Model for Predicting Perceived and Actual Dietary Quality1 , 1998 .

[4]  P. Bromer.  AMBIVALENT ATTITUDES AND INFORMATION PROCESSING , 1998 .

[5]  Tina M. Lowrey,et al.  Toward an understanding of consumer ambivalence. , 1997 .

[6]  M. Diehl,et al.  Effects of Attitudinal Ambivalence on Information Processing and Attitude-Intention Consistency☆ , 1997 .

[7]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Beyond Bipolar Conceptualizations and Measures: The Case of Attitudes and Evaluative Space , 1997, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[8]  A. Walker.  Diet in the prevention of cancer: what are the chances of avoidance? , 1996, Journal of the Royal Society of Health.

[9]  Bell,et al.  Ambivalence and Persuasion: The Processing of Messages about Immigrant Groups , 1996, Journal of experimental social psychology.

[10]  J. N. Bassili.  Meta-judgmental versus operative indexes of psychological attributes: The case of measures of attitude strength. , 1996 .

[11]  R. Petty,et al.  The gradual threshold model of ambivalence: relating the positive and negative bases of attitudes to subjective ambivalence. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  E. Rimm,et al.  Vegetable, fruit, and cereal fiber intake and risk of coronary heart disease among men. , 1996, JAMA.

[13]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Attitude strength and resistance processes. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  Paul Norman,et al.  The theory of planned behaviour and exercise: an investigation into the role of prior behaviour, behavioural intentions and attitude variability , 1995 .

[15]  Russell H. Fazio,et al.  Attitudes as object-evaluation associations: Determinants, consequences, and correlates of attitude accessibility. , 1995 .

[16]  M. Zanna,et al.  Let's not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence. , 1995 .

[17]  R. Petty,et al.  Attitude strength: An overview. , 1995 .

[18]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Attitude strength, attitude structure, and resistance to change , 1995 .

[19]  Steven J. Breckler,et al.  A Comparison of Numerical Indexes for Measuring Attitude Ambivalence , 1994 .

[20]  J. Krosnick,et al.  Attitude strength: One construct or many related constructs? , 1993 .

[21]  S. Chaiken,et al.  The psychology of attitudes. , 1993 .

[22]  S. Chaiken,et al.  The generality of the automatic attitude activation effect. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  Richard Shepherd,et al.  An investigation into the relationship between perceived control, attitude variability and the consumption of two common foods , 1992 .

[24]  T. Ulbricht,et al.  Coronary heart disease: seven dietary factors , 1991, The Lancet.

[25]  S. West,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .

[26]  S. J. Kraus,et al.  Attitudes and the Prediction of Behavior: A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature , 1990 .

[27]  O. O’neill,et al.  Plural and Conflicting Values. , 1990 .

[28]  C. Osmond,et al.  Comparison of a food frequency questionnaire with a diet record. , 1989, International journal of epidemiology.

[29]  J. Cade,et al.  Nutrient sources in the English diet: quantitative data from three English towns. , 1988, International journal of epidemiology.

[30]  C. Fischler,et al.  Food, self and identity , 1988 .

[31]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  M. Moore.  Validation of the Attitude Toward Any Practice Scale Through the Use of Ambivalence as a Moderator Variable , 1980 .

[33]  S. Schwartz.  Temporal Instability as a Moderator of the Attitude-Behavior Relationship , 1978 .

[34]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[35]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[36]  M. Moore.  Ambivalence in Attitude Measurement , 1973 .

[37]  K. Kaplan.  On the ambivalence-indifference problem in attitude theory and measurement: A suggested modification of the semantic differential technique. , 1972 .

[38]  A. W. Wicker.  Attitudes Versus Actions: The Relationship of Verbal and Overt Behavioral Responses to Attitude Objects. , 1969 .