The autopod: Its formation during limb development

The autopod, including the mesopodium and the acropodium, is the most distal part of the tetrapod limb, and developmental mechanisms of autopod formation serve as a model system of pattern formation during development. Cartilage rudiments of the autopod develop after proximal elements have differentiated. The autopod region is marked by a change in the expression of two homeobox genes: future autopod cells are first Hoxa11/Hoxa13‐double‐positive and then Hoxa13‐single‐positive. The change in expression of these Hox genes is controlled by upstream mechanisms, including the retinoic acid pathway, and the expression of Hoxa13 is connected to downstream mechanisms, including the autopod‐specific cell surface property mediated by molecules, including cadherins and ephrins/Ephs, for cell‐to‐cell communication and recognition. Comparative analyses of the expression of Hox genes in fish fins and tetrapod limb buds support the notion on the origin of the autopod in vertebrates. This review will focus on the cellular and molecular regulation of the formation of the autopod during development and evolutionary developmental aspects of the origin of the autopod.

[1]  P. B. Gates,et al.  The newt ortholog of CD59 is implicated in proximodistal identity during amphibian limb regeneration. , 2002, Developmental cell.

[2]  Juan Carlos Izpisúa Belmonte,et al.  Patterning mechanisms controlling vertebrate limb development. , 2001, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[3]  N. Shubin,et al.  An autopodial-like pattern of Hox expression in the fins of a basal actinopterygian fish , 2007, Nature.

[4]  Gregor Eichele,et al.  Identification and spatial distribution of retinoids in the developing chick limb bud , 1987, Nature.

[5]  N. Mercader,et al.  Proximodistal identity during vertebrate limb regeneration is regulated by Meis homeodomain proteins , 2005, Development.

[6]  C. Logan,et al.  Abnormal anteroposterior and dorsoventral patterning of the limb bud in the absence of retinoids , 1999, Mechanisms of Development.

[7]  J. W. Saunders.  The proximo-distal sequence of origin of the parts of the chick wing and the role of the ectoderm. , 1948, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[8]  James Sharpe,et al.  Cell tracing reveals a dorsoventral lineage restriction plane in the mouse limb bud mesenchyme , 2007, Development.

[9]  Viktor Hamburger,et al.  A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo , 1992, Journal of morphology.

[10]  D. Summerbell.  A quantitative analysis of the effect of excision of the AER from the chick limb-bud. , 1974, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[11]  U. Dräger,et al.  Restricted expression and retinoic acid-induced downregulation of the retinaldehyde dehydrogenase type 2 (RALDH-2) gene during mouse development , 1997, Mechanisms of Development.

[12]  J. I. Izpisúa Belmonte,et al.  Control of vertebrate limb outgrowth by the proximal factor Meis2 and distal antagonism of BMPs by Gremlin. , 1999, Molecular cell.

[13]  A. Kuroiwa,et al.  Involvement of the Chox-4 chicken homeobox genes in determination of anteroposterior axial polarity during limb development , 1991, Cell.

[14]  Characterisation of Hoxa gene expression in the chick limb bud in response to FGF , 2001, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[15]  V. Hamburger,et al.  A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. 1951. , 2012, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[16]  Zerina Johanson,et al.  Fish fingers: digit homologues in sarcopterygian fish fins. , 2007, Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution.

[17]  B. Draper,et al.  dackel acts in the ectoderm of the zebrafish pectoral fin bud to maintain AER signaling. , 2000, Development.

[18]  H. Ide,et al.  Sorting out of limb bud cells in monolayer culture. , 1994, The International journal of developmental biology.

[19]  P Chambon,et al.  Hoxa-13 and Hoxd-13 play a crucial role in the patterning of the limb autopod. , 1996, Development.

[20]  S. Noji,et al.  Retinoic acid induces polarizing activity but is unlikely to be a morphogen in the chick limb bud , 1991, Nature.

[21]  Valentina Salsi,et al.  Hoxd13 and Hoxa13 Directly Control the Expression of the EphA7 Ephrin Tyrosine Kinase Receptor in Developing Limbs* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[22]  Farish A. Jenkins,et al.  The pectoral fin of Tiktaalik roseae and the origin of the tetrapod limb , 2006, Nature.

[23]  M. Capecchi,et al.  Absence of radius and ulna in mice lacking hoxa-11 andhoxd-11 , 1995, Nature.

[24]  G. Eichele,et al.  Complementary domains of retinoic acid production and degradation in the early chick embryo. , 1999, Developmental biology.

[25]  M. Maden,et al.  Retinoic acid gradients during limb regeneration. , 1994, Developmental biology.

[26]  C. Tickle,et al.  The effects of local application of retinoids to different positions along the proximo-distal axis of embryonic chick wings , 2004, Roux's archives of developmental biology.

[27]  D. SUMMERBELL,et al.  Positional Information in Chick Limb Morphogenesis , 1973, Nature.

[28]  M. S. Steinberg,et al.  Does differential adhesion govern self-assembly processes in histogenesis? Equilibrium configurations and the emergence of a hierarchy among populations of embryonic cells. , 1970, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[29]  A. Kuroiwa,et al.  Homeobox gene expression correlated with the bifurcation process of limb cartilage development , 1991, Nature.

[30]  D. Stocum,et al.  Retinoic-acid-induced pattern completion in regenerating double anterior limbs of urodeles. , 1984, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[31]  P. Chambon,et al.  Embryonic retinoic acid synthesis is required for forelimb growth and anteroposterior patterning in the mouse. , 2002, Development.

[32]  C. Martínez-A,et al.  Opposing RA and FGF signals control proximodistal vertebrate limb development through regulation of Meis genes. , 2000, Development.

[33]  K. Hara,et al.  Cell adhesiveness and affinity for limb pattern formation. , 2002, The International journal of developmental biology.

[34]  H. Ide,et al.  Cell Sorting and Chondrogenic Aggregate Formation in Limb Bud Recombinants and in Culture , 1993 .

[35]  G. Martin,et al.  The roles of FGFs in the early development of vertebrate limbs. , 1998, Genes & development.

[36]  T. Nohno,et al.  Glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored cell surface proteins regulate position-specific cell affinity in the limb bud. , 1998, Developmental biology.

[37]  L. Wolpert.  Positional information and the spatial pattern of cellular differentiation. , 1969, Journal of theoretical biology.

[38]  K. Tamura,et al.  Induction of polarizing activity by retinoic acid occurs independently of duplicate formation in developing chick limb buds. , 1993, Developmental biology.

[39]  G. Duester,et al.  Retinoic Acid Synthesis Controlled by Raldh2 Is Required Early for Limb Bud Initiation and Then Later as a Proximodistal Signal during Apical Ectodermal Ridge Formation* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[40]  S. Bryant,et al.  Conversion by retinoic acid of anterior cells into ZPA cells in the chick wing bud , 1991, Nature.

[41]  I. A. Niazi,et al.  Abnormal hind limb regeneration in tadpoles of the toad, Bufo andersoni, exposed to excess vitamin A. , 1978, Folia biologica.

[42]  C. Simons,et al.  Prospective teratology of retinoic acid metabolic blocking agents (RAMBAs) and loss of CYP26 activity. , 2007, Current pharmaceutical design.

[43]  D. Duboule,et al.  Zebrafish Hoxa and Evx-2 genes: cloning, developmental expression and implications for the functional evolution of posterior Hox genes , 1996, Mechanisms of Development.

[44]  C. Tickle,et al.  A quantitative analysis of the effect of all-trans-retinoic acid on the pattern of chick wing development. , 1985, Developmental biology.

[45]  D. Stocum,et al.  Retinoic acid coordinately proximalizes regenerate pattern and blastema differential affinity in axolotl limbs. , 1988, Development.

[46]  Denis Duboule,et al.  Hox gene expression in teleost fins and the origin of vertebrate digits , 1995, Nature.

[47]  K M Higgins,et al.  Loss of Eph-receptor expression correlates with loss of cell adhesion and chondrogenic capacity in Hoxa13 mutant limbs. , 2001, Development.

[48]  Takayoshi Inoue,et al.  Cadherin-11 expressed in association with mesenchymal morphogenesis in the head, somite, and limb bud of early mouse embryos. , 1995, Developmental biology.

[49]  D. Stocum,et al.  Retinoic acid-induced pattern duplication in regenerating urodele limbs. , 1984, Developmental biology.

[50]  G. Wagner,et al.  The tetrapod limb: a hypothesis on its origin. , 2001, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[51]  K. Tamura,et al.  Role of N‐cadherin in the sorting‐out of mesenchymal cells and in the positional identity along the proximodistal axis of the chick limb bud , 1999, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[52]  C. Tabin,et al.  A cellular lineage analysis of the chick limb bud. , 2007, Developmental biology.

[53]  H. Ide,et al.  Sorting out of cells from different parts and stages of the chick limb bud. , 1994, Developmental biology.

[54]  H. Iba,et al.  Misexpression of Hoxa-13 induces cartilage homeotic transformation and changes cell adhesiveness in chick limb buds. , 1995, Genes & development.

[55]  Ginés Morata,et al.  Conserved regulation of proximodistal limb axis development by Meis1/Hth , 1999, Nature.

[56]  Koji Tamura,et al.  Specification of cell fate along the proximal-distal axis in the developing chick limb bud , 2007, Development.

[57]  G. Wagner,et al.  Expression of Hoxa‐11 and Hoxa‐13 in the pectoral fin of a basal ray‐finned fish, Polyodon spathula: implications for the origin of tetrapod limbs , 2005, Evolution & development.

[58]  Nobutaka Koibuchi,et al.  Existence of gradient in cell adhesiveness along the developing Xenopus hind limb bud, shown by a cellular sorting‐out experiment in vitro , 1998, Development, Growth and Differentiation.

[59]  D. Heinegård,et al.  Identification of Tyrosine Sulfation in Extracellular Leucine-rich Repeat Proteins Using Mass Spectrometry* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[60]  M. Maden,et al.  Vitamin A and pattern formation in the regenerating limb , 1982, Nature.

[61]  L. Wolpert,et al.  The progress zone — alive or dead? , 2002, Nature Cell Biology.

[62]  M. Capecchi,et al.  A mutational analysis of the 5' HoxD genes: dissection of genetic interactions during limb development in the mouse. , 1996, Development.

[63]  K. Tamura,et al.  Pattern formation in dissociated limb bud mesenchyme in vitro and in vivo , 1998, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[64]  M. Cohn,et al.  Biphasic Hoxd Gene Expression in Shark Paired Fins Reveals an Ancient Origin of the Distal Limb Domain , 2007, PloS one.

[65]  A. Kuroiwa,et al.  Retinoic acid changes the proximodistal developmental competence and affinity of distal cells in the developing chick limb bud. , 1997, Developmental biology.

[66]  J. Fallon,et al.  Birds have dinosaur wings: The molecular evidence. , 2005, Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution.

[67]  J. Brockes.  Introduction of a retinoid reporter gene into the urodele limb blastema. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[68]  J. Lewis,et al.  Time, place and positional value in the chick limb-bud. , 1975, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[69]  Y. Saijoh,et al.  Regulation of retinoic acid distribution is required for proximodistal patterning and outgrowth of the developing mouse limb. , 2004, Developmental cell.

[70]  Isabel Palmeirim,et al.  A molecular clock operates during chick autopod proximal-distal outgrowth. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[71]  L. Wolpert,et al.  Morphogenesis of the vertebrate limb. , 1975, Ciba Foundation symposium.

[72]  Jesús C. Casanova,et al.  Digit morphogenesis: Is the tip different? , 2007, Development, growth & differentiation.

[73]  K. Tamura,et al.  Distribution of retinoids in the chick limb bud: analysis with monoclonal antibody. , 1990, Developmental biology.

[74]  L. Wolpert,et al.  Local application of retinoic acid to the limb bond mimics the action of the polarizing region , 1982, Nature.

[75]  J. Nardi,et al.  Surface properties of regenerating limb cells: Evidence for gradation along the proximodistal axis , 1984 .

[76]  C. Tabin,et al.  Analysis of Hox gene expression in the chick limb bud. , 1996, Development.

[77]  Lewis Wolpert,et al.  Rethinking the proximodistal axis of the vertebrate limb in the molecular era. , 2007, Genes & development.

[78]  C. Nüsslein-Volhard,et al.  Transient establishment of anteroposterior polarity in the zebrafish pectoral fin bud in the absence of sonic hedgehog activity. , 1999, Development.

[79]  T. Nohno,et al.  Ephrin-A2 regulates position-specific cell affinity and is involved in cartilage morphogenesis in the chick limb bud. , 2003, Developmental biology.