Abstract The objectives of this research were (1) to experimentally quantify the dissolved carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) production within a biofilter (2) to use stoichiometry to estimate the CO 2 production that would be expected across the biofilter due to nitrification and heterotrophic oxygen (O 2 ) demand (3) to compare the relative amounts of CO 2 produced by the biofilter bacteria to the CO 2 produced by the fish that are cultured in the recirculating system, and (4) to discuss implications for recirculating system design that must be considered when it is recognized that a large fraction of the CO 2 produced in a recirculating system is produced by the biofilter. During this study, the fluidized-sand biofilter in the commercial-scale recirculating salmonid culture system at the Conservation Fund Freshwater Institute (Shepherdstown, West Virginia) produced 4.1±0.2 mg/L of CO 2 while removing 0.51±0.02 mg/L total ammonia nitrogen (TAN) and removing 3.8±0.2 mg/L dissolved O 2 . Taking into account the overall stoichiometric relationship between the ammonium, bicarbonate, and oxygen consumed and the cell mass, nitrate, water, and carbonic acid produced during nitrification and nitrifier synthesis, nitrifying bacteria consume 4.6 mg/L of oxygen while producing approximately 5.9 mg/L of CO 2 for every 1 mg/L of TAN consumed. In addition, the estimated respiration of heterotrophic bacteria within the biofilter, as determined by the measured decrease in dissolved oxygen concentration across the biofilter minus the estimated DO consumption due to nitrification, accounts for another 1.38 mg/L of CO 2 production for every 1 mg/L of DO consumed in the biofilter. Accounting for both TAN and DO removal measured across the biofilter, the biofilter’s CO 2 production can be estimated as 5.0±0.3 mg/L, which is reasonably close (approximately 20% greater) to the CO 2 production that was measured experimentally. Because the fish produced 6.9±0.4 mg/L of CO 2 that was measured during the same period, then the biofilter actually accounts for 37% of the total CO 2 produced within this recirculating salmonid system. Therefore, the CO 2 stripping unit should be placed immediately after the biofilter simply as common sense to optimize water quality. If the stripping unit were placed before the biofilter, then the fish would experience a CO 2 concentration that would be at least 20% greater than if the stripping unit were placed immediately after the biofilter.
[1]
Daniel S. Hagopian,et al.
A closer look at the bacteriology of nitrification
,
1998
.
[2]
Ronald D. Mayo,et al.
Salmonid hatchery water reuse systems
,
1972
.
[3]
Wang JawKai.
Techniques for modern aquaculture.
,
1993
.
[4]
Denny S. Parker,et al.
Process Design Manual for Nitrogen Control.
,
1975
.
[5]
M. N. Kutty,et al.
Respiratory Quotients in Goldfish and Rainbow Trout
,
1968
.
[6]
David Roberts,et al.
Developments in recirculating systems for Arctic char culture in North America
,
2004
.
[7]
R. Piedrahita,et al.
Oxygenation and carbon dioxide control in water reuse systems
,
2000
.
[8]
John Davidson,et al.
Evaluation of full-scale carbon dioxide stripping columns in a coldwater recirculating system
,
2003
.
[9]
D. E. Brune,et al.
Aquaculture and water quality
,
1991
.
[10]
B. Watten,et al.
A Semiclosed Recirculating-Water System for High-Density Culture of Rainbow Trout
,
1996
.
[11]
A. E. Greenberg,et al.
Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition
,
1988
.
[12]
C. Boyd,et al.
Modeling the effect of dissolved nitrogen and carbon dioxide on the performance of pure oxygen absorption systems
,
1991
.