An Investigation into GHG and non‐GHG Impacts of Double Skin Façades in Office Refurbishments

The building sector is a major contributor to energy consumption, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and depletion of natural resources. In developed countries, existing buildings represent the majority of the stock, their low‐carbon refurbishment hence being one of the most sensible ways to mitigate GHG emissions and reduce environmental impacts of the construction sector. This article has investigated and established the GHG and non‐GHG life cycle impacts of several double skin facade (DSF) configurations for office refurbishments by means of a parametric comparative life cycle assessment against up‐to‐standard single skin facade (SSF) refurbishment solutions. Two different methods were used to assess both GHG emissions and other environmental impacts. Results show that if, on the one hand, most of the DSF configurations assessed actually reduce GHG emissions compared to SSFs over their life cycle — thus supporting a wider adoption of DSFs for low‐carbon refurbishments — on the other hand, there exist non‐negligible ecological and environmental impacts that the DSF generates, specifically in terms of some materials of the structure and their final disposal. Research attention is thus needed regarding the environmental impacts of the materials used for DSFs and not only in minimizing the energy consumption of the operational phase.

[1]  Stefan Olander Life Cycle Assessment in Built Environment , 2012 .

[2]  Ignacio Zabalza Bribián,et al.  Life cycle assessment in buildings: State-of-the-art and simplified LCA methodology as a complement for building certification , 2009 .

[3]  Alice Moncaster,et al.  A method and tool for ‘cradle to grave’ embodied carbon and energy impacts of UK buildings in compliance with the new TC350 standards , 2013 .

[4]  Gabriela Benveniste,et al.  Simplified tools for global warming potential evaluation: when ‘good enough’ is best , 2010 .

[5]  Gerardo Wadel,et al.  Simplified LCA in skin design: The FB720 case , 2013 .

[6]  Robert H. Crawford,et al.  Life cycle energy and greenhouse emissions analysis of wind turbines and the effect of size on energy yield , 2009 .

[7]  Ignacio Zabalza,et al.  Life cycle assessment in buildings: The ENSLIC simplified method and guidelines , 2011 .

[8]  M. Goedkoop,et al.  The Eco-indicator 99, A damage oriented method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment , 1999 .

[9]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  Life cycle assessment: past, present, and future. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  Badea Nicolae,et al.  Life cycle analysis in refurbishment of the buildings as intervention practices in energy saving , 2015 .

[11]  Maurizio Cellura,et al.  Energy and environmental benefits in public buildings as a result of retrofit actions , 2011 .

[12]  Frank Brown,et al.  A Classification of Built Forms , 2000 .

[13]  Kenneth Ip,et al.  Assessment of double skin façade technologies for office refurbishments in the United Kingdom , 2013 .

[14]  Adolf Acquaye,et al.  Operational vs. embodied emissions in buildings—A review of current trends , 2013 .

[15]  Giovanni Andrea Blengini,et al.  The changing role of life cycle phases, subsystems and materials in the LCA of low energy buildings , 2010 .

[16]  G. L. Baldo,et al.  EcoAudit: a Renewed Simplified Procedure to Facilitate the Environmentally Informed Material Choice Orienting the Further Life Cycle Analysis for Ecodesigners , 2010 .

[17]  Stefan Pauliuk,et al.  Transforming the Norwegian Dwelling Stock to Reach the 2 Degrees Celsius Climate Target , 2013 .

[18]  B. Weidema,et al.  Carbon Footprint , 2008 .

[19]  Bratislav Gakovic,et al.  Areas and Types of Glazing and other Openings in the Nondomestic Building Stock , 2000 .

[20]  Alice Moncaster,et al.  A comparative review of existing data and methodologies for calculating embodied energy and carbon of buildings , 2012 .

[21]  Luis Pérez-Lombard,et al.  A review on buildings energy consumption information , 2008 .

[22]  Gry Alfredsen,et al.  Carbon footprint including effect of carbon storage for selected wooden facade materials , 2014 .

[23]  Roberto Turconi,et al.  Life cycle assessment (LCA) of electricity generation technologies: Overview, comparability and limitations , 2013 .

[24]  Patrick Hofstetter,et al.  Midpoints versus endpoints: The sacrifices and benefits , 2000 .

[25]  Gregory A. Keoleian,et al.  Life cycle energy and environmental performance of a new university building: modeling challenges and design implications , 2003 .

[26]  David Pennington,et al.  Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[27]  Maria Kolokotroni,et al.  Environmental impact analysis for typical office facades , 2004 .

[28]  Hans-Jörg Althaus,et al.  Relevance of simplifications in LCA of building components , 2009 .

[29]  Scott Duncan,et al.  A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment , 2008 .

[30]  Luisa F. Cabeza,et al.  Life cycle assessment of a ventilated facade with PCM in its air chamber , 2014 .

[31]  Sarel Lavy,et al.  Need for an embodied energy measurement protocol for buildings: A review paper , 2012 .

[32]  Jeong Tai Kim,et al.  Development of a Double-Skin Façade for Sustainable Renovation of Old Residential Buildings , 2013 .

[33]  Fatih Karakoyun,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) , 2008 .

[34]  Peter Erskine Wells,et al.  The technology roadmap , 2002 .

[35]  Le Thomas,et al.  Evaluating design strategies, performance and occupant satisfaction: a low carbon office refurbishment , 2010 .

[36]  André De Herde,et al.  Are energy consumptions decreased with the addition of a double-skin? , 2007 .

[37]  G. Psacharopoulos Overview and methodology , 1991 .

[38]  Qian Jin,et al.  A prototype whole-life value optimization tool for façade design , 2014 .

[39]  S. Suh,et al.  On the uncanny capabilities of consequential LCA , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[40]  Giorgio Baldinelli,et al.  Energy and environmental performance optimization of a wooden window: A holistic approach , 2014 .

[41]  Edgar G. Hertwich,et al.  Life cycle assessment of a single-family residence built to either conventional- or passive house standard , 2012 .

[42]  John S. Monahan,et al.  An embodied carbon and energy analysis of modern methods of construction in housing: A case study us , 2011 .

[43]  Geoffrey P. Hammond,et al.  Embodied energy and carbon in construction materials , 2008 .

[44]  Brina Goldfarb,et al.  Double-Skin Façades , 2005 .

[45]  Martin Lutz,et al.  Double-Skin Facades: Integrated Planning , 2001 .

[46]  Harris Poirazis,et al.  ESTABLISHING A SIMPLIFIED CORRELATION BETWEEN A PROPOSED DOUBLE SKIN FAÇADE AND A THERMALLY EQUIVALENT SINGLE SKIN FAÇADE FOR DYNAMIC BUILDING ENERGY MODELLING , 2009 .

[47]  T. Nemecek,et al.  Overview and methodology: Data quality guideline for the ecoinvent database version 3 , 2013 .

[48]  Johan Braet,et al.  Life cycle assessment in the construction sector: A review , 2013 .

[49]  S. Sharples,et al.  Global warming implications of facade parameters: A life cycle assessment of residential buildings in Bahrain , 2013 .

[50]  E. Peereboom,et al.  Influence of Inventory Data Sets on Life‐Cycle Assessment Results: A Case Study on PVC , 1998 .

[51]  K. Shine,et al.  Intergovernmental panel on Climate change (IPCC),in encyclopedia of Enviroment and society,Vol.3 , 2007 .

[52]  Giorgio Baldinelli,et al.  Life cycle assessment of electricity production from renewable energies: Review and results harmonization , 2015 .

[53]  Jessica Johansson,et al.  Weighting in LCA Based on Ecotaxes - Development of a Mid-point Method and Experiences from Case Studies , 2006 .

[54]  Sarel Lavy,et al.  Identification of parameters for embodied energy measurement: A literature review , 2010 .

[55]  Mehdi Shahrestani,et al.  A review of existing building benchmarks and the development of a set of reference office buildings for England and Wales , 2014 .

[56]  Bernan Digest of United Kingdom Energy Statistics: 2008 , 2008 .

[57]  Silvia Brunoro,et al.  An assessment of energetic efficiency improvement of existing building envelopes in Italy , 2008 .

[58]  A. Richards Energy and buildings , 2012 .

[59]  Fionn Stevenson Reducing energy demand through retrofitting buildings , 2013 .

[60]  Alex K. Jones,et al.  Dynamic life cycle assessment: framework and application to an institutional building , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[61]  Mathias Borg,et al.  Generic LCA-methodology applicable for buildings, constructions and operation services: today practice and development needs , 2003 .

[62]  Ikbal Cetiner,et al.  An approach for the evaluation of energy and cost efficiency of glass façades , 2005 .

[63]  Kenneth Ip,et al.  Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of hemp–lime wall constructions in the UK , 2012 .

[64]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  Critical Review of the Current Research Needs and Limitations Related to ISO-LCA Practice , 2008 .

[65]  Jorge de Brito,et al.  Refurbishment decision support tools review—Energy and life cycle as key aspects to sustainable refurbishment projects , 2013 .

[66]  G. Dell'Osso,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of Buildings , 2009 .

[67]  Luisa F. Cabeza,et al.  Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle energy analysis (LCEA) of buildings and the building sector: A review , 2014 .

[68]  Kamaruzzaman Sopian,et al.  Perspectives of double skin façade systems in buildings and energy saving , 2011 .

[69]  L. Gustavsson,et al.  Life cycle primary energy analysis of residential buildings , 2010 .

[70]  C. Thirlwall,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS , 1976 .

[71]  John J. Reap,et al.  A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment , 2008 .