Flight Test and Analysis of a Multi-Chamber Aerospike Engine *

Despite the promise of improved performance, aerospike engines have yet to be used on any operational system, owing in large part to the fact that no flight data is available to characterize the interactions between airframe and engine, most notably in transonic, under-expanded flight conditions. The paper discusses the development of a multi-chamber 1,300 lbf thrust LOX/ethanol aerospike engine designed to address this need. The engine is comprised of ten (10) thrusters which incorporate ceramic matrix composite thrust chambers in order to maintain the square 0.6 inch throat and rectangular nozzle constant during the burn. The thrusters are arranged around an annular plug nozzle which is outfitted with a series of pressure sensors in order to obtain flight performance data to be later used for computational fluid dynamics (CFD) tool validation. The engine is integrated into a regulated-helium pressure-fed vehicle which features flight data acquisition and telemetry systems. Sensors include an inertial measurement unit, propulsion system pressure transducers, as well as skin pressure sensors. The vehicle is designed to reach supersonic conditions at approximately 15,000 ft and burnout shortly thereafter, coasting to 25,000 ft before a 2-stage parachute recovery. The flight data will later be analyzed to determine airframe-engine interactions and the associated engine performance, and will be used for comparisons with CFD approaches.

[1]  H Schoyer,et al.  Investigation of advanced rocket propulsion concepts , 1995 .

[2]  Carl A. Aukerman Plug nozzles - The ultimate customer driven propulsion system. [applied to manned lunar and Martian landers] , 1991 .

[3]  James E. Murray,et al.  Flight Research of an Aerospike Nozzle Using High Power Solid Rockets , 2005 .

[4]  Matthew Baker,et al.  CFD Analyses in Support of the Flight Test of a Multi-Chamber LOX/Ethanol Aerospike Engine , 2007 .

[5]  Robert S. Kraemer,et al.  Rocketdyne: Powering Humans into Space , 2005 .

[6]  M. Calabro,et al.  PLUG NOZZLES: SUMMARY OF FLOW FEATURES AND ENGINE PERFORMANCE , 2002 .

[7]  John Garvey,et al.  Aerospike Engines for Nanosat and Small Launch Vehicles (NLV/SLV) , 2004 .

[8]  J. Ruf,et al.  THE PLUME PHYSICS BEHIND AEROSPIKE NOZZLE ALTITUDE COMPENSATION AND SLIPSTREAM EFFECT , 1997 .

[9]  G. Krülle,et al.  Plug Nozzle Flowfield Calculations for SSTO Applications , 1995 .

[10]  Mohan G. Hebsur,et al.  Development and Characterization , 1998 .

[11]  Jie Chen,et al.  A long duration and high reliability liquid apogee engine for satellites , 2004 .

[12]  Stephan Schmidt,et al.  Advanced ceramic matrix composite materials for current and future propulsion technology applications , 2004 .

[13]  John Garvey,et al.  Development and Flight-Testing of Liquid Propellant Aerospike Engines , 2004 .

[14]  G. Hagemann,et al.  Nozzle flowfield analysis with particular regard to 3D-plug cluster configurations , 1996 .

[15]  R. Parsley,et al.  Plug engine systems for future launch vehicle applications , 1992 .

[16]  E. Reske,et al.  Evaluation of altitude compensating nozzle concepts for RLV , 1997 .